The greenhouse gas and energy impacts of using wood instead of alternatives in residential construction in the United States

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-10

  Upton, Brad ^a   Miner, Reid ^b   Spinney, Mike ^c   Heath, Linda S ^d  

^a NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR AIR AND STREAM IMPROVEMENT   (United States)

^b Stream Improvement Inc   (United States)

^c National Council for Air   (United States)

^d US Dept of Agric Forest Service   (United States)

Author keywords

Building materials; Carbon; Concrete; CORRIM; Forestry; GHG; Greenhouse gases; LCA; Lifecycle; Residential construction; Steel; Wood products

Indexed keywords

BUILDING MATERIALS; CARBON; FORESTRY; GREENHOUSE GASES; LIFE CYCLE;

GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS; RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION;

WOOD PRODUCTS;

BUILDING MATERIALS; CARBON; FORESTRY; GREENHOUSE GASES; LIFE CYCLE; WOOD PRODUCTS;

CARBON; CONCRETE; CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL; EMISSION; ENERGY; FORESTRY; FOSSIL FUEL; GREENHOUSE GAS; LIFE CYCLE; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; WOOD;

CARBON; FORESTRY; GREENHOUSE GASES; LIFE CYCLE; WOOD PRODUCTS;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 37249041885     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Energy Information Administration. Residential energy consumption survey-2001 consumption and expenditures data tables (2001), United States Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC
2. Energy Information Administration. Emissions of greenhouse gases in the United States-2001. Report DOE/EIA-0573(2001). Washington, DC: United States Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration; 2002.
3. Energy Information Administration. Energy consumption, expenditures, and emissions indicators, 1949-2004 (2006), United States Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC
4. Lippke B., Wilson J., Perez-Garcia J., Bowyer J., and Meil J. CORRIM: life-cycle environmental performance of renewable building materials. Forest Products Journal 54 6 (2004) 8-19
5. Peirquet P., Bowyer J., and Huelman P. Thermal performance and embodied energy of cold climate wall systems. Forest Products Journal 48 6 (1998) 53-60
6. Marceau M., and Van Geem M. Life cycle assessment of an insulating concrete form house compared to a wood frame house. SN2571 (2002), Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL
7. Marceau M., and Van Geem M. Life cycle assessment of a concrete masonry house compared to a wood frame house. SN2465 (2002), Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL
8. Marceau M., and Van Geem M. Life cycle assessment of a lightweight concrete masonry house compared to a wood frame house. SN2573 (2002), Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL
9. Borjesson P., and Gustavsson L. Greenhouse gas balanced in building construction: wood versus concrete from life-cycle and forest land-use perspectives. Energy Policy 28 (2000) 575-588
10. Athena Sustainable Materials Institute. Comparative environmental impact assessment. In: Energy and the environment in residential construction. Sustainable Building Series, no. 1, Canadian Wood Council, 2004.
11. Scharai-Rad M, Welling J. Environmental and energy balances of wood products and substitutes. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2002.
12. Lenzen M., and Treloar G. Rejoinder to: Greenhouse gas balanced in building construction: wood versus concrete from life-cycle and forest land-use perspectives. Energy Policy 30 (2002) 249-255
13. Gustavsson L., and Sathre R. Variability in energy and carbon dioxide balances of wood and concrete building materials. Building and Environment 41 (2006) 940-951
14. Richter K., and Sell J. Life-cycle analysis: a useful approach to promote wood as a construction material. Wood Focus Design Summer (1993) 14-17
15. Gustavsson L, Pingoud K, Sathre R. Carbon dioxide balance of wood substitution: comparing concrete- and wood-framed buildings. Mitigation and Adaptation strategies for global change, vol. 11, no 3. Netherlands: Springer; 2006.
16. Perez-Garcia J., Lippke B., Briggs D., Wilson J., Bowyer J., and Meil J. The environmental performance of renewable building materials in the context of residential construction. Wood and Fiber Science (2005)
17. Puettmann M., and Wilson J. Life-cycle analysis of wood products; cradle-to-gate LCI of residential wood building materials. Wood and Fiber Science CORRIM Special Issue 37 (2005) 18-29
18. Sarri A. Environmental specifications of building parts and buildings [in Finnish]. TKK Rakentamistalous [Helsinki University of Technology, Construction Economics and Management]. Sponsored by Rakennustieto Oy [Building Information Ltd.]. Helsinki: Rakennustietosaatio RTS [Building Information Foundation RTS]; 2001 [CORRIM Special Issue].
19. Gajda J. Energy use of single-family houses with various exterior walls. PCA CD026 (2001), Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL
20. Australian Greenhouse Office. Australian residential building sector greenhouse gas emissions 1990-2010: final report (1999), Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, ACT
21. Milne G, Reardon C. Embodied energy. 3.1. In: Shackel S, Downton P, Waters S, Corcoran P, editors. Technical manual: design for lifestyle and the future. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia, Australian Greenhouse Office; 2004.
