An NMA-guided path planning approach for computing large-amplitude conformational changes in proteins

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 131-143

  Kirillova, Svetlana ^a   Cortés, Juan ^a   Stefaniu, Alin ^a   Siméon, Thierry ^a  

^a LAAS CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Adenylate kinase open closed transition pathway; Elastic network normal mode analysis; Large amplitude conformational transitions; Path planning algorithms; Protein flexibility

Indexed keywords

ADENYLATE KINASE; BINDING PROTEIN; CAPSID PROTEIN; OXIDOREDUCTASE; PROTEIN; SULFATE ADENYLYLTRANSFERASE;

ALGORITHM; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; ELASTIC NETWORK NORMAL MODE ANALYSIS; ENERGY; GEOMETRY; MACROMOLECULE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MOTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; RELIABILITY; ROBOTICS;

ALGORITHMS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 37349101940     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21570     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Carlson HA. Protein flexibility is an important component of structure-based drug discovery. Curr Pharm Des 2002;8:1571-1578.
2. Cavasotto CN, Orry AJW, Abagyan RA. The challenge of considering receptor flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening. Curr Comput Aided Drug Des 2005;1:423-440.
3. Janin J. Assessing predictions of protein-protein interaction: the CAPRI experiment. Protein Sci 2005;14:278-283.
4. Ehrlich LP, Nilges M, Wade RC. The impact of protein flexibility on protein-protein docking. Proteins 2005;58:126-133.
5. Floquet N, Marechal J-D, Badet-Denisot M-A, Robert CH, Dauchez M, Perahia D. Normal mode analysis as a prerequisite for drug design: application to matrix metalloproteinases inhibitors. FEBS Lett 2006;580:5130-5136.
6. Leach AR. Molecular modeling: principles and applications. Essex: Longman; 1996.
7. Schlick T. Molecular modeling and simulation - an interdisciplinary guide. New York: Springer; 2002.
8. Apaydin MS, Brutlag DL, Guestrin C, Hsu D, Latombe J-C, Varma C. Stochastic roadmap simulation: an efficient representation and algorithm for analyzing molecular motion. J Comput Biol 2003;10:257-281.
9. Cortés J, Siméon T, Ruiz-deAngulo V, Guieysse D, Remaud-Siméon M, Tran V. A path planning approach for computing large-amplitude motions of flexible molecules. Bioinformatics 2005;21:i116-i125.
10. Cortés J, Siméon T, Remaud-Siméon M, Tran V. Geometric algorithms for the conformational analysis of long protein loops. J Comput Chem 2004;25:956-967.
11. Enosh A, Fleishman SJ, Ben-Tal N, Halperin D. Prediction and simulation of motion in pairs of transmembrane α-helices. Bioinformatics 2007;23;e212-e218.
12. Cui Q, Bahar I. Normal mode analysis: theory and applications to biological and chemical systems. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2006.
13. Brooks BR, Karplus M. Normal modes for specific motions of macromolecules: application to the hinge-bending mode of lysozyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1985;82:4995-4999.
14. Hinsen K. Analysis of domain motions by approximate normal mode calculations. Proteins 1998;33:417-429.
15. Tama F, Sanejouand YH. Conformational change of proteins arising from normal mode analysis. Protein Eng 2001;14:1-6.
16. Alexandrov V, Lehnert U, Echols N, Milburn D, Engelman D, Gerstein M. Normal modes for predicting protein motions: a comprehensive database assessment and associated Web tool. Protein Sci 2005;14:633-643.
17. Mouawad L, Perahia D. Motions in hemoglobin studied by normal mode analysis and energy minimization: evidence for the existence of tertiary T-like, quaternary R-like intermediate structures. J Mol Biol 1996;258:393-410.
18. Miyashita O, Onuchic JN, Wolynes PG. Nonlinear elasticity, proteinquakes, and the energy landscapes of functional transitions in proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:12570-12575.
