Reconstruction methods for incomplete fuzzy preference relations: A numerical comparison

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4578 LNAI, Issue , 2007, Pages 86-93

  Brunelli, Matteo ^a   Fedrizzi, Michele ^a   Giove, Silvio ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

^b CA' FOSCARI UNIVERSITY OF VENICE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; NUMERICAL METHODS;

RECONSTRUCTION METHODS;

FUZZY LOGIC;

EID: 37249071864     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-73400-0_11     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Barzilai, J.: Consistency measures for pairwise comparison matrices. J. Multi-Crit. Decis. Anal. 7, 123-132 (1998)
2. Brunelli, M., Fedrizzi, Michele: A note on the paper Goal programming models for obtaining the priority vector of incomplete fuzzy preference relation, submitted to International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (2007)
3. Chen, Q., Triantaphyllou, E.: Estimating Data for Multi-Criteria Decision Making Problems: Optimization Techniques. In: Pardalos, P.M., Floudas, C. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Optimization, vol. 2, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA (2001)
4. Chiclana, F., Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Integrating multiplicative preference relations in a multipurpose decision-making model based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 122, 277-291 (2001)
5. Chu, A.T.W., Kalaba, R.E., Springarn, K.: A comparison of two methods for determining the weights of belonging to fuzzy sets. J. Optim. Th. Appl. 27, 321-538 (1979)
6. Fedrizzi, Michele: On a consensus measure in a group MCDM problem. In: Kacprzyk, J., Fedrizzi, M. (eds.) Multiperson Decision Making Models using Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory (Theory and Decision Library, series B: Mathematical and Statistical Methods, Vol. 18), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands (1990)
7. Fedrizzi, Michele, Giove, S.: Incomplete pairwise comparison and consistency optimization. European Journal of Operational Research (2006) doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.09.065
8. Harker, P.T.: Alternative modes of questioning in the analytic hierarcy process. Mathl Modelling 9(3-5), 353-360 (1987)
9. Harker, P.T.: Incomplete pairwise comparisons in the analytic hierarcy process. Mathl Modelling 9(11), 837-848 (1987)
10. Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., Chiclana, F., Luque, M.: Some Issues on Consistency of Fuzzy Preference Relations. European Journal of Operational Research 154, 98-109 (2004)
11. Herrera-Viedma, E., Chiclana, F., Herrera, F., Alonso, S.: Group decision-making model with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. B. Cybern. 37(1), 176-189 (2007)
12. Kacprzyk, J., Roubens, M.: Non-Conventional Preference Relations in Decision-Making. Springer, Berlin (1988)
13. Kwiesielewicz, M.: The logaritmic least squares and the generalized pseudoinverse in estimating ratios. European Journal of Operational Research 93, 611-619 (1996)
14. Kwiesielewicz, M., van Uden, E.: Ranking Decision Variants by Subjective Paired Comparisons in Cases with Incomplete Data. In: Kumar, V. (ed.) ICCSA 2003. LNCS, vol. 2667, Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
15. Nishizawa, K.: Estimation of unknown comparisons in incomplete AHP and it's compensation. Report of the Research Institute of Industrial Technology, Nihon University (77) (2004)
16. Orlovsky, S.A.: Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1, 155-167 (1978)
17. Peláez, J.I., Lamata, M.T.: A new measure of consistency for positive reciprocal matrices. Computers and Mathematics with Applications 46, 1839-1845 (2003)
18. Saaty, T.L.: The Analytical Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)
19. Saaty, T.L., Vargas, L.G.: Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analythical hierarchy process. Kluwer Academic, Boston (2001)
20. Shiraishi, S., Obata, T., Daigo, M.: Properties of a positive reciprocal matrix and their application to AHP. J. Oper. Res. Soc. Japan 41, 404-414 (1998)
21. Takeda, E., Yu, P.L.: Assessing priority weights from subsets of pairwise comparisons in multiple criteria optimization problems. European Journal of Operational Research 86, 315-331 (1995)
22. Tanino, T.: Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 12, 117-131 (1984)
23. van Uden, E.: Estimating missing data in pairwise comparison matrices. In: Bubnicki, Z., Hryniewicz, O., Kulikowski, R. (eds.) Operational and Systems Research in the Face to Challenge the XXI Century, Methods and Techniques in Information Analysis and Decision Making, Academic Printing House, Warsaw (2002)
24. Xu, Z.S.: Goal programming models for obtaining the priority vector of incomplete fuzzy preference relation. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 36, 261-270 (2004)
25. Xu, Z.S.: A procedure for decision making based on incomplete fuzzy preference relation. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making 4, 175-189 (2005)
26. Xu, Z.S.: A least deviation method to obtain a priority vector of a fuzzy preference relation. European Journal of Operational Research 164, 206-216 (2005)