Crime prevention through environmental design: Financial hardship, the dynamics of power, and the prospects of governance

Crime, Law and Social Change

Volumn 48, Issue 3-5, 2007, Pages 73-85

  Parnaby, Patrick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 37249017552     PISSN: 09254994     EISSN: 15730751     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10611-007-9077-1     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Atlas, R. (1991). The other side of CPTED. Security Management, 35(3), 63-67.
2. Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
3. Blakely, E. J., & Snyder, M. G. (1999). Fortress America gated communities in the United States. Washington, D.C: Brookings Institution Press.
4. Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1993). Nodes, paths and edges: Considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 3-28.
5. Brantingham, P. L., Brantingham, P. L., & Taylor, W. (2005). Situational crime prevention as a key component in embedded crime prevention. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 47(2), 271.
6. Brantingham, P. J., & Jeffery, C. R. (1981). Afterward: Crime, space, and criminological theory. In P. J. Brantingham, & P. L. Brantingham (Eds.) Environmental criminology (pp. 227-237). California: Sage Publications.
7. Brower, S., Dockett, K., & Taylor, R. B. (1983). Residents' perceptions of territorial features and perceived local threat. Environment and Behavior, 15(4), 419-437.
8. Casteel, C., & Peek-Asa, C. (2000). Effectiveness of crime prevention through environmental design in reducing robberies. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 18(4S), 99-115.
9. Clarke, R. V. G. (1992). Situational crime prevention: Successful case studies. New York: Harrow and Heston Publishers.
10. Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-608.
11. Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (1987). Understanding crime displacement: An application of rational choice theory. Criminology, 25(4), 933-947.
12. Cozens, P., Hillier, D., & Prescott, G. (2001a). Crime and the design of residential property - Exploring the perceptions of planning professionals, burglars and other users. Property Management, 19(4), 222-248.
13. Cozens, P., Hillier, D., & Prescott, G. (2001). Crime and the design of residential property - Exploring the theoretical background (part 1). Property Management, 19(2), 136-164.
14. Cozens, P., Neale, J. W., & Hillier, D. (2003). Managing crime and the fear of crime at railway stations: A case study in south Wales. International Journal of Transportation Management, 1, 121-132.
15. Crowe, T. D. (2000). Crime prevention through environmental design applications of architectural design and space management concepts. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
16. Davis, M. (1992). City of Quartz: Excavating the future in Los Angeles. New York: Vintage Books.
17. Dreyfus, H. L., & Rabinow, P. (1982). Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. Foucault, M. (1988). Madness and Civilization: A history of insanity in the age of reason. New York: Vintage Books.
19. Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.) Governmentality: The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87-104). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Foucault, M., & Gordon, C. (1980). Power-knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. Hassocks: Harvester Press.
21. Garland, D. (1997). Governmentality and the problem of crime: Foucault, criminology, sociology. Theoretical Criminology, 1(2), 173-214.
22. Garland, D. (2000). The culture of high crime societies. British Journal of Criminology, 40, 347-375.
23. Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co.
25. Ham-Rowbottom, K. A., Gifford, R., & Shaw, K. T. (1999). Defensible space theory and the police: Assessing the vulnerability of residences to burglary. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 117-129.
26. Jacobs, J. (1992). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Vintage Books.
27. Jeffery, C. R. (1977). Crime prevention through environmental design. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications Inc.
28. Johnston, L., & Shearing, C. (2003). Governing security: Explorations in policing and justice. New York: Routledge.
29. Karmen, A. (1996). Crime victims. Scarborough: Nelson Canada.
30. Lemke, T. (2002). Foucault, governmentality, and critique. Rethinking Marxism, 14(3), 49-64.
31. McDonald, J. E., & Gifford, R. (1989). Territorial cues and defensible space theory: The burglar's point of view. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9, 193-205.
32. Merry, S. E. (1981). Defensible space undefended: Social factors in crime control through environmental design. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 16(4), 397-422.
33. Minnery, J. R., & Lim, B. (2005). Measuring crime prevention through environmental design. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 22(4), 330-331.
34. Newman, O. (1972). Defensible space. New York: The Macmillan Company.
35. Newman, O. (1996). Creating defensible space. Washington: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
36. O'Malley, P. (1992). Risk, power and crime prevention. Economy and Society, 21(3), 252-275.
37. O'Malley, P. (1996). Risk and responsibility. In A. Barry, T. Osborne, & N. Rose (Eds.) Risk and Responsibility: Foucault and political reason (pp. 189-207). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38. O'Malley, P., & Palmer, D. (1996). Post-Keynesian policing. Economy and Society, 25, 137-155.
39. O'Malley, P., Weir, L., & Shearing, C. (1997). Governmentality, criticism, politics. Economy and Society, 26(4), 501-517.
40. Parnaby, P. F. (2006). Crime prevention through environmental design: Discourses of risk, social control, and a neo-liberal context. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 48(1), 1-29.
41. Poyner, B. (1983). Design against crime. Toronto: Butterworths.
42. Rentschler, C. A. (2000). Designing fear: Environmental security and violence against women. Cultural Studies: A Research Annual, 5, 281-307.
43. Rose, N. (1993). Government, authority and expertise in advanced liberalism. Economy and Society, 22(3), 283-299.
44. Rose, N. (2000). Government and control. British Journal of Criminology, 40(2), 321-339.
45. Rose, N., & Miller, P. (1992). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 173-205.
46. Sarangi, S., & Candlin, C. N. (2003). Categorization and explanation of risk: A discourse analytical perspective. Health, Risk & Society, 5(2), 115-124.
47. Schneider, R. H., & Kitchen, T. (2002). Planning for crime prevention: A transatlantic perspective. New York: Routledge.
48. SchneiderPearcey, S.P. (1996). The theory and practice of crime prevention through environmental design: A literature review. Vancouver: Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation.
49. Weber, R. P. (1985). Basic content analysis. California: Sage Publications.
50. Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. L. (1982). Broken windows. The Atlantic Monthly, 249(3), 29-38.