Tree mortality in mixed pine-hardwood stands defoliated by the European gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.)

Forest Science

Volumn 53, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 683-691

  Eisenbies, Mark H ^a   Davidson, Christopher ^b   Johnson, James ^c   Amateis, Ralph ^a   Gottschalk, Kurt ^d  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b International Paper   (United States)

^c OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d US Forest Service   (United States)

Author keywords

Lepidoptera; Logistic regression; Lymantriidae; Pine oak; Stand dynamics; Vulnerability

Indexed keywords

LEPIDOPTERA; LOGISTIC REGRESSION; LYMANTRIIDAE; STAND DYNAMICS;

FORESTRY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

HARDWOODS;

DEFOLIATION; HARDWOODS; PINUS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

LEPIDOPTERA; LIQUIDAMBAR; LYMANTRIA; LYMANTRIA DISPAR; LYMANTRIIDAE; QUERCUS;

EID: 37149052491     PISSN: 0015749X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. AMRHEIN, J.F. 1988. Modeling the impact of gypsy moth defoliation in individual tree mortality and basal area growth of northern hardwoods of Central Pennsylvania. M.S. thesis, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA. 99 p.
2. BAKER, W.L. 1941. Effect of gypsy moth defoliation on certain forest trees. J. For. 39:1017-1022.
3. BARBOSA, P., AND M.R. WAGNER. 1989. Introduction to forest and shade tree insects. Academic Press, San Diego. 639 p.
4. BROWN, J.H., D.B. HALLIWELL., AND W.P. GOULD. 1979. Gypsy moth defoliation: Impact in Rhode Island forests. J. For. 77:30-32.
5. CAMPBELL, R.W., AND A.S. GARLOW. 1982. Gypsy moth in New Jersey pine-oak. J. For. 80:89-90.
6. CAMPBELL, R.W., AND R.J. SLOAN. 1977. Forest stand responses to defoliation by the gypsy moth. Society of American Foresters, Bethesda, MD. 34 p.
7. COLLETT, D. 2003. Modelling binary data. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. 387 p.
8. CROW, G.R., AND R.R. HICKS. 1990. Predicting mortality in mixed oak stands following spring insect defoliation. For. Sci. 36:831-841.
9. DAVIDSON, C.B., K.W. GOTTSCHALK., AND J.E. JOHNSON. 1999. Tree mortality following defoliation by the European gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.) in the United States: A review. For. Sci. 45:74-84.
10. DAVIDSON, C.B., K.W. GOTTSCHALK, AND J.E. JOHNSON. 2001a. European gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.) outbreaks: A review of the literature. US For. Serv. GTR-NE-278. 15 p.
11. DAVIDSON, C.B., J.E. JOHNSON., K.W. GOTTSCHALK, AND R.L. AMATEIS. 2001b. Prediction of stand susceptibility and gypsy moth defoliation in Coastal Plain mixed pine hardwoods. Can. J. For. Res. 31:1914-1921.
12. DUNBAR, D.M., AND G.R. STEPHENS. 1975. Association of two-lined chestnut borer and shoestring fungus with mortality of defoliated oak in Connecticut. For. Sci. 21:169-174.
13. FAJVAN, M.A., AND J.M. WOOD. 1996. Stand structure and development after gypsy moth defoliation in the Appalachian Plateau. For. Ecol. Manag. 89(1-3):79-88.
14. FOSBROKE, D.A., AND R.R. HICKS. 1989. Tree mortality following gypsy moth defoliation in southwestern Pennsylvania. P. 74-80 in Proc. 7th central hardwood conference, Rink, G., and C.A. Budelsky (eds.). US For. Serv. GTR-NC-132.
15. FOSTER, D.R., AND D.A. ORWIG. 2006. Preemptive and salvage harvesting of New England forests: When doing nothing is a viable alternative. Conserv. Biol. 20:959-970.
16. GOTTSCHALK, K.W. 1990. Economic evaluation of gypsy moth damage in the United States of America. P. 235-246 in IUFRO XIX World Congress 1990. Canadian IUFRO World Congress Organizing Committee, Montreal, QC, Canada.
17. GOTTSCHALK, K.W. 1993. Silvicultural guidelines for forest stands threatened by the gypsy moth. US For. Serv. GTR-NE-171.
18. GOTTSCHALK, K.W., J.J. COLBERT., AND D.L. FEICHT. 1998. Tree mortality risk of oak due to gypsy moth. Eur. J. Forest Pathol. 28(2):121-132.
19. GOTTSCHALK, K.W., AND R.W. MCFARLANE. 1993. Photographic guide to crown condition of oaks: Use for gypsy moth silvicultural treatments. US For. Serv. GTR-NE-168.
20. HERRICK, O.W., AND D.A. GANSNER. 1987. Gypsy moth on a new frontier: Forest tree defoliation and mortality. North. J. Appl. For. 4:128-133.
21. HICKS, C.R., AND K.V.J. TURNER. 1999. Fundamental concepts in the design of experiments. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. 565 p.
22. HOSMER, D.W., AND S. LEMESHOW. 1989. Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New York, NY. 392 p.
23. HOUSTON, D.R. 1981. Mortality and factors affecting disease development. P. 281-293 in The gypsy moth: Research toward integrated pest management, Doane, C.C., and M.L. McManus (eds.). US For. Serv. Tech. Bull. 1584.
