Doha development agenda: Implications for the US and world cotton markets

Journal of International Trade and Economic Development

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 135-153

  Fadiga, Mohamadou L ^a   Mohanty, Samarendu ^a   Welch, Mark ^a   Pan, Suwen ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cotton; Net farm income; Subsidies; Tariffs; United States; WTO

Indexed keywords

COTTON; INCOME; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; MARKET; SUBSIDY SYSTEM; TARIFF STRUCTURE; TRADE LIBERALIZATION; WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM;

EID: 37249068015     PISSN: 09638199     EISSN: 14699559     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09638190701728115     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Fadiga, M. L., Mohanty, S. and Pan, S. (2005) The impacts of the U.S. cotton program on the west and central African countries cotton export earnings. Agricultural Economics Review, 2, pp. 50-60.
2. Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) (2004) FAPRI 2004 U.S. Baseline Briefing Book, FAPRI-UMC Technical Data Report 01-04, University of Missouri
3. Gardner, B. (2002) U.S. agricultural policies since 1995, with a focus on market effects in grains and oilseeds. Working Paper 02-17 Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics (University of Maryland), Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics (University of Maryland)
4. Pan, S., Fadiga, M., Mohanty, S. and Ethridge, D. (2004) Structural models of the U.S. and rest-of-the-world natural fiber markets. Working Paper CER 04-03 Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics (Texas Tech University), Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics (Texas Tech University)
5. Pan, S., Welch, M., Mohanty, S., Fadiga, M. L. and Ethridge, D. (2005) Chinese tariff rate quota vs. U.S. subsidies: What affects the world cotton market more?. Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, 6:2, pp. 251-273.
6. Poonyth, D., Sarris, A., Sharma, R. and Shui, S. (2004) The impact of domestic and trade policies on the world cotton market. Commodity and Trade Policy Research Working Paper No. 8 (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
7. Richardson, J. W., Klose, S. L. and Gray, A. W. (2000) An applied procedure for estimating and simulating multivariate empirical probability distributions in farm-level risk assessment and policy analysis management. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 32, pp. 299-315.
8. Sumner, D. (2003) Implications of U.S. farm bill of 2002 for agricultural trade and trade negotiations. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 46, pp. 99-22.
9. Tokarick, S. (2003) Measuring the impact of distortions in agricultural trade in partial and general equilibrium. IMF Working Paper WP/03/110 (International Monetary Fund, (International Monetary Fund
10. US Trade Representative (2005) U.S. proposal for bold reform in global agriculture trade.
11. Westcott, P. (2005) Counter-cyclical payments under the 2002 Farm Act: production effects likely to be limited. Choices, 20, pp. e201-e05.
12. Westhoff, P., Brown, S. and Hart, C. (2005) When point estimates miss the point: Stochastic modeling of WTO restrictions. Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute Working Paper #01-05 (University of Missouri, (University of Missouri
13. World Trade Organization (2005) Doha Work Program. Draft Ministerial Declaration. Document Code TN/MIN (05)/W/3/Rev2, The World Trade Organization