On the use of wireless response systems in experimental psychology: Implications for the behavioral researcher

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 816-823

  Langley, Moses M ^a,c   Cleary, Anne M ^b   Kostic, Bogdan N ^b  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^c Department of Statistics Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence Iowa State University 2438 Osborn Dr Ames   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 37349043650     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03192974     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. ANDERSON, J. R. (1974). Verbatim and prepositional representation of sentences in immediate and long-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 13, 149-162.
2. BODNER, G. E., & LINDSAY, D. S. (2003). Remembering and knowing in context. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 563-580.
3. BUNZ, U. (2005). Using scantron versus an audience response system for survey research: Does methodology matter when measuring computer-mediated communication competence? Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 343-359.
4. CARPENTER, S. K., & DELOSH, E. L. (2006). Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: Support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect. Memory & Cognition, 34, 268-276.
5. CHALLIS, B. H., VELICHKOVSKY, B. M, & CRAIK, F. I. M. (1996). Levels-of-processing effects on a variety of memory tasks: New findings and theoretical implications. Consciousness & Cognition, 5, 142-164.
6. CLARK, S. E. (1992). Word frequency effects in associative and item recognition. Memory & Cognition, 20, 231-243.
7. COHEN, J. ( 1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. CRAIK, F. I. M., & TULVING, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268-294.
9. GARDINER, J. M., JAVA, R. I., & RICHARDSON-KLAVEHN, A. (1996). How level of processing really influences awareness in recognition memory. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 114-122.
10. GERNSBACHER, M. A. (1985). Surface information loss in comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 324-363.
11. GLANZER, M., & ADAMS, J. K. (1990). The mirror effect in recognition memory: Data and theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory, & Cognition, 16, 5-16.
12. KUČERA, H., & FRANCIS, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
13. MORRIS, C. D., BRANSFORD, J. D., & FRANKS, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 16, 519-533.
14. ROEDIGER, H. L., III, & MCDERMOTT, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 803-814.
15. SHERIF, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper.
16. SLAMECKA, N. J., & GRAF, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 4, 592-604.
17. THAPAR, A., & GREENE, R. L. (1994). Effects of level of processing on implicit and explicit tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 671-679.
18. VOYER, D., RODGERS, M. A., & MCCORMICK, P. A. (2004). Timing conditions and the magnitude of gender differences on the metal rotation test. Memory & Cognition, 32, 72-82.
19. WELDON, M., & BELLINGER, K. D. (1997). Collective memory: Collaborative and individual processes in remembering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 1160-1175.
20. WILHITE, S. C. (1981). Word-frequency cueing effects: Recognition and encoding interference factors. American Journal of Psychology, 94, 323-337.