Analysis of variance for repeated measures designs with word materials as a nested random or fixed factor

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 735-747

  Rietveld, Toni ^a   Van Hout, Roeland ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 37349001694     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03192964     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. ALLISON, P. D. (2002). Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. BAAYEN, R. H., TWEEDIE, F. J., & SCHREUDER, R. (2002). The subjects as a simple random effect fallacy: Subject variability and morphological family effects in the mental lexicon. Brain & Language, 81, 55-65.
3. CLARK, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 12, 335-359.
4. 2 a source of Type 1 or Type 2 error? Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 18, 243-256.
5. 2, F'′ and Min F′. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 15, 135-142.
6. GORNBEIN, J. A., LAZARO, C. G., & LITTLE, R. A. (1992). Incomplete data in repeated measures analysis. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 1, 275-295.
7. GUEORGUIEVA, R., & KRYSTAL, J. K. (2004). More over ANOVA: Progress in analyzing repeated measures data and its reflection in papers published in the Archives of General Psychiatry. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61, 310-317.
8. HUYNH, H. S., & FELDT, L. S. (1976). Estimation of the box correction for degrees of freedom. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1, 69-82.
9. KIRK, R. E. (1995). Experimental designs: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Belmont: Brooks/Cole.
10. LEVENE, H. (1960). Robust tests for equality of variances. In I. Olkin (Ed.), Contributions to probability and statistics (pp. 278-292). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11. LITTLE, R. J. A., & RUBIN, D. B.( 1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley.
12. MAXWELL, S. E., & BRAY, J. H. (1986). Robustness of the quasi F statistic to violations of sphericity. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 416-421.
13. QUENÉ, H., & VAN DEN BERGH, H. (2004). On multi-level modeling of data from repeated measures designs: A tutorial. Speech Communication, 43, 103-121.
14. RAAIJMAKERS, J. G. W., SCHRIJNEMAKERS, J. M. C., & GREMMEN, F. (1999). How to deal with "the language-as-fixed-effect fallacy": Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. Journal of Memory & Language, 41, 416-426.
15. RIETVELD, T., & VAN HOUT, R. (2005). Statistics in language research: Analysis of variance. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
16. RIETVELD, T., VAN HOUT, R., & ERNESTUS, M. (2004). Pitfalls in corpus linguistics. Computers & the Humanities, 38, 343-362.
17. SCHREUDER, R., BURANI, C., & BAAIJEN, R. H. (2003). Parsing and semantic opacity. In E. M. H. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words (pp. 159-189). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
18. WICKENS, T. D., & KEPPEL, G. (1983). On the choice of design and of test statistics in the analysis of experiments with sampled materials. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 22, 296-309.
19. WILCOX, R. R. (1987). New designs in analysis of variance. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 29-60.
20. WINER, B. J., BROWN, D. R., & MICHELS, K. M. (1991). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.