Adaptive solution techniques for simulating underwater explosions and implosions

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 227, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 2083-2104

  Kadioglu, Samet Y ^a   Sussman, Mark ^b  

^a IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

AMR; CLSVOF; Multi phase; Semi implicit; Under water explosions and implosions

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; EULER EQUATIONS; TWO PHASE FLOW; UNDERWATER EXPLOSIONS;

ADAPTIVE SOLUTION; AMR; COUPLED LEVEL SET AND VOLUME-OF-FLUID METHOD; IMPLICIT ALGORITHM; LEVEL SET; MULTI-PHASE; SEMI-IMPLICIT; SOLUTION TECHNIQUES; UNDER-WATER EXPLOSION AND IMPLOSION; VOLUME-OF-FLUID METHOD;

NUMERICAL METHODS;

EID: 37248999292     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: 10902716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2007.10.019     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Almgren A.S., Bell J.B., Colella P., Howell L.H., and Welcome M.L. A conservative adaptive projection method for the variable density incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. J. Comput. Phys. 142 (1998) 1-46
2. A.S. Almgren, J.B. Bell, L.H. Howell, P. Colella, An adaptive projection method for incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, in: Proceedings of the IMACS 14th World Conference, Atlanta, GA, July 1994.
3. Bell J.B., Berger M.J., Saltzman J.S., and Welcome M. Three dimensional adaptive mesh refinement for hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Comput. 15 (1994) 127-138
4. Berger M.J., and Colella P. Local adaptive mesh refinement for shock hydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 82 (1989) 64-84
5. Berger M.J., and Oliger J. Adaptive mesh refinement for hyperbolic partial differential equations. J. Comput. Phys. 53 (1984) 484-512
6. M.J. Berger, I. Rigoustsos, An algorithm for point clustering and grid generation, Technical Report NYU-501, New York University-CIMS, 1991.
7. Caiden R., Fedkiw R., and Anderson C. A numerical method for two phase flow consisting of separate compressible and incompressible regions. J. Comput. Phys. 166 (2001) 1-27
8. Clark T.L., and Farley R.D. Severe downslope windstorm calculations in two and three spatial dimensions using anelastic interactive grid nesting: a possible mechanism for gustiness. J. Atmos. Sci. 41 (1984) 329-350
9. Colella P., and Pao K. A projection method for low speed flows. J. Comput. Phys. 149 2 (1999) 245-269
10. Fedkiw R., Aslam T., Merriman B., and Osher S. A non-oscillatory Eulerian approach to interfaces in multi-material flows (the Ghost Fluid Method). J. Comput. Phys. 152 (1999) 457
11. Howell L.H., and Bell J.B. An adaptive-mesh projection method for viscous incompressible flow. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 18 (1997) 996-1013
12. Kadioglu S.Y., Sussman M., Osher S., Wright J.P., and Kang M. A second order primitive preconditioner for solving all speed multi-phase flows. J. Comput. Phys. 209 2 (2005) 477-503
13. Minion M.L. A projection method for locally refined grids. J. Comput. Phys. 127 (1996) 158-178
14. Nourgaliev R.R., Dinh T.N., Theofanous T.G., and Koning J.M. Direct Numerical Simulation of Disperse Multiphase High-speed Flows (2004), AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting
15. Pember R.B., Howell L.H., Bell J.B., Colella P., Crutchfield W.Y., Fiveland W.A., and Jessee J.P. An adaptive projection method for unsteady low-Mach number combustion. Combust. Sci. Tech. 140 (1998) 123-168
16. Rendleman C.A., Beckner V.E., Lijewski M., Crutchfield W.Y., and Bell J.B. Parallelization of structured, hierarchical adaptive mesh refinement algorithms. Comput. Visual. Sci. 3 (2000) 147-157
17. Skamarock W.C., and Klemp J.B. Adaptive grid refinement for two-dimensional and three-dimensional nonhydrostatic atmospheric flow. Monthly Weather Rev. 121 (1993) 788-804
18. E. Steinthorsson, D. Modiano, W.Y. Crutchfield, J.B. Bell, P. Colella, An adaptive semi-implicit scheme for simulations of unsteady viscous compressible flow, in: Proceedings of the 12th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Orlando, FL, June 1995.
19. Stevens D.E., and Bretherton C.S. A forward-in-time advection scheme and adaptive multilevel flow solver for nearly incompressible atmospheric flow. J. Comput. Phys. 129 (1996) 284-295
20. Sussman M. A second order coupled level set and volume-of-fluid method for computing growth and collapse of vapor bubbles. J. Comput. Phys. 187 (2003) 110-136
21. Sussman M., and Puckett E.G. A coupled level set and volume-of-fluid method for computing 3D and axisymmetric incompressible two-phase flows. J. Comput. Phys. 162 (2000) 301-337
22. Sussman M., Smith K., Hussaini M.Y., Ohta M., and Wei R.-Z. A sharp interface method for incompressible two-phase flows. J. Comput. Phys. 221 (2007) 469-505
23. F.K.L. Tan, B.C. Khoo, J. White, A level set-boundary element method for the simulation of underwater bubble dynamics, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., submitted for publication.
24. van der Heul D.R., Vuik C., and Wesseling P. A conservative pressure-correction method for the Euler and ideal MHD equations at all speeds. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluid 40 (2002) 521-529
25. van der Heul D.R., Vuik C., and Wesseling P. A conservative pressure-correction method for flow at all speeds. Comput. Fluid 32 (2003) 1113-1132
26. van Leer B. Toward the ultimate conservative difference scheme ii. monotonicity and conservation combined in a second order scheme. J. Comput. Phys. 14 (1974) 361-370
27. A. Wardlaw, Underwater explosion test cases, Technical Report IHTR 2069, ADB238684, Office of Naval Research, 1998.
28. Wesseling P., and van der Heul D.R. Uniformly effective numerical methods for hyperbolic systems. Computing 66 (2001) 249-267
29. Xiao F. Unified formulation for compressible and incompressible flows by using multi-integral moments I: one-dimensional inviscid compressible flow. J. Comput. Phys. 195 (2004) 629-654
30. Xiao F., Akoh R., and Ii S. Unified formulation for compressible and incompressible flows by using multi-integrated moments II: multi-dimensional version for compressible and incompressible flows. J. Comput. Phys. 213 (2006) 31-56
31. Yabe T., Ogata Y., Takizawa K., Kawai T., Segawa A., and Sakurai K. The next generation CIP as a conservative semi-Lagrangian solver for solid, liquid, and gas. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 149 (2002) 267-277
32. Yabe T., and Wang P.Y. Unified numerical procedure for compressible and incompressible flow. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 60 (1991) 2105-2108
33. Yabe T., Xiao F., and Utsumi T. The constrained interpolation profile method for multiphase analysis. J. Comput. Phys. 169 (2001) 556-593
34. Yoon S.Y., and Yabe T. The unified simulation for incompressible and compressible flow by the predictor-corrector scheme based on the CIP method. Comput. Phys. Commun. 119 (1999) 149-158