Empirically assessing effects of the right frontier constraint

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4410 LNAI, Issue , 2007, Pages 15-27

  Holler, Anke ^a   Irmen, Lisa ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b Department for Psychology Institute of Psychology   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSTRAINT THEORY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; TEXT PROCESSING;

GENDER ANTECEDENTS; SITUATIONAL MODELS;

COMPUTATIONAL GRAMMARS;

EID: 37249039471     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-71412-5_2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Anderson, A., Garrod, S. C., Sanford, A. J. (1983) The accessibility of pronominal antecedents as a function of episode shifts in narrative text. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 35A: 427-440.
2. Ariel, M. (2001) Accessibility theory: An overview. In: Sanders, T, Schilperoord, J., Spooren, W. (eds.) Text representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects. John Benjamins, Amsterdam: 29-87.
3. Asher, N. (1993) Reference to abstract objects in discourse. Kluwer, Dordrecht. Asher, N. (2004) Discourse topic. Theoretical Linguistics 30: 163-201.
4. Asher, N., Lascarides, A. (2003) Logics of discourse. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
5. Asher, N., Vieu., L. (2005) Subordinating and coordinating discourse relations. Lingua 115: 591-610.
6. Chambers, C. G., Smyth, R. (1998) Structural parallelism and discourse coherence: A test of centering theory. Journal of Memory and Language 39: 593-608.
7. Garnham, A. (2001) Mental models and the interpretation of anaphora. Psychology Press Ltd., Sussex.
8. Gordon, P., Grosz, B., Gilliom, G. (1993) Pronouns, names, and the centering of attention in discourse. Cognitive Science 3 (17): 311-347.
9. Grosz, B., Sidner, C. (1986) Attentions, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics 12 (3): 175-204.
10. Grosz, B., Joshi, A., Weinstein, S. (1995) Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics 21 (2): 203-226.
11. Hudson-d'Zmura, S., Tanenhaus, M. (1998) Assigning antecedents to ambiguous pronouns. The role of the center of attention as the default assignment. In: M. Walker, Joshi, A., Prince, E. (eds.) Centering Theory in discourse. Clarendon Press, Oxford: 199-226.
12. Klin, C. M., Guzmán, A. E., Weingartner, K. M., Ralano, A. S. (2006) When anaphor resolution fails: Partial encoding of anaphoric inferences. Journal of Memory and Language 54: 131-143.
13. Mann, W., Thompson, S. A. (1988) Rhetorical structure theory toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 8(3): 243-281.
14. Matthiessen, C., Thompson, S. A. (1987) The structure of discourse and subordination.. In: Thompson, S. A., Haiman, J. (eds.) Clause combining in discourse and grammar. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
15. Morrow, D. G., Greenspan, S. L., Bower, G.H. (1987) Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 26: 165-187.
16. Polanyi, L. (1988) A formal model of the structure of discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 12: 601-638.
17. Polanyi, L. (1996) The linguistic structure of discourse. Technical Report CSLI-96-200. CSLI, Stanford University.
18. Prince, E. F. (1992) The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness, and information status. In: Mann, W. C., Thompson, S. A. (eds.) Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fundraising text. John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: 295-326.
19. Sanders, T., Spooren, W., Noordman, L. (1992) Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse Processes 15: 1-35.
20. Webber, B. L. (1988) Discourse deixis and discourse processing. Technical report MS-CIS-86-74.
21. Line Lab 42. Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania.