What do Louisiana and Mississippi nonindustrial private forest landowners think about forest certification?

Southern Journal of Applied Forestry

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 170-175

  Perera, Priyan ^a   Vlosky, Richard P ^a   Hughes, Glenn ^b   Dunn, Michael A ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AGRICULTURAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Mississippi State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Certification; Louisiana; Mississippi; Nonindustrial private forest land owners

Indexed keywords

LAND USE; MANAGEMENT; PRIVATIZATION; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; TIMBER;

NONINDUSTRIAL PRIVATE FOREST LANDOWNERS; PUBLIC LANDS;

FORESTRY;

FOREST MANAGEMENT; LAND USE; MANAGEMENT; ORGANIZATIONS; PRIVATE OWNERSHIP;

EID: 37349023579     PISSN: 01484419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sjaf/31.4.170     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. AULD, G., B. CASHORE, AND D. NEWSOM. 2001. A look at forest certification through the eyes of United States Wood and Paper Producers. Global Initiatives and Public Policies: First International Conference on Private Forestry in the 21st Century, March 2001, Atlanta, GA.
2. AULD, G., B. CASHORE, AND D. NEWSOM. 2003. Perspectives on forest certification: A survey examining the differences among the forest sector's views of their forest certification alternatives. P. 271-282 in Forest Policy for Private Forestry: Global and Regional Challenges, Teeter. L, B. Cashore, and D. Zhangh (eds.). CAB Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon, UK.
3. BLISS, J.C., S.K. NEPAL, R.T. BROOKS, AND M.D. LARSEN. 1997. In the mainstream: Environmental attitudes of Mid-South forest owners. South. J. Appl. For. 21(1): 37-43.
4. BUTLER, B.J., AND E.C. LEATHERBERRY. 2004. America's family forest owners. J. For. 102(7):4-14.
5. CONNER, R.C., AND A. J. HARTSELL. 2002. Forest area and conditions. P. 357-402 in Southern Forest Resource Assessment Technical Report, Wear, D.N., and J.G. Greis (eds.). US For. Serv. Gen. Tech Rep. SRS-053. Asheville, NC.
6. DILLMAN, D.A. 2000. Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd Ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. 464 p.
7. FREY, P. 2006. 2005 Louisiana forestry facts. Louisiana Department of Agriculture & Forestry, Baton Rouge, LA. 1 p.
8. HUBBARD, W.G. 1999. Economic impact of forestry and forest products in the rural South. South. Perspect. 3(16):2-5.
9. HUGHES, H.G., S. GRADO, AND M. MEASELLS. 2003. Developing strategies for education of underserved forest landowners. Final Progress Report to Southern SARE, Project No. LS01-129. 8 p.
10. HULL, R.B., AND S.I. STEWART. 2002. Social consequences of change in the wildland- urban interface forest. P. 115-132 in Human influences on forest ecosystems: The Southern wildland-urban interface assessment, Macei, EA., and L.A. Harmanson (eds.). Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-55. US For. Serv. Southern Res. Stn., Asheville, NC. 159 p.
11. JACOBSON, M., E. JONES, AND F. CUBBAGE. 1996. Landowner attitudes toward landscape-level management. P. 417-425 in Proc. of the symp. on Non-industrial private forests: Learning ftom the past, prospects for the future, Baughman, M.J. (ed.). Minnesota Extension Service, St. Paul, MN.
12. KANOWSKI, P.J., D. SINCLAIR, AND B. FREEMAN. 1999. International approaches to forest management certification and labeling of forest products: A review. Australian Government Dept. of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry. Barton, Australia. 47 p.
13. LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AGRICULTURAL CENTER. 2006. 2005 progress report. Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA. 1 p.
14. MEASELLS, M. K., S.C. GRADO, AND G. HUGHES. (No date). The status of Mississippi forest landowners. Publication FO369. Forest and Wildlife Res. Ctr., Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS.
15. NEWSOM, D., B. CASHORE, G. AULD, AND J.E. GRANsKOG. 2003. Forest certification in the heart of Dixie: A survey of Alabama landowners. P. 291-300 in Forest Policy for Private Forestry: Global and Regional Challenges, Teeter, L., B. Cashore, and D. Zhangh (eds.). CAB International.
16. PRESTEMON, J.P., AND R.C. ABT. 2002. Chapter 13: Timber products supply and demand. P. 299-325 in Southern Forest Resource Assessment Technical Report, Wear, D.N., and J.G. Greis (eds.). US For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-053. Asheville, NC.
17. SMITH, W.B., P.D. MILES, J.S. VISSAGE, AND S. A. PUGH. 2004. Forest resources of the United States, 2002. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-241. US For. Serv., North Central Res. Stn., St. Paul, MN. 137 p.
18. TARRANT, M.A., AND R.B. HULL. 2004. Forest Values and Attitudes in the South: Past and Future Research. P. 231-239 in Southern forest science: Past, present and future, Rauscher, H.M., and K. Johnsen (eds.). Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-75. US For. Serv. Southern Res. Ctr., Asheville, N.C.
19. UNITED NATIONS FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION. 2001. State of the world's forests. United Nations Food andAgriculture Organization, Rome. 100 p.
20. VLOSKY, R.P. 2000. Certification: Perceptions of non-industrial private forestland owners in Louisiana. Working Paper 41, Louisiana Forest Products Laboratory, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA. 12 p.
21. VLOSKY, R.P., AND L.K OZANNE. 1997. Forest products certification: The business customer perspective. Wood Fiber Sci. 29(2):195-208.
22. WEAR, D.N., AND GREIS, J.G. 2002. Southern forest resource assessment: Summary of findings. J. For. 100(7):6-13.
23. WILLIAMS, R.A., VOTH, D.E., AND HITT, C. 1996. Arkansas' NIPF landowners' opinions and attitudes regarding management and use of forested property. P. 230 -237 in Proc. of the symp. on Non-industrial private forests: Learning from the past, prospects for the future, Baughman, M. J. (ed.). Minnesota Extension Service, St. Paul, MN.
24. ZAKRESKI, S., S.C. DOAK, AND M. EVERTZ. 2004. Matching business values with forest certification systems. Metafore, Portland, OR. 31 p.