Stratus OCT in dominant optic atrophy: Features differentiating it from glaucoma

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 16, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 655-658

  Kim, Tae Woo ^a   Hwang, Jeong Min ^a  

^a Seoul National University Bundang Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Dominant optic atrophy; Glaucoma; retinal nerve fiber layer; Stratus OCT

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DISEASE COURSE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MALE; MEASUREMENT; NERVE FIBER; NERVE INJURY; OPTIC NERVE ATROPHY; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA NERVE CELL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MALE; NERVE FIBERS; OPTIC ATROPHY, AUTOSOMAL DOMINANT; RETINA; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE;

EID: 37349075359     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31804d23aa     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Kjer P. Infantile optic atrophy with dominant mode of inheritance: a clinical and genetic study of 19 Danish families. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl (Copenh). 1959;164:1-147.
2. Eliott D, Traboulsi EI, Maumenee IH. Visual prognosis in autosomal dominant optic atrophy (Kjer type). Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115:360-367.
3. Caldwell JB, Howard RO, Riggs LA. Dominant juvenile optic atrophy. A study in two families and review of hereditary disease in childhood. Arch Ophthalmol. 1971;85:133-147.
4. Hoyt CS. Autosomal dominant optic atrophy. A spectrum of disability. Ophthalmology. 1980;87:245-251.
5. Kline LB, Glaser JS. Dominant optic atrophy. The clinical profile. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979;97:1680-1686.
6. Jaeger W. Diagnosis of dominant infantile optic atrophy in early childhood. Ophthalmic Paediatr Genet. 1988;9:7-11.
7. Johnston PB, Gaster RN, Smith VC, et al. A clinicopathologic study of autosomal dominant optic atrophy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1979;88: 868-875.
8. Kjer P, Jensen OA, Klinken L. Histopathology of eye, optic nerve and brain in a case of dominant optic atrophy. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1983;61:300-312.
9. Harding GF, Crews SJ, Pitts SM. Psychophysical and visual evoked potential findings in hereditary optic atrophy. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1979;99:96-102.
10. Berninger TA, Jaeger W, Krastel H. Electrophysiology and colour perimetry in dominant infantile optic atrophy. Br J Ophthalmol. 1991;75:49-52.
11. Holder GE. Significance of abnormal pattern electroretinography in anterior visual pathway dysfunction. Br J Ophthalmol. 1987; 71:166-171.
12. Fournier AV, Damji KF, Epstein DL, et al. Disc excavation in dominant optic atrophy: differentiation from normal tension glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:1595-1602.
13. Votruba M, Thiselton D, Bhattacharya SS. Optic disc morphology of patients with OPA1 autosomal dominant optic atrophy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:48-53.
14. Johnston RL, Seller MJ, Behnam JT, et al. Dominant optic atrophy. Refining the clinical diagnostic criteria in light of genetic linkage studies. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:123-128.
15. Bennett SR, Alward WL, Folberg R. An autosomal dominant form of low-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;108: 238-244.
16. Williams-Lyn D, Flanagan J, Buys Y, et al. The genetic aspects of adult-onset glaucoma: a perspective from the Greater Toronto area. Can J Ophthalmol. 2000;35:12-17.
17. Kim JY, Hwang JM, Ko HS, et al. Mitochondrial DNA content is decreased in autosomal dominant optic atrophy. Neurology. 2005; 64:966-972.
18. Hart WM Jr, Becker B. The onset and evolution of glaucomatous visual field defects. Ophthalmology. 1982;89:268-279.
19. Hwang JM, Kim TW, Park KH, et al. Correlation between topographic profiles of localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects as determined by optical coherence tomography and red-free fundus photography. J Glaucoma. 2006;15:223-228.
20. Leske MC, Connell AM, Wu SY, et al. Incidence of open-angle glaucoma: the Barbados Eye Studies. The Barbados Eye Studies Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:89-95.
21. Grodum K, Heijl A, Bengtsson B. A comparison of glaucoma patients identified through mass screening and in routine clinical practice. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2002;80:627-631.