Board characteristics of Australian IPOs: An analysis in light of the ASX best practice recommendations

Australian Accounting Review

Volumn 14, Issue 32, 2004, Pages 25-32

  Rosa, Ray Da Silva ^a   Izan, H Y ^a   Lin, Michelle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 37149005382     PISSN: 10356908     EISSN: 18352561     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2004.tb00280.x     Document Type: Note

References (12)

1. ASX, 2003, Principles of Good Corporate Governance and Best Practice Recommendations.
2. Buffini, F., 2003a, “ASX Board Rule may be Relaxed”, Australian Financial Review, 16 June.
3. Buffini, F., 2003b, “Clashes in War of Independence”, Australian Financial Review, 20 June.
4. Buffini, F., 2003c, “Directors May ‘choke’ on Governance - Mansfield”, Australian Financial Review, 6 June.
5. Cameron, A., 2003, “Independence - All Those in Favour?", CCH Across the Board newsletter, 17 June.
6. Cornell, S. A., 2003, “Losing Direction”, Australian Financial Review, 12 July.
7. Fama, E. E., and M. C. Jensen., 1983, “Separation of Ownership and Control”, Journal of Law and Economics 26, 2: 301-25.
8. Gluyas, R., 2003, “The Dissenting Director”, Weekend Australian, 27 September.
9. Lawson, M., 2003, “Australian Stock Exchange Ready to Scrub Clean the Nation’s Boardroom Tables”, Australian Financial Review, 10 July.
10. Nicholas, K., 2003, “ASX Sparks Corporate Governance Revolt”, Australian Financial Review, 14 April.
11. Pheasant, B., and E. Buffini., 2003, “ASX Agrees to Review New Code”, Australian Financial Review, 27 June.
12. Stapledon, G. p., 1998, “The Hampel Report on Corporate Governance”, Company and Securities Law Journal 16: 408-13.