The impact on learning of generating vs. selecting descriptions in analyzing algebra example solutions

ICLS 2006 - International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Proceedings

Volumn 1, Issue , 2006, Pages 99-105

  Corbett, Albert ^a   Wagner, Angela ^a   Lesgold, Sharon ^a   Ulrich, Harry ^a   Stevens, Scott ^a  

^a Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGEBRAIC MODELS; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM; REAL-WORLD PROBLEM; SELF EXPLANATIONS; SELF-GENERATION; STUDENT LEARNING;

ALGEBRA; COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION COMPUTING; SCAFFOLDS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 37249077778     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Aleven, V.A. and Koedinger, K.R. (2002). An effective metacognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor. Cognitive Science, 26, 147-179.
2. th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education, 39-46. Washington D.C IOS Press.
3. Bielaczyc, K, Pirolli, P. and Brown, A. (1995). Training in self-explanation and self-regulation strategies: Investigating the effects of knowledge acquisition strategies on problem solving. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 221-252.
4. Chi, M.T.H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M., Reimann, P. and Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
5. Chi, M.T.H, de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M. and LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 429-477.
6. Conati, C. and VanLehn, K. (2000). Toward computer-based support for meta-cognitive skills: A computational framework to coach self-explanation. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11, 398-415.
7. Corbett, A.T., McLaughlin, M.S., Scarpinatto, K.C. and Hadley, W.S. (2000). Analyzing and generating mathematical models: An Algebra II Cognitive Tutor design study. In G. Gauthier, C. Frasson & K. VanLehn (Eds), Intelligent tutoring systems: Fifth international conference, ITS'2000, 314-323. New York: Springer.
8. th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education, 133-140. Washington D.C IOS Press.
9. Graesser, A.C., Person, N., Harter, D. and The Tutoring Research Group (2001). Teaching tactics and dialog in AutoTutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 257-279.
10. Renkl, A. (1997). Learning from worked-out examples: A study on individual differences. Cognitive Science, 21, 1-29.
11. Renkl, A. (1999) Learning mathematics from worked-out examples: Analyzing and fostering self-explanations. European Journal of Psychology in Education, 16, 477-488.
12. Stevens, S.M. and Marinelli, D. (1998). Synthetic Interviews: The Art of Creating a 'Dyad' Between Humans and Machine-Based Characters. Proceedings of the 4th IEEE Workshop on Interactive Voice Technology for Telecommunications Applications, 43-48. New York: IEEE.
13. th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 1017-1022. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.