Investigation of response of systems with active multiple tuned mass dampers

Structural Control and Health Monitoring

Volumn 14, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1138-1154

  Li, Chunxiang ^a   Zhu, Bilei ^a  

^a SHANGHAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Control methods; Damping; Displacement; Dynamic magnification factor (DMF); Ground motion; Near zero optimum average damping ratio; Open closed loop active multiple tuned mass dampers (OCL AMTMD); Robustness; Seismic design; Vibration

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; CLOSED LOOP SYSTEMS; FEEDBACK CONTROL; NATURAL FREQUENCIES; OPTIMIZATION; SEISMIC RESPONSE; TUNING;

ACTIVE MULTIPLE TUNED MASS DAMPERS (AMTMD); MULTIPLE TUNED MASS DAMPERS (MTMD); TUNING FREQUENCY RATIO;

DAMPING;

EID: 37249042109     PISSN: 15452255     EISSN: 15452263     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/stc.201     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Xu K, Igusa T. Dynamic characteristics of multiple substructures with closely spaced frequencies. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1992; 21 (12):1059-1070.
2. Yamaguchi H. Harnpornchai N. Fundamental characteristics of multiple tuned mass dampers for suppressing harmonically forced oscillations. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1993; 22(1):51-62.
3. Abe M, Fujino Y. Dynamic characterization of multiple tuned mass dampers and some design formulas. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1994; 23(8):813-835.
4. Abe M, Igusa T. Tuned mass dampers for structures with closely spaced natural frequencies. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1995; 24(2):247-261.
5. Kareem A, Kline S. Performance of multiple mass dampers under random loading. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1995; 121(2):348-361.
6. Jangid RS. Dynamic characteristics of structures with multiple tuned mass dampers. Structural Engineering and Mechanics 1995; 3(5):497-509.
7. Jangid RS. Optimum multiple tuned mass dampers for base excited undamped system. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1999;28(9):1041-1049.
8. Kamiya K, Kamagata K, Seto K. Optimum design method for multi-dynamic vibration absorber. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Motion and Vibration Control, Chiba, Japan, vol. 2, 1996;322-327.
9. Li C. Performance of multiple tuned mass dampers for attenuating undesirable oscillations of structures under the ground acceleration. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2000;29(9):1405- 1421.
10. Yau JD, Yang YB. A wideband MTMD system for reducing the dynamic response of continuous truss bridges to moving train loads. Engineering Structures 2004; 26(12):1795-1807.
11. Yau JD, Yang YB. Vibration reduction for cable-stayed bridges traveled by high-speed trains. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 2004; 40(3):341-359.
12. Lin CC, Wang JF, Chen BL. Train-induced vibration control of high-speed railway bridges equipped with multiple tuned mass dampers. Journal of Bridge Engineering (ASCE) 2005; 10(4):398-414.
13. Chang JCH, Soong TT. Structural control using active tuned mass damper. Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division (ASCE) 1980; 106(6):1091-1098.
14. Chang CC, Yang HTY. Control of buildings using active tuned mass dampers. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 1995; 121(3):355-366.
15. Ankireddi S, Yang HTY. Simple ATMD control methodology for tall buildings subject to wind loads. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1996; 122(1):83-91.
16. Yan N, Wang CM, Balendra T. Optimal damper characteristics of ATMD for buildings under wind loads. Journal oj Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1999; 125( 12):1376-1383.
17. Li C, Liu Y, Wang Z. Active multiple tuned mass dampers: a new control strategy. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2003; 129(7):972-977.
18. Li C, Liu Y. Further characteristics for multiple tuned mass dampers. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2002; 128(10):1362-1365.