A site-specific land and water management model in MIKE SHE

Nordic Hydrology

Volumn 38, Issue 4-5, 2007, Pages 333-350

  Rubarenzya, Mark Henry ^a   Graham, D ^b   Feyen, J ^a   Willems, P ^a   Berlamont, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b DHI   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Distributed modelling; Grote Nete; MIKE SHE; Site specific model

Indexed keywords

CHANNEL FLOW; GRAPHIC METHODS; LAND USE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RUNOFF; STATISTICAL METHODS; WATER MANAGEMENT; WAVE EQUATIONS;

DIFFUSION WAVE EQUATION; DISTRIBUTED MODELLING; OVERLAND FLOW; RICHARD EQUATION; SAINT VENANT EQUATION; SITE-SPECIFIC MODEL; THREE-DIMENSIONAL DARCY EQUATION;

HYDROLOGY;

CATCHMENT; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; HYDROLOGICAL CYCLE; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; LAND MANAGEMENT; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; WATER MANAGEMENT;

EID: 37349085310     PISSN: 00291277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2166/nh.2007.016     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Allen, G.R., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D. and Martin, S. (1998). Crop Evapotranspiration - Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. Rep. No. Paper 56. Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome, Italy.
2. Bandy, J. and Willems, P. (2000). Towards a more physically-based calibration of lumped conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Hydroinformatics 2000, CD-ROM proceedings, Iowa, 12.
3. Batelaan, O. (2006). Phreatology. Characterising Groundwater Recharge and Discharge Using Remote Sensing, GIS, Ecology, Hydrochemistry, and Groundwater Modelling. PhD thesis. Vrije Universiteit Brussel.
4. Beven, K.J. (1985). Distributed modelling. In M.G. Anderson and T.P. Burt (Eds.), Hydrological Forecasting, Wiley, Chichester, pp. 405-435.
5. Beven, K.J. (1993). Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling. Adv. War. Res., 16, 41-51.
6. Beven, K.J. (1996). A discussion of distributed modelling. In J.C. Refsgaard and M.B. Abbott (Eds.), Distributed Hydrological Modelling, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 255-278.
7. Beven, K.J. (2000). Uniqueness of place and process representations in hydrological modelling. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 4 (2), 203-213.
8. Beven, K.J. (2001). How far can we go in distributed hydrological modelling? Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 5(1), 1-12.
9. Blöschl, G. (2001). Scaling in hydrology. Hydrol. Process (HP Today), 15, 709-711.
10. Boyle, D.P., Gupta, H.V. and Sorooshian, S. (2000). Towards improved calibration of hydrological models: combining the strength of manual and automatic methods. War. Res. Res., 36(12), 3663-3674.
11. Carpenter, T.M. and Georgakakos, K.P. (2004). Impacts of parametric and radar rainfall uncertainty on the ensemble streamflow, simulations of a distributed hydrological model. J. Hydrol., 298(1-4), 202-221.
12. Chapman, T. (1991). Comment on "Evaluation of automated techniques for base flow and recession analysis" by Nathan, R.J. and McMahon, T.A. Wat. Res. Res., 27(7), 1783-1784.
13. Graham, D.N. and Butts, M.B. (2006). Flexible integrated watershed modeling with MIKE SHE. In V.P. Singh and D.K. Frevert (Eds.), Watershed Models, Taylor and Francis/CRC Press, Bocan Raton, FL, pp. 245-272.
14. Havno, K., Madsen, M.N. and Dorge, J. (1995). MIKE 11 - A generalised river modelling package. In V.P. Singh (Ed.), Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, Water Resources Publications, CO, pp. 809-846.
15. Jungwirth, M., Muhar, S. and Schmutz, S. (2002). Re-establishing and assessing ecological integrity in riverine landscapes. Freshwater Biol., 47, 867-887.
16. Kelly, K.S. and Krzysztofowicz, R. (1997). A bivariate meta-Gaussian density for use in hydrology. Stochast. Hydrol. Hydraul., 11, 17-31.
