Implementing software development guidelines in a medical informatics research project

Methods of Information in Medicine

Volumn 46, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 641-645

  Ißler, Lutz ^a   Spreckelsen, C ^b   Wessel C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Guidelines; Medical informatics; Software engineering

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONSENSUS; ENGINEERING; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GERMANY; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; SOFTWARE;

EID: 37349090690     PISSN: 00261270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3414/ME0428     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Weßel C, Spreckelsen C, Ißler L, Karakas G, Möller W, Palm S, et al. Die Qualitätsberichte der deutschen Krankenhäuser im Internet ab 2005: Erstellung mit Hilfe des objektorientierten Meta-modells für Krankenhäuser MINERVA. In: Ammenwerth E, Gaus W, Haux R, Lovis C, Pfeiffer KP, Tilg B, et al., editors. Abstracts der 49. Jahrestagung der GMDS, 26.-30. September 2004, Innsbruck. Niebüll: videel; 2004. pp 144-146. (InGerman.)
2. Pape B, Bleek WG, Jackewitz I, Janneck M. Requirements for Project-Based Learning - CommSy as an Exemplary Approach. In: Sprague RH, editor. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos; 2002.
3. Kuhn KA, Lenz R, Elstner T, Siegele H, Moll R. Experiences with a generator tool for building clinical application modules. Methods Inf Med 2003; 42 (1): 37-44.
4. Nykänen P, Karimaa E. Success and Failure Factors in the Regional Health Information System Design Process - Results from a Constructive Evaluation Study. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45: 85-89.
5. Jacobson I, Booch G, Rumbaugh J. The Unified Software Development Process. Addison-Wesley; 1999.
6. Ammenwerth E, Shaw NT. Bad Health Informatics Can Kill - Is Evaluation the Answer? Methods Inf Med 2005; 44: 1-3.
7. International Organization for Standardization. ISO/IEC 9126 Software engineering - Product quality - Part 1 : Quality model; 2001.
8. Field MJ, Lohr KN, editors. Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program. Washington: National Academy Press; 1990.
9. Shekelle PG, Woolf SH, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Clinical guidelines: Developing guidelines. British Medical Journal. 1999;318:593-6.
10. Feder G, Eccles M, Grol R, Griffiths C, Grimshaw J. Clinical guidelines: Using clinical guidelines. British Medical Journal 1999; 318: 728-730.
11. Michie S, Johnston M. Changing clinical behaviour by making guidelines specific. British Medical Journal 2004; 328: 343-345.
12. Council of Europe. Developing a methodology for drawing up guidelines on best medical practices (Recommendation (2001) and explanatory memorandum). Council of Europe; 2002.
13. Greif N, Schrepf H. Information Technology Guidelines for Software Development : Guideline for Programming in C. Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt. Bonn; 2002.
14. Sun Microsystems. Code Conventions for the Java Programming Language : Revised April 20, 1999. Sun Microsystems; 1999.
15. Chisholm W, Vanderheiden G, Jacobs I, editors. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. World Wide Web Consortium; 1999.
16. Federal Republic of Germany. V-Model 97, Life-cycle Process Model - Developing Standard for IT Systems of the Federal Republic of Germany: General Directive No. 250. Federal Republic of Germany; 1997.
17. Averill E. Reference models and standards. StandardView 1994; 2 (2): 96-109.
18. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology. ANSI/IEEE Standard 610.12-1990; 1990.
19. McAlearney AS, Schweikhart SB, Medow MA. Doctors' experience with handheld computers in clinical practice: qualitative study. British Medical Journal 2004; 328 (7449): 1162.
20. Smith AC. Design and Conduct of Subjectivist Studies. In: Friedman C, Wyatt J, editors. Evaluation Methods in Medical Informatics. Springer; 1997. pp 223-253.
21. Coreil J. Group interview methods in community health research. Med Anthropol 1995; 16: 193-210.
22. Bradner S. Request for Comments: 2119. Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels. Network Working Group; 1997.
23. Reddy M, Pratt W, Dourish P, Shabot MM. Sociotechnical Requirements Analysis for Clinical Systems. Methods Inf Med 2003; 42: 437-444.
24. Hartswood MJ, Procter RN, Rouchy P, Rouncefield M, Slack R, Voss A. Working IT Out in Medical Practice: IT Systems Design and Development as Co-Realisation. Methods Inf Med 2003; 42: 392-397.
25. Kaplan B, Shaw NT. Future Directions in Evaluation Research: People, Organizational, and Social Issues. Methods Inf Med 2004; 43: 215-231.
26. Ißler L, Becker N. Spreckelsen C, Weßel C. The CERES Project - CERES Software Development Guidelines. Aachener Schriften zur Medizinischen Informatik 2007; 1. Obtainable via http://publikationen.med-informatik.ukaachen. de/.