The P600 reflects cost of new information in discourse memory

NeuroReport

Volumn 18, Issue 17, 2007, Pages 1851-1854

  Burkhardt, Petra ^a  

^a PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Discourse memory; Language processing; P600; Reference tracking; Semantic memory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; DISCOURSE MEMORY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; MEMORY; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; PARIETAL LOBE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTIC MEMORY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COMMUNICATION; COMPREHENSION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MENTAL PROCESSES; READING;

EID: 37349075780     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f1a999     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Kutas M, Federmeier KD. Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends Cogn Sci 2000; 4:463-470.
2. Burkhardt P. Inferential bridging relations reveal distinct neural mechanisms: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Brain Lang 2006; 98:159-168.
3. Rugg MD. The effects of semantic priming and word repetition on event-related potentials. Psychophysiology 1985; 22:642-647.
4. Van Berkum JJA, Koornneef AW, Otten M, Neuwland MS. Establishing reference in language comprehension: an electrophysiological perspective. Brain Res 2007; 1146:158-171.
5. Kaan E, Swaab TY. Repair, revision, and complexity in syntactic analysis: an electrophysiological differentiation. J Cogn Neurosci 2003; 15:98-110.
6. Kaan E, Dallas AC, Barkley CM. Processing bare quantifiers in discourse. Brain Res 2007; 1146:199-209.
7. Clark HH. Bridging. In: Nash-Webber B, Schank R, (eds). Theoretical issues in natural language processing. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Yale University Mathematical Society Sciences Board; 1975. pp. 188-193.
8. Osterhout L, Mobley LA. Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. J Mem Lang 1995; 34:739-773.
9. Hagoort P, Brown C, Groothusen J. The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Lang Cogn Processes 1993; 8:439-483.
10. Gunter TC, Stowe LA, Mulder G. When syntax meets semantics. Psychophysiology 1997; 34:660-676.
11. Hahne A, Friederici AD. Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: early automatic and late controlled processes. J Cogn Neurosci 1999; 11:194-205.
12. Kaan E, Harris A, Gibson E, Holcomb P. The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Lang Cogn Processes 2000; 15:159-201.
13. Osterhout L, Holcomb PJ. Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. J Mem Lang 1992; 31:785-806.
14. Friederici AD, Hahne A, Mecklinger A. Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: early and late event-related brain potential effects. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1996; 22:1219-1248.
15. Münte TF, Heinze H-J, Matzke M, Wieringa BM, Johannes S. Brain potentials and syntactic violations revisited: no evidence for specificity of the syntactic positive shift. Neuropsychologia 1998; 36:217-226.
16. Donchin E. Surprise!...Surprise? Psychophysiology 1981; 18:493-515.
17. Coulson S, King JW, Kutas M. Expect the unexpected: event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations. Lang Cogn Processes 1998; 13:21-58.
18. Sirevaag EJ, Kramer AF, Coles MGH, Donchin E. Resource reciprocity: an event-related brain potentials analysis. Acta Psychol 1989; 70:77-97.
19. Frisch S, Kotz SA, von Cramon DY, Friederici AD. Why the P600 is not just a P300: the role of the basal ganglia. Clin Neurophysiol 2003; 114:336-340.
20. Kim A, Osterhout L. The independence of combinatory semantic processing: evidence from event-related potentials. J Mem Lang 2005; 52:205-225.
21. Kuperberg GR, Kreher DA, Sitnikova T, Caplan DN, Holcomb PJ. The role of animacy and thematic relationships in processing active English sentences: evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Lang 2007; 100:223-237.
22. Van Herten M, Kolk HHJ, Chwilla DJ. An ERP study of P600 effects elicited by semantic anomalies. Cogn Brain Res 2005; 22:241-255.
23. Bornkessel I, Schlesewsky M. The extended argument dependency model: a neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages. Psychol Rev 2006; 113:787-821.