Suspected choledocholithiasis: Endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography? A systematic review

European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Volumn 19, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 1007-1011

  Ledro Cano, Diego ^a  

^a Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy ^*  (Spain)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Choledocholithiasis; Endoscopic ultrasound; Magnetic resonance cholangio pancreatography; Meta analysis; Sensitivity; Specificity

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL; COCHRANE LIBRARY; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS; ENDOSONOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 37349106330     PISSN: 0954691X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328133f30b     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Hermann RE. The spectrum of biliary stone disease. Am J Surg 1989; 158:171-173.
2. Das A, Isenberg G, Wong RC, Sivak MV Jr, Chak A. Wire-Guided intraductal US: an adjunct to ERCP in the management of bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54:31-36.
3. Kawabe T, Komatsu Y, Tada M, Toda N, Ohashi M, Shiratori Y, Omata M. Endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation in cirrhotic patients: removal of common bile duct stones without sphincterotomy. Endoscopy 1996; 28:694-698.
4. Laing FC. Ultrasound diagnosis of CBD stone. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1987; 8:103-113.
5. Laing FC, Jeffrey RB, Wing VW, et al. Biliary dilatation: defining level and cause by realtime US. Radiology 1986; 160:39-42.
6. Jeffrey RB Jr, Federele MP, Laing FC, Wall S, Rego J, Moss AA. Computed tomography of CBD stone. Am J Roentgenol 1983; 140:1179-1183.
7. Baron RL. Common bile duct stones. Radiology 1987; 162:419-424.
8. Palazzo L, Girollet PP, Salmeron M, Silvain C, Roseau G, Canard JM, et al. Value of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones: comparison with surgical exploration and ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 42:225-231.
9. Chan AC, Chung SC, Wyman A, Kwong KH, Ng EK, Lau JY, et al. Selective use of preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 43:212-215.
10. Prat F, Amouyal G, Amouyal P, Pelletier G, Fritsch J, Choury AD, et al. Prospective controlled study of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspected common bile duct lithiasis. Lancet 1996; 347:75-79.
11. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK, Siegenberg D, Ferrucci T, Chuttani R. Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology 1996; 110: 589-597.
12. Zidi SH, Prat F, Guen OL, Rondeau Y, Rocher L, Fritsch J, et al. Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with a reference imaging method. Gut 1999; 44:118-122.
13. Verma D, Kapadia A, Eisen GM, Adler DG. EUS versus MRCP for detection of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64:248-254.
14. de Ledinghen V, Lecesne R, Raymond JM, Gense V, Amouretti M, Drouillard J, et al. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: EUS or magnetic resonance cholangiography? A prospective controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49:26-31.
15. Materne R, Van Beers BE, Gigot JF, Jamart J, Geubel A, Pringot J, Deprez P. Extrahepatic biliary obstruction: magnetic resonance imaging compared with endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopy 2000; 32:3-9.
16. Scheiman JM, Carlos RC, Barnett JL, Elta GH, Nostrant TT, Chey WD, et al. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A cost trial and cost analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96:2900-2903.
17. Ainsworth AP, Rafaelsen SR, Wamberg PA, Durup J, Pless TK, Mortersen MB. Is there a difference in diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact between endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography? Endoscopy 2003; 35:1029-1032.
18. Kondo S, Isayama H, Akahane M. Detection of common bile duct stones: comparison between endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiography and helical-computed-tomographic cholangiography. Eur J Radiol 2005; 54:271-275.
19. Aube C, Delorme B, Yzet T, Burtin P, Lebigot J, Pessaux P, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic sonography in suspected common bile duct lithiasis: a prospective comparative study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184:55-62.
20. Schmidt S, Chevallier P, Novellas S, Gelsi E, Vanbiervliet G, Tran G, et al. Choledocholithiasis: repetitive thick-lab single-shot projection magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic ultrasonography. Eur Radiol 2006; 29:Epub ahead of print.
21. Bret PM, Reinhold C. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopy 1997; 29:472-486.