How 'special' is the human face? Evidence from an audiovisual temporal order judgment task

NeuroReport

Volumn 18, Issue 17, 2007, Pages 1807-1811

  Vatakis, Argiro ^a   Spence, Charles ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Animal calls; Audiovisual; Face inversion effect; Multisensory; Temporal perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; DECISION MAKING; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MONKEY; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISPLAY UNIT; VOCALIZATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; FACE; FEMALE; HAPLORHINI; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPECIES SPECIFICITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

EID: 37349068496     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f0d275     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Valentine T. Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. Br J Psychol 1988; 79:471-491.
2. Yin RK. Looking at upside-down faces. J Exp Psychol 1969; 81:141-145.
3. Diamond R, Carey S. Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. J Exp Psychol: Gen 1986; 115:107-117.
4. Rhodes G, Brake S, Atkinson AP. What's lost in inverted faces? Cognition 1993; 47:25-57.
5. Maurer D, Le Grand R, Mondloch CJ. The many faces of configural processing. Trends Cogn Sci 2002; 6:255-260.
6. Bertelson P, Vroomen J, Wiegeraad G, de Gelder B. Exploring the relation between McGurk interference and ventriloquism. Proc 1994 Int Conference Spoken Lang Processing (ICLP94) 1994; 2:559-562.
7. Green KP. The influence of an inverted face on the McGurk effect. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95:3014.
8. Jordan TR, Bevan K. Seeing and hearing rotated faces: influences of facial orientation on visual and audiovisual speech recognition. J Exp Psychol: Hum Perception Performance 1997; 23:388-403.
9. Calvert GA, Spence C, Stein BE, editors. The handbook of multisensory processing. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press; 2004.
10. Campbell R. The neuropsychology of lip-reading. Philos Trans Royal Soc London, Ser B: Biol Sci 1992; 335:39-45.
11. Vatakis A, Spence C. Investigating the effects of inversion on configural processing using an audiovisual temporal order judgment task. Perception (in press).
12. Bentin S, Allison T, Puce A, Perez E, McCarthy G. Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. J Cogn Neurosci 1996; 8:551-565.
13. Rosenblum LD, Yakel DA, Greene KG. Face and mouth inversion effects on visual and audiovisual speech perception. J Exp Psychol: Hum Perception Performance 2000; 26:806-819.
14. Ghazanfar AA, Maier JX, Hoffmann KL, Logothetis NK. Multisensory integration of dynamic faces and voices in rhesus monkey auditory cortex. J Neurosci 2005; 25:5004-5012.
15. Rossion B, Gauthier I, Goffaux V, Tarr MJ, Crommelinck M. Expertise training with novel objects leads to left-lateralized facelike electrophysiological responses. Psychol Sci 2002; 13:250-257.
16. Latinus M, Taylor MJ. Face processing stages: impact of difficulty and the separation of effects. Brain Res 2006; 1123:179-187.
17. Rosenblum LD, Saldaña HM. An audiovisual test of kinematic primitives for visual speech perception. J Exp Psychol: Hum Perception Performance 1996; 22:318-331.
18. Dahl CD, Logothetis NK, Hoffman KL. Individuation and holistic processing of faces in rhesus monkeys. Proc Royal Soc B 2007; 274:2069-2076.
19. Gauthier I, Tarr MJ. Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: bridging brain activity and behavior. J Exp Psychol: Hum Perception Performance 2002; 28:431-446.
20. Campbell RT, Landis T, Regard M. Face recognition and lip-reading: a neurological dissociation. Brain 1986; 109:509-521.
21. Yakel DA, Rosenblum LD, Fortier MA. Effects of talker variability on speech reading. Perception Psychophysics 2000; 62:1405-1412.
22. Ellis HD. Processes underlying face recognition. In: Bruyer R, editor. Neuropsychology of face perception and facial expression. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1989. pp. 471-478.
23. Massaro DW, Cohen MM. Perceiving speech from inverted faces. Perception Psychophysics 1996; 58:1047-1065.
24. Rosenblum LD, Niehus RP, Smith NM. Look who's talking: recognizing friends from visible articulation. Perception 2007; 36:157-159.