17. Kokkonen, T.S. and Jakeman, A.J. (2001). A comparison of metric and conceptual approaches in rainfall-runoff modeling and its implications. Wat. Res. Res., 37(9), 2345-2352.
18. Kristensen, K.J. and Jensen, S.E. (1975). A model for estimating actual evapotranspiration from potential transpiration. Nordic Hydrol., 6, 70-88.
19. Kusler, J.A. and Kentula, M.E. (1990). Wetland Creation and Restoration: The Status of The Science, Island Press, Washington, DC.
20. Legates, D.R. and McCabe, G.J. (1999). Evaluating the use of "goodness-of-fit" measures in hydrologic and hydroclimate model validation. War. Res. Res., 35(1), 233-241.
21. Madsen, H. (2000). Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model using multiple objectives. J. Hydrol., 235, 276-288.
22. Madsen, H. (2003). Parameter estimation in distributed hydrological catchment modeling using automatic calibration with multiple objectives. Adv. War. Res., 26(2), 205-216.
23. Michaud, J. and Sorooshian, S. (1994). Comparison of simple versus complex distributed runoff models on a midsized semiarid watershed. Wat. Res. Res., 30(3), 593-605.
24. Mitsch, W.J. (1993). Ecological engineering - a cooperative role with the planetary life-support systems. Environ. Sci. Tech., 27, 438-445.
25. Mitsch, W.J. (1998). Ecological engineering - the seven year itch. Ecol. Engng., 10, 119-138.
26. Mitsch, W.J., Lefeuvre, J.C. and Bouchard, V. (2002). Ecological engineering applied to river and wetland restoration. Ecol. Engng., 18(5), 529-541.
27. Mitsch, W.J. and Wilson, R.F. (1996). Improving the success of wetland creation and restoration with know-how, time and self-design. J. Appl. Ecol., 6, 77-83.
28. Moran, P.A.P. (1970). Simulation and evaluation of complex water system operations. Wat. Res. Res., 6, 1737-1742.
29. Nash, J.E. and Sutcliffe, I.V. (1970). River flow forecasting through conceptual models. J. Hydrol., 273, 282-290.
30. Niehoff, D., Fritsch, U. and Bronstert, A. (2002). Land-use impacts on storm-runoff generation: scenarios of land-use change and simulation of hydrological response in a meso-scale catchment in SW Germany. J. Hydrol., 267(1-2), 80-93.
31. Palmer, M.A., Bernhardt, E.S., Allan, J.D., Lake, P.S., Alexander, G., Brooks, S., Carr, J., Clayton, S., Dahm, C.N., Shah, J.F., Galat, D.L., Loss, S.G., Goodwin, P., Hart, D.D., Hassett, B., Jenkinson, R., Kondolf, G.M., Lave, R., Meyer, J.L., O'Donnell, T.K., Pagano, L. and Sudduth, E. (2005). Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. J. Appl. Ecol., 42, 208-217.
32. Pedroli, B., De Blust, G., Van Looy, K. and Van Rooij, S. (2002). Setting targets in strategies for river restoration. Landscape Ecol., 17(Suppl. 1), 5-18.
33. Raes, D., Van Aelst, P. and Wyseure, G. (1986). ETREF, ETCROP, ETSPLIT and DEFICIT. A Computer Package for Calculating Crop Water Requirements, Leuven, Laboratory of Soil and Water Engineering, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.
34. Reed, S., Koren, V., Smith, M., Zhang, Z., Moreda, F., Seo, D.J., Arnold, J.G., Bandaragoda, C., Bingeman, A., Bras, R., Butts, M.B., Carpenter, T.M., Cui, Z., Diluzio, M., Georgakakos, K.P., Gaur, A., Guo, J., Gupta, H.V., Hogue, T., Ivanov, V., Khodatalab, N., Lan, L., Liang, X.L.D., Mitchell, K., Peters-Lidard, C., Rodriguez, E., Seglenieks, F., Shamir, E., Tarboton, D., Vieux, B., Vivoni, E. and Woods, R. (2004). Overall distributed model intercomparison project results. J. Hydrol., 298, 27-60.
35. Refsgaard, J.C. and Knudsen, J. (1996). Operational validation and intercomparison of different types of hydrological models. Wat. Res. Res., 32(7), 2189-2202.
36. Refsgaard, J.C. and Storm, B. (1995). MIKE SEE. In V.P. Singh (Ed.), Computer Models for Watershed Hydrology, Water Resources Publications, Highland Ranch, CO, pp. 809-846.
37. Reggiani, P., Hassanizadeh, S.M., Sivapalan, M. and Gray, W.G. (1999). A unifying framework for watershed thermodynamics: constitutive relationships. Adv. Wat. Res., 23, 15-39.
