Sex offender laws in America: Can panic-driven legislation ever create safer societies?

Criminal Justice Studies

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 423-443

  Meloy, Michelle L ^a   Saleh, Yustina ^a   Wolff, Nancy ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Civil commitment; Community notification; Sex offender laws; Sex offender registration

Indexed keywords

EID: 37149027791     PISSN: 1478601X     EISSN: 14786028     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14786010701758211     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Alabama Department of Public Safety & Alabama Criminal Justice Information Center (2001) Summary of state sex offender registries
2. Alexander, M. A. (1999) Sexual offender treatment efficacy revisited. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 11, pp. 101-116.
3. Alexander, R. J. (2004) The United States Supreme Court and the civil commitment of sex offenders. The Prison Journal, 84, pp. 361-378.
4. Aos, S., Phipps, O., Barnoski, R. and Lieb, R. (2001) The comparative costs and benefits of programs to reduce crime, Washington State Institute for Public Policy, Olympia, WA
5. Avrahamian, K. (1998) A critical perspective: Do 'Megan's Laws' really shield children from sex predators?. Journal of Juvenile Law, 19, pp. 1-18.
6. Barnoski, R. (2005) Sex offender sentencing in Washington State: Has community notification reduced recidivism?, Washington State Institute for Public Policy, Olympia, WA
7. Barnoski, R. (2006) Sex offender sentencing in Washington State: Failure to register as a sex offender-revised, Washington State Institute for Public Policy, Olympia, WA
8. Bilbrey, R. (1999) Civil commitment of sexually violent predators: A misguided attempt to solve a serious problem. Journal of the Missouri Bar, 55:6
9. Braithwaite, J. (1989) Crime, shame, and reintegration, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York
10. Bureau of Justice Statistics (2004) Criminal victimization, 2003, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC
11. Cohen, S. (1972) Folk devils and moral panics, MacGibbon and Kee, London
12. CSOM (1999) Sex offender registration: Policy overview and comprehensive practices
13. Cumming, G. and McGrath, R. (2005) Supervision of the sex offender, The Safer Society Foundation
14. Drake, E. and Barnoski, R. (2006) Sex offenders in Washington State: Key findings and trends, Washington State Institute for Public Policy, Olympia, WA
15. Fitch, W. L. (2003) Sexual offender commitment laws in the United States: Legislative and policy concerns. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, pp. 489-501.
16. Greenfeld, L (1997) Sex offenses and offenders: An analysis of data on rape and sexual assault, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC
17. Hall, G. (1995) Sex offender recidivism revisited: A meta-analysis of recent treatment studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, pp. 802-809.
18. Hanson, R. K., Gordon, A., Harris, A. J. R., Marques, J. K., Murphy, W. and Quinsey, V. L. (2002) First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effectiveness of psychological treatments for sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, pp. 169-194.
19. Hay, C. (2001) An exploratory test of Braithwaite's reintegrative shaming theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38, pp. 132-153.
20. Janus, E. S. (2000) Sexual predator commitment laws: Lessons for law and the behavioral sciences. Behavioral Science and the Law, 18:1, pp. 5-21.
21. La Fond, J. (2000) The future of involuntary civil commitment in the U.S.A. after Kansas v. Hendricks. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, pp. 153-167.
22. Lewis, R. (1988) Effectiveness of statutory requirements for the registration of sex offenders: A report to the California State legislature California Department of Justice
23. Lieb, R. and Gookin, K. (2005) Involuntary commitment of sexually violent predators: Comparing state laws, Washington State Institute for Public Policy, Olympia, WA
24. Lieb, R. and Matson, S. (1998) Sexual predator commitment laws in the United States: 1998 update, Washington State Institute for Public Policy, Olympia, WA
25. Lösel, F. and Schmucker, M. (2005) The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, pp. 114-117.
26. Matson, S. and Lieb, R. (1996) Sex offender registration: A review of state laws, Washington State Institute for Public Policy, Olympia, WA
27. Matson, S. and Lieb, R. (1997) Megan's Law: A review of state and federal legislation, Washington State Institute for Public Policy, Olympia, WA
28. McGrath, R., Cumming, G. and Burchard, B. (2003) Current practices and trends in sexual abuser management: The Safer Society 2002 nationwide survey, The Safer Society Foundation
29. McGrath, R., Cumming, G. and Holt, J. (2002) Collaboration among sex offender treatment providers and probation and parole officers: The beliefs and behaviors of treatment providers. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, pp. 49-65.
30. McGrath, R., Cumming, G. and Livingston, J. (2003) Outcome of a treatment program for adult sex offenders: From prison to community. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, pp. 3-17.
31. Meloy, M. L. (2006) Sex offenses and the men who commit them, University Press of New England, Boston
32. Meyer, W. J., Molett III, M., Richards, D., Arnold, L. and Latham, J. (2003) Outpatient civil commitment in Texas for management and treatment of sexually violent predators: A preliminary report. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47:4, pp. 396-406.
33. Petrosino, A. J. and Petrosino, C. (1999) The public safety potential of Megan's Law in Massachusetts: An assessment from a sample of criminal sexual psychopaths. Crime & Delinquency, 45, pp. 140-158.
34. Rice, M. and Harris, G. (2003) The size and sign of treatment effects in sex offender therapy. Annals New York Academy of Sciences, 989, pp. 428-440.
35. Schram, D. and Milloy, C. (1995) Community notification: A study of offender characteristics and recidivism, Washington State Institute for Public Policy, Olympia, WA
36. Seager, J., Jellicoe, D. and Dhaliwal, G. (2004) Refusers, dropouts, and completers: Measuring sex offender treatment efficacy. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48, pp. 600-612.
37. Small, J. (1999) Who are the people in your neighborhood? Due process, public protection, and sex offender notification laws. New York University Law Review, 74, pp. 1465-1467.
38. Snyder, H. (2000) Sexual assault of young children as reported to law enforcement: Victim, incident, and offender characteristics, Bureau of Justice Statistics, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC
39. Steinbock, B. (1995) A policy perspective (New Jersey), Megan's Law: Community notification of the release of sex offenders. Criminal Justice Ethics, 14, pp. 4-9.
40. Terry, K. (2006) Sexual offenses and offenders: Theory, practice and policy, Thomson Wadsworth, Belmont, CA
41. Travis, J. (1997) Sex offender community notification, NIJ Research in Action Series
42. Walker, J. T., Madden, S., Vásquez, B. E., VanHouten, A. C. and Ervin-Mcarty, G. (2006) The influence of sex offender registration and notification laws in the United States
43. Welchans, S. (2005) Megan's Law: Evaluations of sexual offender registries. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 16, pp. 123-140.
44. West, M., Homes, C. S. and Wenger, P. (2000) State sex offender treatment programs: 50-state survey, Colorado Department of Corrections
45. (2003) Protecting society from sexually dangerous offenders: Law, justice, and therapy, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC
46. Zevitz, R. and Farkas, M. (2000) Sex offender community notification: Assessing the impact in Wisconsin, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC