Epistemology & the nature of science: A classroom strategy

American Biology Teacher

Volumn 69, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 525-530

  Viney, Mike ^a,b  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^b Poudre School District   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 37149012375     PISSN: 00027685     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1662/0002-7685(2007)69[525:ETNOSA]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Clarke, R.W. (1971). Einstein: The Life and Times. New York: The World Publishing Co.
2. Coyne, J. (2005), The faith that dare not speak its name: The case against intelligent design. The New Republic, 233(4), 21-33.
3. Darwin, C. (2004). The Origin of Species. New York: Fine Creative Media. (Originally published in 1859).
4. Gilkey, L. (1985). Creationism on Trial: Evolution and God at Little Rock. San Francisco: Harper & Row Publishers.
5. Gould, S.J. (2000). The Lying Stones of Marrakech: Penultimate Reflections in Natural History. New York: Harmony Books.
6. Harrison, P. (2001). Curiosity, forbidden knowledge, and the reformation of natural philosophy in modern England. Isis, 92, 265-290.
7. Hay, E.A., Nehru, C.E. & Wiswall, C.G. (2003). Plate tectonics and the origin of magma. In Richard M. Busch (Ed.), Laboratory Manual in Physical Geology (pp.20-35). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8. James, W. (1943), Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking. New York: Longman Green. (Originally published in 1907).
9. James, W. (1978). Essays in Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published in 1910).
10. Jones, J. III. (2005), Memorandum Opinion in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. Tammy Kitzmiller et al. (Plaintiffs) v. Dover Area School District et al. (Defendants). Available online at: http://www.pamd.uscourts.gov/kitzmiller/kitzmiller_342.pdf#search= %22dover%20ID%decision%22.
11. Kenrick, P. & Davis, P. (2004). Fossil Plants. London: Natural History Museum.
12. Kitcher, P. (1982). Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism. Cambridge: MIT Press.
13. Overton, W.R. (1984). Decision of the court. In Ashley Montagu (Ed.), Science and Creationism, pp. 365-397. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
14. Peirce, C.S. (1955). In Justus Buchler (Ed.), Philosophical Writings of Peirce. New York: Dover Publications.
15. Pennock, R.T. (2000). Tower of Babel: The Evidence Against the New Creationism. Chicago: MIT Press.
16. Popper, K.R. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson. (Original work published 1935).
17. Rauch, J. (1994). Kindly Inquisitors: The New Attacks on Free Thought. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
18. Ruse, M. (1999). The Darwinian Revolution: Science Red in Tooth and Claw. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
19. Ruse, M. (2005). The Evolution-Creation Struggle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Viney, W. & King D.B. (2003). A History of Psychology: Ideas and Context. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
21. Watson, J. D. (1968). The Double Helix. New York: New American Library.
22. Weissglass, J. & Sarason, S.B. (1998). Ripples of Hope: Building Relationships for Educational Change. The Center for Educational Change in Mathematics and Science. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California-Santa Barbara. For more information visit: EMELI Web site at: http://emeli. education.ucsb.edu/.
23. Whitehead, A.N. (1971). Concept of Nature. London: University of Cambridge Press.