38. Reggiani, P., Sivapalan, M. and Hassanizadeh, S.M. (1998). A unifying framework for watershed thermodynamics: balance equations for mass, momentum, energy and entropy and the second law of thermodynamics. Adv. Wat. Res., 23, 15-40.
39. Reggiani, P., Sivapalan, M. and Hassanizadeh, S.M. (2000). Conservation equations governing hillslope response: exploring the physical basis of water balance. Wat. Res. Res., 16, 1845-1863.
40. Richardson, C.J. (1994). Ecological functions and human values in wetlands: a framework for assessing forestry impacts. Wetlands, 14, 1-9.
41. Ripl, W., Hildmann, C., Janssen, T., Gerlach, I., Heller, S. and Ridgill, S. (1995). Sustainable Redevelopment of a River and its Catchment - The Stör River Project, IWRB Publication, Slimbridge, UK.
42. Roubani, H. (2004). Report of Rainfall Input Data: Grote Nete and Grote Laak Catchments, Laboratory of Hydraulics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.
43. Rubarenzya, M.H., Willems, P., Berlamont, J. and Feyen, J. (2005a). Applying MIKE SHE to define the influence of rewetting on floods in Flanders. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Inter-Celtic Colloquium on Hydrology and Management of Water Resources, Guimaraes, Portugal. Available on CD-ROM.
44. Rubarenzya, M.H., Willems, P., Berlamont, J. and Feyen, J. (2005b). Modelling of River Valley Rewetting and Extreme Events in the Nete Catchment (Belgium), Taylor & Francis/A.A. Balkema Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands.
45. Rubarenzya, M.H., Willems, P., Feyen, J. and Berlamont, J. (2006). Modeling of soil hydraulic properties and base flow in Flanders. In: Proceedings of the EWRI World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, Omaha, NB. The American Society of Civil Engineers.
46. Smith, R.E., Goodrich, D.R., Woolhiser, D.A. and Simanton, J.R. (1994). Comments on "Physically-based hydrological modelling Is the concept realistic?" by R.B. Grayson, I.D. Moore and T.A. McMahon. Wat. Res. Res., 30, 851-854.
47. Sorooshian, S. and Dracup, J.A. (1990). Stochastic parameter estimation procedures for hydrologic rainfall-runoff models: correlated and heteroscedastic error cases. Wat. Res. Res., 16(2), 430-442.
48. Staes, J. and Meire, P. (2006). A Tool for Participatory Land-use Planning and River Basin Management, International Seminar on Collaborative Planning of Natural Resources Management, Helsinki, Finnish Environment Institute, Finland.
49. Todd, J., Brown, E.J.G. and Wells, E. (2003). Ecological design applied. Ecol. Engng., 20, 421-440.
50. Tucciarelli, T. (2003). A new algorithm for a robust solution of the fully dynamic Saint-Venant equations. J. Hydraul. Res., 41(3), 239-246.
51. Vazquez, F.R. (2004). Report on the Computation of ETo using Data for the Geel Station (Belgium) with Application to the Hydrological Modelling using the MIKE SHE Code. Rep. No. Internal Report, Laboratory of Hydraulics, Katholieke Uvinersiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
52. VLIZ: Flanders Marine Institute (2006). AMINAL Limnimetric or Hydrologic Monitoring Network Non-navigable Waterways. Available at: http://www.vliz.be/Vmdcdata/imis2/Dataset.php?show=html&dasid=451.
53. Willems, P. (2000). Probablistic Immission Modelling of Receiving Surface Waters. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Engineering, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.
54. Willems, P. (2003). WETSPRO: Water Engineering Time Series PROgramming Tool, Methodology and User's Manual ver.2.0. Leuven, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
55. Willems, P. (2005). Guidance Document for Calibration and Verification of Rainfall-runaff Models, K.U. Leuven Hydraulics Laboratory, Belgium.
56. Willems, P., Vaes, G., De Lannoy, G. and Verhoest, N. (2002). A Spatial Rainfall Model for Flanders (in Dutch: Een ruimtelijk neerslagmodel voor Vlaanderen). Rep. No. Study report for the Ministry of the Flemish Community (AMINAL, AWZ, Aquafin), Laboratory of Hydraulics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven; KMI, Leuven, Belgium.