The Trelleborg project: A process evaluation of a multi-sector community intervention to reduce alcohol consumption and related harm

Substance Use and Misuse

Volumn 42, Issue 12-13, 2007, Pages 2041-2051

  Stafström, Martin ^a   Larsson, Stig ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Alcohol consumption; Community based intervention; Consensus; Cross sectoral community action; Institutional theories; Institutionalization; Ownership; Policy implementation; Prevention; Process evaluation; Social change; Stakeholders; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMMUNITY; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONFERENCE PAPER; ENVIRONMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INSTITUTIONALIZATION; INTERVENTION STUDY; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SOCIAL CHANGE;

ALCOHOLISM; COMMUNITY NETWORKS; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; POLICY MAKING; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RISK REDUCTION BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL CHANGE; SWEDEN;

EID: 37149008354     PISSN: 10826084     EISSN: 15322491     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10826080701533013     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Abrahamson, E., Rosenkopf, L. (1997). Social network effects on the extent of innovation diffusion: A computer simulation. Organization Science 8:289-309.
2. DiMaggio, P. J., Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 35:147-160.
3. Edwards, G. (Ed.). (1994). Alcohol policy and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Etzioni, A. (1966). Studies in social change. New York: Holt, Rinehart Winston.
5. Giesbrecht, N., Ferris, J. (1993). Community-based research initiatives in prevention. Addiction 88(Suppl.):S83-S93.
6. Holder, H. D., Edwards, G. (Eds.). (1995). Alcohol and public policy: Evidence and issues. New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Holmila, M. (Ed.). (1997). Community prevention of alcohol problems. London: Macmillan.
8. Krueger, R. A. (1988). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9. Larsson, S., Hanson, B. S. (1990). Ethical and political issues encountered in conducting community action programs: Experiences from the Kirseberg Project in Sweden. In T. K. Greenfield R. Zimmerman (Eds.), Research, action, and the community: Experiences in the prevention of alcohol and other drug problems (OSAP Prevention Monograph 4). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
10. Meyer, J. W., Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83:340-363.
11. Perry, C. L., Williams, C. L., Komro, K. A., Veblen-Mortenson, S., Stigler, M. H., Munson, K. A., et al. (2002). Project Northland: Long-term outcomes of community action to reduce adolescent alcohol use. Health Education Research 17:117-132.
12. Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the grass roots. Berkeley: University of California Press.
13. Stafström, M., Östergren, P.-O., Larsson, S., Lindgren, B., Lundborg, P. (2006). A community action program for reducing harmful drinking behaviour among adolescents: The Trelleborg Project. Addiction 6:147-157.
14. Stout, R. L. (1994). Final report of the Rhode Island Community Alcohol Abuse and Injury Prevention Project. Report to National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Providence, RI: Rhode Island Department of Health.
15. Wagenaar, A. C., Murray, D. M., Gehan, J. P., Wolfson, M., Forster, J. L., Toomey, T. L., et al. (2000). Communities mobilizing for change on alcohol: Outcomes from a randomized community trial. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 61:85-94.
16. Zucker, L. G. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology 13:443-464.