A novel framework integrating downhole array data and site response analysis to extract dynamic soil behavior

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 181-197

  Tsai, Chi Chin ^a   Hashash, Youssef M A ^a  

^a United States of America   (United States)

Author keywords

Downhole array; Inverse analysis; Site response analysis; Soil behavior

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CONSTITUTIVE MODELS; NEURAL NETWORKS; SEISMIC PROSPECTING; SEISMIC RESPONSE;

DOWNHOLE ARRAY; INVERSE ANALYSIS; SITE RESPONSE ANALYSIS; SOIL BEHAVIOR;

SOIL MECHANICS;

ALGORITHM; ARRAY; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; CONSTITUTIVE EQUATION; INVERSE ANALYSIS; MODELING; RESPONSE ANALYSIS; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SITE EFFECT; SOIL DYNAMICS; SOIL PROFILE;

EID: 37249001868     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.06.008     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Idriss I.M., and Seed H.B. An analysis of ground motions during the 1957 San Francisco earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58 (1968) 2013-2032
2. Seed RB, Dickenson SE, Riemer MF, Bray JD, Sitar N, Mitchell JK, et al. Preliminary report on the principal geotechnical aspects of the October 17, 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake. UCB/EERC-89/03, 1990.
3. Fletcher J.B., and Wen K.-L. Strong ground motion in the Taipei basin from the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95 (2005) 1428-1446
4. Stone W.C., Yokel F.Y., Celebi M., Hanks T.C.C., and Leyendecker E.V. Engineering aspects of the September 19, 1985 Mexico earthquake. NBS building science series vol. 165 (1987), US Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC
5. Seed H.B., Romo M.P., Sun J.I., Jaime A., and Lysmer J. The Mexico earthquake of September 19, 1985-relationships between soil conditions and earthquake ground motions. Earthquake Spectra 4 (1988) 687-729
6. Kramer S.L. Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice-Hall international series in civil engineering and engineering mechanics (1996), Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ 653pp
7. Zeghal M., Elgamal A.-W., Tang H.T., and Stepp J.C. Lotung downhole array II: evaluation of soil nonlinear properties. J Geotech Eng 124 (1995) 363-377
8. Glaser S.D., and Baise L.G. System identification estimation of soil properties at the Lotung site. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 19 (2000) 521-531
9. Elgamal A, Lai T, Yang Z, He L. Dynamic soil properties, seismic downhole arrays and applications in practice. In: The fourth international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics, San Diego, CA, USA, 2001.
10. Harichance Z., Afra H., and Elachachi S.M. An identification procedure of soil profile characteristics from two free field accelerometer records. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 25 (2005) 431-438
11. Ghaboussi J., Pecknold D.A., Zhang M., and Haj-Ali R. Autoprogressive training of neural network constitutive models. Int J Numer Methods Eng 42 (1998) 105-126
12. Sidarta D., and Ghaboussi J. Modelling constitutive behavior of materials from non-uniform material tests. Comput Geotech 22 (1998) 53-71
13. Shin H.S., and Pande G.N. On self-learning finite element codes based on monitored response of structures. Comput Geotech 27 (2000) 161-178
14. Pande GN, Shin HS. Finite elements with artificial intelligence. In: The eighth international symposium on numerical models in geomechanics-NUMOG VIII, Italy, 2002. p. 241-6.
15. Hashash Y.M.A., Marulanda C., Ghaboussi J., and Jung S. Systematic update of a deep excavation model using field performance data. Comput Geotech 30 (2003) 477-488
16. Hashash YMA, Park D. Site response analysis in the Mississippi embayment. In: US-JAPAN seminar on seismic disaster mitigation in urban area by geotechnical engineering, Anchorage, AK, 2002. 19pp.
17. Hashash Y.M.A., and Park D. Non-linear one-dimensional seismic ground motion propagation in the Mississippi embayment. Eng Geol 62 (2001) 185-206
18. Chopra A.K. Dynamics of structures: theory and applications to earthquake engineering. Prentice-Hall international series in civil engineering and engineering mechanics (1995), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
19. Ghaboussi J., Garret J.H., and Wu X. Knowledge-based modeling of material behaviour with neural networks. J Eng Mech Div 117 (1991) 132-153
20. Chou JH, Ghaboussi J. Structural damage detection and identification using genetic algorithm. In: International conference on artificial neural networks in engineering, vol. 7, St. Louis, MO, 1997. p. 395-400.
21. Ellis G.W., Yao C., Zhao R., and Penumadu D. Stress-strain modeling of sands using artificial neural network. J Geotech Eng (1995) 429-435
22. Zhu J.-H., Zaman M.M., and Anderson S.A. Modeling of soil behavior with a recurrent neural network. Can Geotech J 35 (1998) 858-869
23. Penumadu D., and Zhao R. Triaxial compression behavior of sand and gravel using artificial neural networks (ANN). Comput Geotech 24 (1999) 207-230
24. Basheer I.A. Selection of methodology for neural network modeling of constitutive hystereses behavior of soils. Comput-Aided Civ Infrastructure Eng 15 (2000) 440-458
25. Wu X, Ghaboussi J. Modelling the cyclic behavior of the concrete using adaptive neural networks. In: Asian Pacific conference on computational mechanics, 1993.
26. Yamamoto K. Modeling of hysteretic behavior with neural network and its application to non-linear dynamic response. In: Proceedings of the international conference on applications of artificial intelligence in engineering, 1992.
27. Yun GJ. Modeling of hysteretic behavior of beam-column connections based on self learning simulation. PhD thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, 2006. 236pp.
28. Park D., and Hashash Y.M.A. Estimation of seismic factors in the Mississippi Embayment: I. Estimation of dynamic properties. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 25 (2005) 133-144