Practical reasoning about invocations and implementations of pure methods

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4422 LNCS, Issue , 2007, Pages 336-351

  Darvas, Ádám ^a   Leino, K Rustan M ^b  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CODES (SYMBOLS); COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; FORMAL LOGIC; FUNCTION EVALUATION;

MODULAR VERIFICATION; USER-DEFINED FUNCTIONS;

OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING;

EID: 37149055801     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-71289-3_26     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. M. Barnett, R. DeLine, M. Fähndrich, K. R. M. Leino, and W. Schulte. Verification of object-oriented programs with invariants. JOT, 3(6):27-56, 2004.
2. M. Barnett, R. DeLine, B. Jacobs, B.-Y. E. Chang, and K. R. M. Leino. Boogie: A modular reusable verifier for object-oriented programs. In FMCO, volume 4111 of LNCS, pages 364-387. Springer, 2006.
3. M. Barnett, K. R. M. Leino, and W. Schulte. The Spec# programming system: An overview. In CASSIS, volume 3362 of LNCS, pages 49-69. Springer, 2005.
4. D. G. Clarke, J. M. Potter, and J. Noble. Ownership types for flexible alias protection. In OOPSLA, volume 33(10), pages 48-64. ACM, 1998.
5. D. R. Cok. Reasoning with specifications containing method calls and model fields. JOT, 4(8):77-103, October 2005.
6. Á. Darvas and P. Müller. Reasoning about method calls in interface specifications. JOT, 5(5):59-85, June 2006.
7. D. Detlefs, G. Nelson, and J. B. Saxe. Simplify: A theorem prover for program checking. Tech. Rep. HPL-2003-148, Systems Research Center, HP Labs, 2003.
8. B. Jacobs and F. Piessens. Verification of programs using inspector methods. In Formal Techniques for Java-like Programs, 2006.
9. R. Joshi. Extended static checking of programs with cyclic dependencies. Technical Note 1997-028, Digital Equipment Corporation Systems Research Center, 1997.
10. I. T. Kassios. Dynamic frames: Support for framing, dependencies and sharing without restrictions. In FM, volume 4085 of LNCS, pages 268-283. Springer, 2006.
11. G. T. Leavens, A. L. Baker, and C. Ruby. Preliminary design of JML: A behavioral interface specification language for Java. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 31(3):1-38, 2006.
12. K. R. M. Leino and P. Müller. Object invariants in dynamic contexts. In ECOOP, volume 3086 of LNCS, pages 491-516. Springer, 2004.
13. K. R. M. Leino and P. Müller. A verification methodology for model fields. In ESOP, volume 3924 of LNCS, pages 115-130. Springer, 2006.
14. C. Marché, C. Paulin-Mohring, and X. Urbain. The KRAKATOA tool for certification of JAVA/JAVACARD programs annotated in JML. Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming, 58(1-2):89-106, Jan.-Mar. 2004.
15. B. Meyer. Eiffel: The Language. Prentice Hall, 1992.
16. M. Parkinson and G. Bierman. Separation logic and abstraction. In POPL, pages 247-258. ACM, 2005.
17. A. Poetzsch-Heffter and P. Müller. A programming logic for sequential Java. In ESOP, volume 1576 of LNCS, pages 162-176. Springer, 1999.
18. A. Sǎlcianu and M. C Rinard. Purity and side effect analysis for Java programs. In VMCAI, volume 3385 of LNCS, pages 199-215. Springer, 2005.