22. Kossecka E., Kosny J., Desjarlais A., and Christian J. Dynamic thermal performance and energy benefits of using massive walls in residential buildings (2001), Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN
23. Steel Construction Institute. A comparative environmental life cycle assessment of modern office buildings (1998), The Steel Construction Institute, Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire, UK
24. Adalberth K., Almgren A., and Holleris Petersen E. Life cycle assessment of four multi-family buildings. International Journal of Low Energy and Sustainable Buildings 2 (2001)
25. Anderson J. Development of an environmental research strategy in Sweden. In: Proceedings of the 2nd world conference on steel in construction, San Sebastian, Spain, May 11-13, 1998. Report 210:2. Swedish Institute of Steel Construction; 1998.
26. Steel Construction Sector Sustainability Committee. Sustainable steel construction: building for a better future-a sustainability strategy for the UK steel construction sector. Ascot, Berkshire, UK: The Steel Construction Institute; 2002.
27. de Spot M. The application of structural steel to single-family residential construction (1999), Node Engineering Corporation, Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation, Ottawa, Ont.
28. Pingoud K, Perala A. Studies on greenhouse impacts of wood construction. 1. Scenario analysis of potential wood utilization in Finnish new construction in 1990 and 1994. 2. Inventory of carbon stock of wood products in the Finnish building stock in 1980, 1990, and 1995. VTT Report 840. Espoo: Technical Research Center of Finland; 2000 [in Finnish, abstract in English].
29. Buchanan A.H., and Levine S.B. Wood-based building materials and atmospheric carbon emissions. Environmental Science and Policy 2 (1999) 427-437
30. Eriksson P. Comparative LCAs for wood construction and other construction methods-energy use and GHG emissions (2003), Swedish Wood Association (now part of Swedish Forest Industries Federation), Stockholm
31. Perez-Garcia J., Lippke B., Comnick J., and Manriquez C. An assessment of carbon pools, storage, and wood products market substitution using life-cycle analysis results. Wood and Fiber Science CORRIM Special Issue 37 (2005) 140-148
32. Bowyer J., Briggs D., Johnson L., Kasal B., Lippke B., Meil J., et al. CORRIM: a report of progress and a glimpse of the future. Forest Products Journal 51 10 (2001) 10-22
33. Bowyer J., Briggs D., Lippke B., Perez-Garcia J., Wilson J., Johnson L., et al. Life cycle environmental performance of renewable building materials in the context of residential building construction: phase I interim research report (2002), CORRIM Inc., Seattle
34. Smith JE, Woodbury PB, Heath LS. Forest carbon sequestration and products storage, and Appendix C-1. In: US Agriculture and Forestry Greenhouse Gas Inventory: 1990-2001. Technical Bulletin 197. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture; 2004. p. 80-93, C-1.
35. Murray BC, McCarl BA, Lee H-C. Estimating leakage from forest carbon sequestration programs. International working paper 02_06. Research Triangle Institute (RTI) International; 2002.
36. Murray B.C., McCarl B.A., and Lee H.-C. Estimating leakage from forest carbon sequestration programs. Land Economics 80 1 (2004) 109-124
37. Proctor P, Heath LS, Van Deusen P, Gove JH, Smith JE. COLE: a web-based tool for interfacing with forest inventory data. In: McRoberts RE, et al., editors. Proceedings of FIA symposium. North Central GTR NC-252. St. Paul, MN; US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station; 2005, p. 167-72.
38. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Inventory of US greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990-2003. EPA430-R-05-003. US Environmental Protection Agency, 2005.
39. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Good practice guidance for land use, land use change and forestry: chapter 3, App 3a.1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Program, 2003.
40. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Solid waste management and greenhouse gases-a life cycle assessment of emissions and sinks, 2nd ed. EPA530-R-02-006. US Environmental Protection Agency, 2002.
41. National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc. Critical review of forest products decomposition in municipal solid waste landfills. Technical bulletin no. 872. Research Triangle Park, NC: National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc.; 2004.
42. Skog K., and Nicholson G. Carbon cycling through wood products: the role of wood and paper products in carbon sequestration. Forest Products Journal 48 7/8 (1998) 75-83
43. United States Census Bureau. New privately owned housing units started (2006), US Department of Commerce, Washington, DC
44. Garth J, Easton I, Edelson J. Material substitution trends in residential construction: 1995, 1998 and 2001. Working paper 93. Seattle: University of Washington Center for International Trade in Forest Products (CINTRAFOR); 2004.
45. McKeever D. How woody residuals are recycled in the United States. Biocycle December (1999) 33-44
46. McKeever D. Taking inventory of woody residuals. Biocycle July (2003) 31-35
47. Petersen A.K., and Solberg B. Environmental and economic impacts of substitution between wood products and alternative materials: a review of micro-level analyses from Norway and Sweden. Forest Policy and Economics 7 (2005) 24-259