QSAR modeling using automatically updating correction libraries: Application to a human plasma protein binding model

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 2401-2407

  Rodgers, Sarah L ^a   Davis, Andrew M ^a   Tomkinson, Nick P ^a   Van De Waterbeemd, Han ^a  

^a ASTRAZENECA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINDING SITES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASE SYSTEMS; PLASMA (HUMAN); PROTEINS;

CORRECTION LIBRARY; PROTEIN BINDINGS;

MOLECULAR DYNAMICS;

PLASMA PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; METABOLISM; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DATABASE; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

BLOOD PROTEINS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROTEIN BINDING; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 37249039935     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci700197x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Stouch, T. R.; Kenyon, J. R.; Johnson, S. R.; Chen, X.-Q.; Doweyko, A.; Li, Y. In silico ADME/Tox: why models fail. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2003, 17, 83-92.
2. Tetko, I. V.; Bruneau, P.; Mewes, H.-W.; Rohrer, D. C.; Poda, G. I. Can we estimate the accuracy of ADME-Tox predictions? Drug Discovery Today 2006, 11, 700-707.
3. Rodgers, S. L.; Davis, A. M.; Van de Waterbeemd, H. Time-Series QSAR Analysis of Human Plasma Protein Binding Data. QSAR Comb. Sci. 2007, 26, 511-521.
4. Cartmell, J.; Enoch, S.; Krstajic, D.; Leahy, D. E. Automated QSPR through Competitive Workflow. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2005, 19, 821-833.
5. Guha, R.; Dutta, D.; Jurs, P. C.; Chen, T. Local Lazy Regression: Making Use of the Neighbourhood to Improve QSAR Predictions. J. Chem. Inf. Model 2006, 46, 1836-1847.
6. Zhang, S.; Golbraikh, A.; Oloff, S.; Kohn, H.; Tropsha, A. A Novel Automated Lazy Learning QSAR (ALL-QSAR) Approach: Method Development, Applications, and Virtual Screening of Chemical Databases Using Validated ALL-QSAR Models. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46, 1984-1995.
7. Gola, J.; Obrezanova, O.; Champness, E.; Segall, M. ADMET Property Prediction: The State of the Art and Current Challenges. QSAR Comb. Sci. 2006, 25, 1172-1180.
8. Tetko, I. Neural Network Studies. 4. Introduction to Associative Neural Networks. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2002, 42, 717-728.
9. Tetko, I. Application of Associative Neural Networks for Prediction of Lipophilicity in ALOGPS 2.1 Program. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2002, 42, 1136-1145.
10. Johnson, M. A.; Maggiora, G. M. In Concepts and Applications of Molecular Similarity; Wiley: New York, 1990.
11. Patterson, D. E.; Cramer, R. D.; Ferguson, A. M.; Clark, R. D.; Weinbuerger, L. E. Neighbourhood Behaviour: A Useful Concept for Validation of "Molecular Diversity" Descriptors. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 3049-3059.
12. Tetko, I. V.; Bruneau, P. Application of ALOGPS to Predict 1-Octanol/Water Distribution Coefficients, logP, and logD, of AstraZeneca InHouse Database. J. Pharm. Sci. 2004, 93, 3103-3110.
13. Tetko, I. V.; Tanchuk, V. Y. Application of Associative Neural Networks for Prediction of Lipophilicity in ALOGPS 2.1 Program. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2002, 42, 1136-1145.
14. Van de Waterbeemd, H.; Gifford, E. ADMET in silico modelling: Towards Prediction Paradise? Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2003, 2, 192-204.
15. Fessey, R. E.; Austin, R. P.; Barton, P.; Davis, A. M.; Wenlock, M. C. The Role of Plasma Protein Binding in Drug Discovery. In Pharmacokinetic Profiling in Drug Research, 1st ed.; Testa, B., Krämer, S. D., Wunderlie-Allenspach, H., Folkers G., Eds.; Verlag Helvetica Chimica Acta: Zurich, Switzerland, 2006; pp 119-141.
16. 7.4 Modelling Using Bayesian Regularized Neural Networks. Assessment and Correction of the Errors of Prediction. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46, 1379-1387.
17. SIMCA-P, v10.0.4.0; Umetrics: Umeå, Sweden 2003. Available from http://www.umetrics.com.