Bureacratizing ethics: Institutional review boards and participatory research

ACME

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 319-328

  Martin, Deborah G ^a  

^a CLARK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 37249019094     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14929732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Alexander, Julia. 2001. Remarks in formal program presentation, "Introduction to Human Subjects Research - Policies and Procedures". NIH-Sanctioned Institutional Review Board Program completed by Author, University of Georgia. Athens, Georgia, 17 April.
2. Association of American Geographers (AAG). 2005. Statement on Professional Ethics. Endorsed by the Council of the AAG, 18 October 1998. Updated 5 April 2005. Available online at http://www.aag.org/Publications/Other%2OPubs/ Statement%20on%20Professiona1%20Ethics.pdf. Last accessed 5 March 5, 2007.
3. Belmont Report. 1979. See National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research.
4. Cohen, Patricia. 2007. As ethics panels expand grip, no field is off linuits. The New York Times 28 February. Accessed online at http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/28/arts/28board.html, 28 February 2007.
5. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). 2005. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45 Public Welfare Part 46, Protection of Human Subjects. Revised June 23, 2005. Available online at http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm. Last accessed 6 March 2007.
6. Gunsalus, C. Kristina. 2004. The nanny state meets the inner lawyer: overregulating while underprotecting human participants in research. Ethics and Behavior 14, 369-382. Available online as Law and Economics Working Papers, University of Illinois College of Law, Berkeley Electronic Press: http://Iaw.bepress.com/uiuclwps/pgpers/ art42. Last accessed 5 March 2007.
7. Haney, Craig, Curtis Banks, and Philip G. Zimbardo. 1973. Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison. International Journal of Criminology and Penology 1, 69-97.
8. Hay, Iain. 1998. Making moral imaginations: research ethics, pedagogy, and professional human geography. Ethics, Place and Environment 1, 55-75.
9. Israel, Mark, and Iain Hay. 2006. Research Ethics for Social Scientists: Between Ethical Conduct and Regulatory Compliance. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
10. Kindon, Sara. 2005. Participatory action research. In, Iain Hay (ed.), Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography, 2nd Ed. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 207-20.
11. King, Martin Luther, Jr. 1986[1958]. Stride Toward Freedom: The Montgomery Story. San Francisco and New York: Harper and Row.
12. Kitchin, Rob, and Phil Hubbard. 1999. Research, action and 'critical' geographies. Area 31, 195-198
13. Mitscherlich, Alexander, and Fred Mielke. 1949. Doctors of Infamy: The Story of the Nazi Medical Crimes. Trans. By Heinz Norden. New York: Henry Schuman.
14. Mueller, John. Why is compliance more important than effectiveness? Presentation at the National Workshop on Human Subjects: Issues in Social and Behavioral Research. Session on The Future of Social and Behavioral Research: Learning from the Past. Athens, Georgia, 29 July.
15. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. 1979. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Department of Health, Education and Welfare (now Department of Health and Human Services), U.S. Government. Available online at http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.htm. Last accessed 30 January 2007.
16. Nuremberg Code. 1947. See United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (USHMM).
17. Schutt, Russell K. 2004. Investigating the Social World: The Process and Practice of Research, 4th Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press/Sage Publications.
18. Singleton, Royce A., and Bruce C. Straits. 2005. Approaches to Social Research, 4th Ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
19. United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (USHMM). 2007a. The Nuremberg Code (from Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10. Nuremberg, October 1946-April 1949. Washington, D.C.: U.S. G.P.O, 1949-1953.) Excerpts available online at http://www.ushmm.org/research/doctors/ Nuremberg_Code.htm. Last accessed 5 February 2007.
20. United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (USHMM). 2007b. The Nuremberg Code Explanation (USHMM note). Available online at http://www.ushmm.org/research/doctors/code expl.htm. Last accessed 5 February 2007.
21. Zimbardo, Philip G. 1973. On the ethics of intervention in human psychological research: with special reference to the Stanford prison study. Cognition 2, 243-56.