24. JEDLICKA, J., J. VANDERMEER, K. AVILES- VAZQUEZ, O. BARROS, AND I. PERFECTO. 2004. Gypsy moth defoliation of oak trees and a positive response of red maple and black cherry: An example of indirect interaction. Am. Midl. Nat. 152(2):231-236.
25. JOHNSON, D.M., A.M. LIEBHOLD., AND O.N. BJORNSTAD. 2006. Geographical variation in the periodicity of gypsy moth outbreaks. Ecography 29(3):367-374.
26. KEGG, J.D. 1971. The impact of gypsy moth: Repeated defoliation of oak in New Jersey. J. For. 69:852-854.
27. KOZLOWSKI, T.T., P.J. KRAMER, AND S.G. PALLARDY. 1991. The physiological ecology of woody plants. Academic Press, New York, NY. 657 p.
28. KULMAN, H.M. 1971. Effects of insect defoliation on growth and mortality of trees. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 16:289-324.
29. LIEBHOLD, A., J. ELKINTON, D. WILLIAMS, AND R.M. MUZIKA. 2000. What causes outbreaks of the gypsy moth in North America? Popul. Ecol. 42(3):257-266.
30. LIEBHOLD, A.M., K.W. GOTTSCHALK, R.M. MUZIKA, M.E. MONTGOMORY, R. YOUNG, K. O'DAY, AND B. KELLEY. 1995. Suitability of North American tree species to the gypsy moth: A summary of field and laboratory test. US For. Serv. GTR-NE-211. 45 pp.
31. LIEBHOLD, A.M., R.M. MUZIKA., AND K.W. GOTTSCHALK. 1998. Does thinning affect gypsy moth dynamics? For. Sci. 44(2):239-245.
32. MCGRAW, J.B., K.W. GOTTSCHALK., M.C. VAVREK, AND A.L. CHESTER. 1990. Interactive effects of resource availabilities and defoliation on photosynthesis, growth and mortality of red oak seedlings. Tree Physiol. 7:247-254.
33. MONSERUD, R.A., T. LEDERMANN, AND H. STERBA. 2005. Are self-thinning constraints needed in a tree-specific mortality model? For. Sci. 50:848-858.
34. MONTGOMORY, D.C., E.A. PECK, AND G.G. VINING. 2001. Introduction to linear regression analysis. Wiley Interscience, New York, NY. 641 p.
35. MONTGOMORY, M.E. 1991. Variation in the suitability of tree species for the gypsy moth. P. 1-13 in US Interagency gypsy moth research review. Gottschalk, K.W., M.J. Twery, and S.I. Smith (eds.). Tech. Bull. 1584.
36. MORIN, R.S., A.M. LIEBHOLD, E.R. LUZADER, A.J. LISTER, K.W. GOTTSCHALK, AND D.B. TWARDUS. 2005. Mapping host-species abundance of three major exotic forest pests. US For. Ser. Res. Pap. NE-726. 11 pp.
37. MUZIKA, R.M., AND A. LIEBHOLD. 2000. A critique of silvicultural approaches to managing defoliating insects in North America. Agr. For. Entomol. 2:97-105.
38. PARKER, J. 1981. Effects of defoliation on oak chemistry. P. 219-225 in The gypsy moth: Research toward integrated pest management, Doane, C.C., and M.L. McManus (eds.). US For. Ser. Tech. Bull. 1584.
39. POTHIER, D., AND D. MAILLY. 2006. Stand-level prediction of balsam fir mortality in relation to spruce budworm defoliation. Can. J. For. Res. 36:1631-1640.
40. PRETZSCH, H., AND P. BIBER. 2005. A Re-evaluation of Reineke's rule and stand density index. Forest Sci. 51:304-320.
41. RAFES, P. 1970. Estimation of the effects of phytophagous insects on forest production. P. 100-106 in Analysis of temperate forest ecosystems, Reichle, D.E. (ed.). Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
42. SCHWEINGRUBER, F.H. 1988. Tree rings: Basics and application of dendrochronology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA. 276 p.
43. SHAROV, A.A., D. LEONARD, A.M. LIEBHOLD, E.A. ROBERTS, AND W. DICKERSON. 2002. "Slow the spread": A national program to contain the gypsy moth. J. For. 100:30-35.
44. TOBIN, P.C., AND S.L. WHITMIRE. 2005. Spread of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: lymantriidae) and its relationship to defoliation. Environ. Entomol. 34(6):1448-1455.
45. TWERY, M.J. 1991. Effects of defoliation by gypsy moth. P. 27-39 in US Interagency gypsy moth research review, Gottschalk, K.W., M.J. Twery, and S.I. Smith (eds.) Tech. Bull. 1584.
46. WARGO, P.M. 1981. Defoliation and secondary-action organism attack: With emphasis on Armillaria mella. J. Aboricult. 7:64-69.
47. WARGO, P.M., AND D.R. HOUSTON. 1974. Infection of defoliated sugar maple trees by Armillaria mella. Phytopathology 64:817-822.
48. WARING, K.M., AND K.L. O'HARA. 2005. Silvicultural strategies in forest ecosystems affected by introduced pests. For. Ecol. Manag. 209(1-2):27-41.
49. WHITMIRE, S.L., AND P.C. TOBIN. 2006. Persistence of invading gypsy moth populations in the United States. Oecologia 147:230-237.
50. WICKMAN, B.E. 1980. Increased growth of white fir after Douglas-fir tussock moth outbreak. J. For. 78:31-33.
51. WILDER, J.W. 2001. Effect of initial condition sensitivity and chaotic transients on predicting future outbreaks of gypsy moths. Ecol. Model. 136:49-66.
52. YANG, Y, S.J. TITUS, AND S. HUANG. 2003. Modeling individual tree mortality for white spruce in Alberta. Ecol. Model. 163:209-222.