Characteristics of habituation to motion in a virtual environment

Displays

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 117-123

  Howarth, Peter A ^a   Hodder, Simon G ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Motion sickness; Nausea; Ocular symptoms; Visually induced motion sickness (VIMS)

Indexed keywords

INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GRAPHICS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

MOTION SICKNESS; OCULAR SYMPTOMS; VISUALLY INDUCED MOTION SICKNESS (VIMS);

MOTION ESTIMATION;

EID: 37249080800     PISSN: 01419382     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.displa.2007.09.009     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Regan E.C., and Price K.R. The frequency of occurrence and severity of side-effects of immersion virtual reality. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 65 6 (1994) 527-530
2. Howarth P.A., and Finch M. The nauseogenicity of two methods of navigating within a virtual environment. Appl. Ergonom. 30 1 (1999) 39-45
3. Howarth P.A., and Costello P.J. The occurrence of virtual simulation sickness when a HMD was used as a personal viewing system. Displays 18 (1997) 107-116
4. Nichols S., and Patel H. Health and safety implications of virtual reality: a review of empirical evidence. Appl. Ergonom. 33 3 (2002) 251-271
5. Stanney K.M., Mourant R.R., and Kennedy R.S. Human factors issues in virtual environments: a review of the literature. Presence Teleop. Virtual Environ. 7 4 (1998) 327-351
6. Lawson B., et al. Signs and symptoms of human syndromes associated with synthetic experiences. In: Stanney K.M. (Ed). Handbook of Virtual Environments: Design, Implementation, and Applications (2002), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 589-618
7. P.A. Howarth, K.J. Hill, The maintenance of habituation to virtual simulation sickness, in: Human-Computer Interaction: Ergonomics and User Interfaces. Proceedings of HCI99, August 22-26, 1999, Munich, Germany.
8. Biocca F.A., and Rolland J.P. Virtual eyes can rearrange your body: adaptation to visual displacement in see-through, head-mounted displays. Presence Teleop. Virtual Environ. 7 3 (1998) 262-277
9. Regan E.C. Some evidence of adaptation to immersion in virtual reality. Displays 16 3 (1995) 135-139
10. Stern R.M., et al. Adaptation to vection-induced symptoms of motion sickness. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 60 6 (1989) 566-572
11. Kennedy R.S., Stanney K.M., and Dunlap W.P. Duration and exposure to virtual environments: sickness curves during and across sessions. Presence Teleop. Virtual Environ. 9 5 (2000) 463-472
12. Stott J.R.R. Adaptation to nauseogenic motion stimuli and its application in the treatment of airsickness. In: Crampton G.H. (Ed). Motion and Space Sickness (1990), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL 373-390
13. Griffin, M.J., Motion sickness, in: Handbook of Human Vibration, Academic Press, 1990.
14. Bagshaw M., and Stott J.R.R. The desensitisation of chronically motion sick aircrew in the Royal Air Force. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 56 (1985) 1144-1151
15. Golding J.F., and Stott J.R. Effect of sickness severity on habituation to repeated motion challenges in aircrew referred for air sickness treatment. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 66 7 (1995) 625-630
16. Howarth P.A., and Costello P.J. The development of a visual test battery for virtual reality users. In: Robertson S.A. (Ed). Contemporary Ergonomics (1997), Taylor and Francis, London 109-116
17. Hodder S., and Howarth P.A. Habituation of virtual simulation sickness: preliminary results. In: de Waard D., et al. (Ed). Human Factors in the Age of Virtual Reality (2003), Shaker Publishing, Maastricht, the Netherlands 73-80
18. P.J. Costello, P.A. Howarth, The visual effects of immersion in four virtual environments, VISERG Report, Produced under HSE Research Contract 3181/R53.133, 1996.
19. Bailey L., and Lovie J.E. New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 53 (1976) 740-745
20. Kennedy R.S., et al. Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 3 3 (1993) 203-220
21. Howarth P.A. Oculomotor changes within virtual environments. Appl. Ergonom. 30 1 (1999) 59-67
22. Meddis R. Unified analysis of variance by ranks. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 33 (1980) 84-98
23. Hill K.J., and Howarth P.A. Habituation to the side effects of immersion in a virtual environment. Displays 21 1 (2000) 25-30
24. Lo W.T., and So R.H. Cybersickness in the presence of scene rotational movements along different axes. Appl. Ergonom. 32 1 (2001) 1-14
25. So R.H., Lo W.T., and Ho A.T. Effects of navigation speed on motion sickness caused by an immersive virtual environment. Hum. Factors 43 3 (2001) 452-461
26. Diels C. Active versus Passive Interaction with Virtual Environments - An Investigation into the Effect of Control on Adverse Symptoms in Virtual Environments, Department of Psychonomics (2004), Utrecht University, Utrecht
27. Hu S., and Stern R.M. The retention of adaptation to motion sickness eliciting stimulation. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 70 8 (1999) 766-768
28. Biocca F.A. Will simulation sickness slow down the diffusion of virtual environment technology?. Presence Teleop. Virtual Environ. 1 3 (1992) 334-343