Technologies of suspicion: Coercion and compassion in post-disciplinary surveillance regimes

Surveillance and Society

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 78-92

  Campbell, Nancy D ^a  

^a RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 37149047420     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14777487     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. American Civil Liberties Union. (1999) Drug Testing: A Bad Investment. New York: ACLU.
2. Brennan, T. (2003) Globalization and Its Terrors: Daily Life in the West. New York: Routledge.
3. Campbell, N. D. (Forthcoming 2004) Suspect Technologies: Scrutinizing the Intersection of Science, Technology, and Policy, Science, Technology, and Human Values. 29(4).
4. Campbell, N. D. (2000) Using Women: Gender, Drug Policy, and Social Justice. New York: Routledge.
5. Carey, C. A. (1998) Crafting a Challenge to the Practice of Drug Testing Welfare Recipients, Buffalo Law Review. 46: 285-345.
6. Center for Reproductive Rights (2002) Court Upholds Rights of Pregnant Women: Medical University of South Carolina Drug Testing Scheme Found Unconstitutional. http://www.reproductiverights.org Accessed 19 January 2003.
7. Chasnoff, I. (1990) The Prevalence of Illicit-Drug or Alcohol Use During Pregnancy and Discrepancies in Mandatory Reporting in Pinellas County, Florida, New England Journal of Medicine 322(17): 1202-1206.
8. Cropanzano, R. and M.A. Konovsky (1993) Justice Considerations in Employee Drug Testing. In R. Cropanzano (ed.) Justice in the Workplace: Approaching Fairness in Human Resource Management. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 207-257.
9. Currie, E. (1993) Reckoning: Drugs, the Cities, and the American Future. New York: Hill and Wang.
10. Deleuze, G. (1986) Foucault (trans. S. Hand). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
11. Epstein, S. (1996) Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
12. Eubanks, V. (2002) Unpublished dissertation proposal. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
13. Foucault, M. (1979) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (trans. A. Sheridan). New York: Vintage Books.
14. Foucault, M. (1988) The Political Technology of Individuals. In L. H. Martin, Gutman, and Hutton (eds.) Technologies of the Self. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press, 147-162.
15. Foucault, M. (1994) The Ethics of Concern for the Self as a Practice of Freedom. In P. Rabinow (ed.) Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954-1984. v.1 (trans. Robert Hurley and others). New York: The New Press, 281-330.
16. Foucault, M. (2000) Truth and Juridical Forms. In J.D. Faubion (ed.) Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954-1984. v.3 (trans. R. Hurley and others). New York: The New Press, 1-89.
17. Gilbert, N. (2002) Transformation of the Welfare State: The Silent Surrender of Public Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Gorodetzky, C. W., C. R. Angel, D. J. Beach, D. H. Catlin, and S. Yeh (1974) Validity of screening methods for drugs of abuse in biological fluids: I. Heroin in urine, Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 15(5): 461-472.
19. Grant, B. F. and D. A. Dawson (1996) Alcohol and Drug Use, Abuse, and Dependence among Welfare Recipients, American Journal of Public Health. 86(10): 1450-1454.
20. Greenhouse, L. (2001) High Court Bars Some Drug Tests, New York Times 22 March.
21. Hardt, M. and A. Negri (2000) Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Hirsch, J. S. (1995) Psychemedics Stock Surges 71% on News of Private Drug Test, Wall Street Journal 13 July, B7.
23. Hoffman, A. and J. Silvers (1987) Steal This Urine Test: Fighting Drug Hysteria in America. New York; Penguin Books.
24. Keane, H. (2002) What’s Wrong with Addiction? New York: New York University Press.
25. Klein, H.K., and D.L. Kleinman (2002) The Social Construction of Technology: Structural Considerations, Science, Technology, and Human Values 27(1):
26. Lyon, D. (1993) An Electronic Panopticon? A Sociological Critique of Surveillance Theory, Sociological Review, 41: 653-678.
27. Lyon, D. (1994) The Electronic Eye: The Rise of Surveillance Society. Oxford: Polity Press.
28. McFadden, C. (2000) ‘How Far Can You Go to Protect an Unborn Child? Pregnant Women Arrested for Using Drugs.’ Nightline, ABC News. September 27, 2000.
29. Paltrow, L. M. (2001) The War on Drugs and the War on Abortion. Southern University Law Review, 28(3): 201-253.
30. Reeves, J. L. and R. Campbell (1994) Cracked Coverage: Television News, the Anti-cocaine Crusade, and the Reagan Legacy, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
31. Schneider, A.L. and H. M. Ingram (1997) Policy Design for Democracy. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
32. Sewell, G. (1995) On the Possibility of a Sociology of Workplace Surveillance. Paper given at the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting. Chicago, IL. 26 November.
33. Shapin, S. (1994) A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth Century England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34. U.S. Supreme Court. Ferguson v. City of Charleston (2001) 99-936.
35. Vaz, P. and F. Bruno (2003) Types of Self-Surveillance: From Abnormality to Individuals ‘at Risk’. Surveillance and Society, 1(3): 272-291. http://www.surveillance-and-society.org/articles1(3)/self.pdf