A meeting browser that learns

AAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn SS-07-04, Issue , 2007, Pages 33-40

  Ehlen, Patrick ^a   Purver, Matthew ^a   Niekrasz, John ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFIER MODELS; HIGH LEVEL DESCRIPTIONS;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION SERVICES; INFORMATION USE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; USER INTERFACES;

WEB BROWSERS;

EID: 37349029025     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Banerjee, S., and Rudnicky, A. 2004. Using simple speech-based features to detect the state of a meeting and the roles of the meeting participants. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (INTERSPEECH - ICSLP).
2. Banerjee, S., and Rudnicky, A. 2006. Smartnotes: Implicit labeling of meeting data through user note-taking and browsing. In Proceedings of the Human Language Techonolgy Conference of the NAACL, Companion Volume.
3. Banerjee, S.; Rosé, C.; and Rudnicky, A. 2005. The necessity of a meeting recording and playback system, and the benefit of topic-level annotations to meeting browsing. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (CHI).
4. Blei, D.; Ng, A.; and Jordan, M. 2003. Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3:993-1022.
5. Clark, H. H., and Schaefer, E. F. 1992. Arenas of Language Use. University of Chicago Press, chapter Dealing With Overhearers.
6. Corston-Oliver, S.; Ringger, E.; Gamon, M.; and Campbell, R. 2004. Task-focused summarization of email. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACL Workshop Text Summarization Branches Out.
7. Dielmann, A., and Renals, S. 2004. Dynamic Bayesian Networks for meeting structuring. In Proceedings of the 2004 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP).
8. Galley, M.; McKeown, K.; Fosler-Lussier, E.; and Jing, H. 2003. Discourse segmentation of multi-party conversation. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 562-569.
9. Gruenstein, A.; Niekrasz, J.; and Purver, M. 2005. Meeting structure annotation: data and tools. In Proceedings of the 6th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue.
10. Koumpis, K., and Renals, S. 2005. Content-based access to spoken audio. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 22(5):61-69.
11. Lisowska, A.; Popescu-Belis, A.; and Armstrong, S. 2004. User query analysis for the specification and evaluation of a dialogue processing and retrieval system. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC).
12. Morgan, W.; Chang, P.-C.; Gupta, S.; and Brenier, J. M. 2006. Automatically detecting action items in audio meeting recordings. In Proceedings of the 7th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, 96-103. Sydney, Australia: Association for Computational Linguistics.
13. Piolat, A.; Olive, T.; and Kellogg, R. T. 2005. Cognitive effort during note-taking. Applied Cognitive Psychology 19:291-312.
14. Purver, M.; Körding, K.; Griffiths, T.; and Tenenbaum, J. 2006. Unsupervised topic modelling for multi-party spoken discourse. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL), 17-24. Sydney, Australia: Association for Computational Linguistics.
15. Purver, M.; Ehlen, P.; and Niekrasz, J. 2006. Detecting action items in multi-party meetings: Annotation and initial experiments. In S. Renals, S. Bengio, and J. Fiscus, eds., Machine Learning for Multimodal Interaction, volume 4299 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 200-211. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
16. Reiter, S., and Rigoll, G. 2004. Segmentation and classification of meeting events using multiple classifier fusion and dynamic programming. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition.
17. Schober, M. F., and Clark, H. H. 1989. Understanding by addressees and overhearers. Cognitive Psychology 21:211-232.
18. Tucker, S., and Whittaker, S. 2004. Accessing multimodal meeting data: Systems, problems and possibilities. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Multimodal Interaction and Related Machine Learning Algorithms (MLMI).
19. Whittaker, S.; Laban, R.; and Tucker, S. 2005. Analysing meeting records: An ethnographic study and technological implications. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Multimodal Interaction and Related Machine Learning Algorithms (MLMI).