19. Tama F, Miyashita O, Brooks IIICL. Normal mode based flexible fitting of high-resolution structure into low-resolution experimental data from cryo-EM. J Struct Biol 2004;147:315-326.
20. Jeong JI, Lattman EE, Chirikjian GS. A method for finding candidate conformations for molecular replacement using relative rotation between domains of a known structure. Acta Cryst 2006;D62;398-409.
21. Tirion MM. Large amplitude elastic motions in proteins from a single-parameter, atomic analysis. Phys Rev Lett 1996;77:1905-1908.
22. Tama F, Brooks IIICL. The mechanism and pathway of pH induced swelling in cowpea chlorotic mottle virus. J Mol Biol 2002;318:733-747.
23. Bahar I, Atilgan AR, Erman B. Direct evaluation of thermal fluctuations in proteins using a single-parameter harmonic potential. Fold Des 1997;2:173-181.
24. Cavasotto CN, Kovacs JA, Abagyan RA. Representing receptor flexibility in ligand docking through relevant normal modes. J Am Chem Soc 2005;127:9632-9640.
25. Kim MK, Jernigan RL, Chirikjian GS. Efficient generation of feasible pathways for protein conformational transitions. Biophys J 2002;83:1620-1630.
26. Maragakis P, Karplus M. Large amplitude conformational change in proteins explored with a plastic network model: adenylate kinase. J Mol Biol 2005;352:807-822.
27. Suhre K, Sanejouand YH. ElNémo: a normal mode web-server for protein movement analysis and the generation of templates for molecular replacement. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32:W610-W614.
28. Tama F, Gadea FX, Marques O, Sanejouand YH. Building-block approach for determining low-frequency normal modes of macromolecules. Proteins 2000;41:1-7.
29. Schuyler AD, Chirikjian GS. Efficient determination of low-frequency normal modes of large protein structures by cluster-NMA. J Mol Graph Model 2005;24:46-58.
30. Latombe J-C. Robot motion planning. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1991.
31. LaValle SM. Planning algorithms. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
32. Amato NM, Dill KA, Song G. Using motion planning to map protein folding landscapes and analyze folding kinetics of known native structures. J Comput Biol 2003;10:239-255.
33. Ruiz de Angulo V, Cortés J, Siméon T. BioCD: an efficient algorithm for self-collision and distance computation between highly articulated molecular models. In: Thrun S, Sukhatme G, Schaal S, Brock O, editors. Robotics: science and systems I. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2005. p 6-11.
34. LaValle SM, Kuffner JJ. Rapidly-exploring random trees: progress and prospects. In: Donald BR, Lynch KM, Rus D, editors. Algorithmic and computational robotics: new directions (WAFR2000). Boston: AK Peters; 2001. p 293-308.
35. Lindorff-Larsen K, Best RB, DePristo MA, Dobson CM, Vendruscolo M. Simultaneous determination of protein structure and dynamics. Nature 2005;433:128-132.
36. Müller CW, Schulz GE. Structure of the complex between adenylate kinase from Escherichia coli and the inhibitor Ap5A refined at 1.9 Å resolution. A model for a catalytic transition state. J Mol Biol 1992;224:159-177.
37. Müller CW, Schlauderer GJ, Reinstein J, Schulz GE. Adenylate kinase motions during catalysis: an energetic counterweight balancing substrate binding. Structure 1996;4:147-156.
38. Dror O, Benyamini H, Nussinov R, Wolfson H. MASS: multiple structural alignment by secondary structures. Bioinformatics 2003;19:i95-i104.
39. DePristo MA, de Bakker PIW, Lovell SC, Blundell TL. Ab initio construction of polypeptide fragments: efficient generation of accurate, representative ensembles. Proteins 2003;51:41-55.
40. Flores S, Echols N, Milburn D, Hespenheide B, Keating K, Lu J, Wells S, Yu EZ, Thorpe M, Gerstein M. The database of macromolecular motions: new features added at the decade mark. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34:D296-301.
41. Mouawad L, Perahia D. Diagonalization in a mixed basis: a method to compute low-frequency normal modes for large macromolecules. Biopolymers 1993;33:599-611.