Diverging convergences

Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 343-357

  Laurent, Brice ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOTECHNOLOGY; CONVERGENCE; NANOTECHNOLOGY; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

EURASIA; EUROPE; FRANCE; GRENOBLE; ISERE; RHONE-ALPES; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 37149003631     PISSN: 13511610     EISSN: 14698412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13511610701760804     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (45)

1. Agence d'Etudes et de Promotion de l'Isère (AEPI) (2003) Les Biotechnologies. Une convergence de disciplines pour les sciences de la vie
2. Albus, J. (2002) Engineering of mind to enhance human productivity. Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance, pp. 283-294. NSF/DOC sponsored report, Arlington, VA
3. Blanc, C. (2004) Pour un écosystème de la croissance, Rapport au Premier Ministre, Paris, Assemblée Nationale
4. Caron, F. (2000) Le dialogue entre la science et l'industrie à Grenoble. La science et l'industrie, un mariage de raison. Revue pour l'histoire du CNRS, 2
5. Chao, A. Nanotechnologies: Refus de modernité ou d'inhumanité.
6. Cobb, M. (2005) Framing effects on public opinion about nanotechnology. Science Communication, 17:2, pp. 221-239.
7. Cobb, M. and Macoubrie, J. (2004) Public perceptions about nanotechnology: Risks, benefits and trust. Journal of Nanoparticule Research, 6:4, pp. 395-405.
8. Destot, M. (2006) Grenoble, symbole du débat public et de la confiance dans le progrès scientifique.
9. Dupuy, J. -P. (2004) Quand les technologies convergeront. Futuribles, 300
10. Dupuy, J. -P. (2006) Do we shape technologies or do they shape us?.
11. Gross, J. B. and Lewenstein, B. (2005) The salience of small: nanotechnology coverage in the American press: 1986-2004.
12. Heller, C. (2002) From scientific risk to paysan savoir-faire: Peasant expertise in the French and global debate over GM crops. Science as Culture, 11:1, pp. 5-36.
13. Huet, S. (2006) En route pour la nanosphère. Libération
14. Khushf, G. (2004) The Ethics of Nanotechnology. Vision and Values for a new Generation of Science and Engineering. Emerging Technologies and Ethical Issues in Engineering
15. Latour, B. (2005) Reassembling the Social. An Iintroduction to Actor-Network Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford
16. Laurent, B. (2007) Engaging the public in nanotechnology? Competing visions of public engagement.
17. Lettre Minatec no. 1 (2001)
18. (2002) Lettre Minatec, numéro spécial
19. Lettre Minatec no. 2 (2002) AEPI.
20. Lettre Minatec no. 8 (2004) AEPI.
21. Lettre Minatec no. 9 (2005) AEPI.
22. Macoubrie, J. (2006) Nanotechnology, public concerns, reasoning and trust in government'. Public Understanding of Science, 15, pp. 221-224.
23. Mangematin, V., Rip, A., Delemarle, A. and Robinson, D. (2005) The role of regional institutional entrepreneurs in the emergence of clusters in nanotechnology.
24. Marris, C., Wynne, B., Simmons, P. and Weldon, S. (2001) Final Report of the Public Attitudes to Biotechnology in Europe Research Project
25. Morris, D. (2004) Globalization and media democracy: The case of Indymedia. Shaping the Network Society, pp. 325-352. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press
26. Office Parlementaire d'Evaluation des Choix Scientifiques et Techniques (2003) Paris, Paris, OPECST
27. Office Parlementaire d'Evaluation des Choix Scientifiques et Techniques (2005) Paris, Paris, OPECST
28. Pestre, D. (1991) Louis Néel, le magnétisme et Grenoble, Editions du CNRS, Paris
29. PMO (2004) Louis Néel à Grenoble. La liaison militaro-scientifique.
30. PMO (2006) Et maintenant le tsunami de la communication.
31. PMO (2007) Grenoble, institut des nanosciences, ou comment nous manger le cerveau.
32. Quiret, M. (2004) Nanotechnologies, les Européens accélèrent. Les Echos
33. Robinson, D., Rip, A. and Mangematin, V. (2006) Technological agglomeration and the emergence of clusters and networks in nanotechnology.
34. (2002) NSF/DOC sponsored report, NSF/DOC sponsored report, Arlington, VA
35. Roco, M. and Bainbridge, W. (2006) Springer, Springer, Dordrecht
36. Schummer, J. (2004) Societal and ethical implications of nanotechnology: meanings, interest groups and social dynamics. Techne, 8:2
37. Schummer, J. (2004) Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 59, pp. 425-465.
38. Thomas, T. and Acuna-Narvaez, R. (2006) The convergence of biotechnology and nanotechnology: Why here? Why now?. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 12:1, pp. 105-110.
39. Thomasson, S. (2006) Nous n'avons pas peur, nous sommes en colère.
40. Topçu, S. (2006) Nucléaire: De l'engagement 'savant' aux contre-expertises associatives. Natures Sciences Sociétés, 14, pp. 249-256.
41. Touraine, A., Hegedus, Z., Dubet, F. and Wieworka, M. (1980) La prophétie anti-nucléaire, Le Seuil, Paris
42. Vallini, A. (2006) Discours pour l'inauguration de Minatec.
43. Winner, L. (1986) The Whale and the Reactor, pp. 19-39. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
44. Wynne, B. (2001) Creating public alienation: Expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs. Science as Culture, 10:4, pp. 446-4481.
45. Wynne, B. (2003) Science and Citizens, Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement, Zed Books, London