Response of upland rice in soils with low content of phosphorus;Resposta fenotípica de arroz de terras altas ao estresse de fósforo no solo

Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 578-584

  Guimarães, Cleber M ^a   Stone, Luís F ^a   Neves, Péricles C F ^a  

^a EMBRAPA CERRADOS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Oryza sativa L.; P efficient and non efficient cultivars; Phosphorus use efficiency index

Indexed keywords

ORYZA SATIVA;

EID: 37349011118     PISSN: 14154366     EISSN: 18071929     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1415-43662007000600005     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Aboulroos, S. A.; Nielsen, N. E. Effects of phosphorus placement in varying, confined volumes of soil on fineness and density of barley roots and the mean rate of nutrient uptake per root unit. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Stockholm, v.29, n.4, p.331-336, 1979.
2. Claessen, M. E. C. (Org.). Manual de métodos de análise de solo. 2.ed. rev. atual. Rio de Janeiro: Embrapa-CNPS, 1997. 212p. (Documentos, 1)
3. Dobermann, A.; Cassman, K. G.; Mamaril, C. P.; Sheehy, J. E. Management of phosphorus, potassium, and sulfur in intensive, irrigated lowland rice. Field Crops Research, Amsterdam, v.56, p.113-138, 1998.
4. Eissenstar, D. M. Costs and benefits of construction roots of small diameter. Journal of Plant Nutrition, New York, v.15, p.763-782, 1992.
5. Fageria, N. K. Tolerância diferencial de cultivares de arroz ao alumínio em solução nutritiva. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, v.17, n.1, p.1-9, 1982.
6. Fageria, N. K. Nutrição mineral. In: Vieira, N. R. de A.; Santos, A. B. dos; Sant'Ana, E. P. (eds.). A cultura do arroz no Brasil. Santo Antônio de Goiás: Embrapa Arroz e Feijão, 1999. p.172-196.
7. Fageria, N. K.; Baligar, V. C. Upland rice genotypes evaluation for phosphorus use efficiency. Journal of Plant Nutrition, New York, v.20, n.4/5, p.499-509, 1997.
8. Fisher, R. A.; Maurer, R. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Journal of Agricultural Research, Victoria, v.29, p.897-912, 1978.
9. Gahoonia, T. S.; Nielsen N. E. Variation in root hairs of barley cultivars doubled soil phosphorus uptake. Euphytica, Wageningen, v.98, p.177-182, 1997.
10. Gourley, C. J. P.; Allan, D. L.; Russelle, M. P. Defining phosphorus efficiency in plants. Plant and Soil, The Hague, v.156, p.289-292, 1993.
11. Haynes, R. J.; Ludecke, T. E. Yield, root morphology and chemical composition of two legumes as affected by lime and phosphorus applications to an acid soil. Plant and Soil, The Hague, v.62, p.241-254, 1981
12. Horst, W. J.; Kamh, M.; Jibrin, J. M.; Chude, V. O. Agronomic measures for increasing P availability to crops. Plant and Soil, The Hague, v.237, p.211-223, 2001.
13. Lynch, J. P.; Brown, K. M. Topsoil foraging: an architectural adaptation of plants to low phosphorus availability. Plant and Soil, The Hague, v.237, p.225-237, 2001.
14. Otani, T.; Ae, N. Sensitivity of phosphorus uptake to change in root length and soil volume. Agronomy Journal, Madison, v.88, p.371-375, 1996.
15. Sanchez, P. A.; Salinas, J. G. Low-input technology for managing oxisols and ultisols in tropical America. Advances in Agronomy, New York, v.34, p.279-406, 1981.
16. Sattelmacher, B.; Horst, W. J.; Becker, H. C. Factors that contribute to genetic variation for nutrient efficiency of crop plants. Zeitschrift fur Pflanzenernaehrung und Bodenkunde, Berlin, v.157, p.215-224, 1994.
17. Wissuwa, M. How do plants achieve tolerance to phosphorus deficiency - small causes with big effects. Plant Physiology, Bethesda, v.133, p.1947-1958, 2003.
18. Wissuwa, M. Combining a modeling with a genetic approach in establishing associations between genetic and physiological effects in relation to phosphorus uptake. Plant and Soil, The Hague, v.269, n.1/2, p.57-68, 2005.
19. Wissuwa, M.; Ae, N. Genotypic variation for tolerance to phosphorus deficiency in rice and the potential for its exploitation in rice improvement, Plant Breeding, The Hague, v.120, p.43-48, 2001.