MRI and endoscopic ultrasonography in the staging of gastric cancer;Resonancia magnética y ecoendoscopia para el estadiaje del cáncer gástrico

Revista Espanola de Enfermedades Digestivas

Volumn 98, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 582-590

  Arocena, M G ^a   Barturen, A ^b   Bujanda, Luis ^c,f   Casado, O ^d   Ramirez M M ^a   Oleagoitia, J M ^b   Galdiz Iturri, M ^a   Mugica P ^a   Cosme, A ^c   Gutierrez Stampa M A ^c   Zapata, E ^a   Echenique Elizondo, M ^e  

^a Hospital de San Eloy   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL DE CRUCES   (Spain)

^c HOSPITAL DONOSTIA   (Spain)

^d OSATEK   (Spain)

^e UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

^f NONE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Endoscopic ultrasound; Gastric cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ENDOSCOPIC BIOPSY; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STOMACH CANCER; COMPARATIVE STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PREOPERATIVE CARE; STOMACH TUMOR;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ENDOSONOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STOMACH NEOPLASMS;

EID: 37149023504     PISSN: 11300108     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4321/S1130-01082006000800003     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. a. ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2002. p. 829-48.
2. Hohenberger P, Gretschel S. Gastric cancer. Lancet 2003; 362: 305-15.
3. Fukuya T, Honda H, Haneko K, Kmoiwa T, Yoshimitsu K, Irie E, et al. Efficacy of helical CT in T staging of gastric cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997; 21: 73-81.
4. Sohn KM, Lee JM, Lee SY, Ahn BY, Park SM, Kim KM. Comparing MR imaging and CT in the staging of gastric carcinoma. AJR 2000; 174: 1551-7.
5. Kim AY, Han JK, Seong CK, Kim TK, Choi BI. MRI in staging advanced gastric cancer: Is it useful compared with spiral CT? J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000; 24: 389-94.
6. Penman ID, Shen EF. EUS in advanced esophageal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56 (Supl. 4): 2-6.
7. Savides TJ, Master SS. EUS in rectal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56 (Supl. 4): 12-8.
8. Botet JF, Lightdale CJ, Zauber AG, Gerdes H, Winawer SJ, Urmacher C, et al. Preoperative staging of gastric cancer: comparison of endoscopic US and dynamic CT. Radiology 1991; 181: 426-32.
9. Lightdale CJ. Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis, staging and follow-up of esophageal and gastric cancer. Endoscopy 1992; 24: 297-303.
10. Ziegler K, Sanft C, Zimmer T, Zeitz M, Felsenberg D, Stein H, et al. Comparison of computed tomography, endosonography, and intraoprative assessment in TN staging of gastric carcinoma. Gut 1993; 34: 604-10.
11. Hermanek P, Sobin LH. Digestive system tumors. In: Hermanek P, Sobin LH, eds. TNM classification of malignant tumors. 4th ed, 2nd rev. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1992. p. 45-8.
12. Vickers J, Alderson D. Oesophageal cancer staging using endoscopic ultrasonography. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 994-8.10.
13. Sato C, Naganawa S, Kumada H, Miura S, Ishigaki T. MR imaging of gastric cancer in vitro: accuracy of invasion depth diagnosis. Eur Radiol 2004; 14: 1543-9.
14. Grimm H, Soehendra N, Hamper K, Maas R. Contribution of endosonography to preoperative staging in esophageal and stomach cancer. Chirurg 1989; 60: 684-9.
15. Natterman C, Galbenu-Grunwald R, Nier H, Dancygier H. Endoscopic ultrasound in TN staging of stomach cancer. A comparison with computerized tomography and conventional ultrasound. Z Gesamte Inn Med 1993; 48: 60-4.
16. Isozaki H, Okajima K, Nomura E, Fujii K, Sako S, Izumi N, et al. Preoperative diagnosis and surgical treatment for lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 1996; 23: 1275-83.
17. Perng DS, Jan CM, Wang WM, Chen LT, Su YC, Liu GC, et al. Computed tomography, endoscopic ultrasonography and intraoperative assessment in TN staging of gastric carcinoma. J Formos Med Assoc 1996; 95: 378-85.
18. Polkowski M, Palucki J, Wronska E, Szawlowski A, Nasierowska-Guttmejer A, Butruk E. Endosonography versus helical computed tomography for locoregional staging of gastric cancer. Endoscopy 2004; 36: 617-23.
19. Bhandari S, Shim CS, Kim JH, Jung IS, Cho JY, Lee JS, et al. Usefulness of three-dimensional, multidetector row CT (virtual gastroscopy and multiplanar reconstruction) in the evaluation of gastric cancer: a comparison with conventional endoscopy, EUS, and histopathology. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 619-26.
20. Fukuya T, Honda H, Hayashi T, Kaneko K, Tateshi Y, Ro T, et al. Lymph-node metastases: efficacy of detection with helical CT in patients with gastric cancer. Radiology 1995; 197: 505-11.
21. Adachi Y, Sakino I, Matsumata T, Iso Y, Yoh R, Kitano S, et al. Preoperative assessment of advanced gastric carcinoma using computed tomography. Am J Gastroenterol 1997; 92: 872-5.
22. Yun M, Lim JS, Hoh SH, Hyung WJ, Cheong JH, Bong JK, et al. Lymph node staging of gastric cancer using (18) F-FDG PET: a comparison study with CT. J Nucl Med 2005, 46: 1582-8.
23. Kim AY, Kim HJ, Ha HK. Gastric cancer by multidetector row CT: preoperative staging. Abdom Imaging 2005; 30: 465-72.
24. D'Elia F, Zingarelli A, Palli D, Grani M. Hydro-dynamic CT preoperative staging of gastric cancer: correlation with pathological findings. A prospective study of 107 cases. Eur Radiol 2000; 10: 1877-85.