Effect of low frequencies and mixed wave of ultrasound and EDTA on flux recovery and cleaning of microfiltration membranes

Separation and Purification Technology

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 67-73

  Maskooki, Abdolmajid ^a   Kobayashi, Takaomi ^b   Mortazavi, Seid Ali ^c   Maskooki, Arash ^c  

^a Khorasan Science & Technology Park   (Iran)

^b NAGAOKA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^c FERDOWSI UNIVERSITY OF MASHHAD   (Iran)

Author keywords

Cleaning efficiency; EDTA; Fouling; Membrane cleaning; Mixed wave ultrasound

Indexed keywords

CLEANING; MICROFILTRATION; POLYNOMIAL APPROXIMATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; ULTRASONIC EFFECTS;

CLEANING EFFICIENCY; FLUX RECOVERY; MEMBRANE CLEANING; MIXED WAVE ULTRASOUND;

ION EXCHANGE MEMBRANES;

EID: 37349002408     PISSN: 13835866     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2007.05.028     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Forbes M. Cross flow microfiltration. Aust. J. Biotechnol. 1 1 (1987) 30-33
2. Xu-Jiang Y., Dodds J., Leclerc D., and Lenoel M. A technique for the study of the fouling of microfiltration membranes using two membranes in series. J. Membr. Sci. 105 (1995) 23
3. American Water Works Association. Water Quality and Treatment: A Handbook of Community Water Supplies (1990), McGraw-Hill, PA
4. Seng Ang W., Lee S., and Elimelech M. Chemical and physical aspects of cleaning of organic-fouled reverse osmosis membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 272 (2006) 198-210
5. Lindau J., and Jonsson A.S. Adsorptive fouling of modified and unmodified commercial polymeric ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 160 (1999) 65
6. Liikanen R., Yli-Kuivila J., and Laukkanen R. Efficiency of various chemical cleanings for nanofiltration membrane fouled by conventionally-treated surface water. J Membr. Sci. 195 (2002) 265-276
7. Suslick K.S. Ultrasound: It's Chemical, Physical, and Biological Effects (1988), VCH, PA
8. Kobayashi T., Hosaka Y., and Fujii N. Ultrasound-enhanced membrane-cleaning processes applied water treatments: influence of sonic frequency on filtration treatments. Ultrasonic 41 (2003) 185-190
9. Muthukumaran S., Kentish S.E., Ashokkumar M.A., and Stevens G.W. Mechanisms for the ultrasonic enhancement of dairy whey ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 258 (2005) 106-114
10. Chai X., Kobayashi T., and Fujii N. Ultrasound associated cleaning of polymeric membranes for water treatment. Separ. Purif. Technol. 15 (1999) 139-146
11. Kabayash T., Chai X., and Fujii N. Ultrasound effect on cross-flow membrane filtration of polyacrylonitrite ultrafiltrations. Separ. Purif. Technol. 17 (1999) 31-40
12. Mohammadi T., Madaeni S.S., and Moghadam M.K. Investigation of membrane fouling Euromed Conf. Proc., vol. 1, no. (1) 1. Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt (2002) 4-6
13. Mores W.D., and Davis R.H. Direct observation of membrane cleaning via rapid back pulsing. Desalination 146 (2002) 135-140
14. Li Q., and Elimelech M. Natural organic matter fouling and chemical cleaning of nanofiltration membranes. Water Sci. Technol.: Water Supply 4 5-6 (2004) 245-251
15. Mulder M. Basic Principles of Membrane Technology (1991), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, PA p. 181
16. Li J., Sanderson R.D., and Jacobs E.P. Ultrasonic cleaning of nylon microfiltration membranes fouled by kraft paper mill effluent. J. Membr. Sci. 205 (2002) 247-257