Major sporting events - Planning for legacy

Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Municipal Engineer

Volumn 160, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 171-176

  Taylor, Maureen ^a   Edmondson, Lain ^a  

^a PmpLEGACY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Buildings, structures design; Planning and scheduling; Urban regeneration

Indexed keywords

SCHEDULING; URBAN PLANNING;

COORDINATED VENUE MANAGEMENT; PRIVATE SECTOR FUNDING; SOCIO-ECONOMIC LEGACY; STAKEHOLDERS;

PLANNING;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; CONFERENCE PROCEEDING; INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING; SPORT; STAKEHOLDER; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN RENEWAL;

ENGLAND; EURASIA; EUROPE; LONDON [ENGLAND]; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 37249071984     PISSN: 09650903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1680/muen.2007.160.4.171     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. DE COUBERTIN P. Olympic Review, April 1911, pp. 59-62.
2. INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE. Candidate City Questionnaire for the Games of the Olympiad in 2012, Theme 1-Olympic Games Concept & Legacy. IOC, Lausanne, 2005.
3. INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE. International Symposium on Legacy of the Olympic Games 1984-2000. IOC, Lausanne, 2002.
4. BOHLMANN H. R. Predicting the Economic Impact of the 2010 FIFA World Cup on South Africa. University of Pretoria, 2005, Working paper 2006-11.
5. ECONOMICS RESEARCH ASSOCIATES (ERA). Community Economic Impact of the 1984 Olympic games in Los Angeles and Southern California. Los Angeles Olympic Organizing committee, Los Angeles, 1984.
6. DE MORAGAS SPÀ M. and BOTELLA M. (eds) The Keys of Success: The Social, Sporting, Economic and Communications Impact of Barcelona'92. Servei de Publicacions de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, 1995.
7. See www.austrade.gov.au/Business-success-at-AsianGames-2006.
8. PRICEWATERHOUSE COOPERS. Business and Economic Benefits of the Sydney 2002 Games: A Collation of Evidence. PWC, New York, 2000.
9. DALY E. and FICKLING D. Barcelona and Sydney: the hosts who got the most. Observer, 8 December 2002, p. 18.
10. OLYMPIC GAMES STUDY COMMISSION. Report to the 115th IOC Session. International Olympic Committee, Prague, 2003, pp. 21-37.
11. See http://www.london2012.com.
12. GREATER LONDON AUTHORITY. The London Plan. GLA, London, 2004.
13. London 2012. Candidate File 2004. http://www.london 2012.com.
14. DEPARTMENT FOR CULTURE, MEDIA AND SPORT. Olympic Games Impact Study. The Stationery Office, 2005.
15. GLOBAL MARKETS INSITE INC. Anholt Nation Brands Index Q3. GMI Inc., London, 2006.