Peripartum changes of the pelvic ring: Usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging;Peripartale veränderungen des beckenringes: Wie sinnvoll ist die magnetresonanztomografie?

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 179, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 1243-1250

  Hermann, Kay Geert A ^a   Halle, H ^a   Reisshauer A ^a   Schink, T ^a   Vsianska, L ^b   Muhler M R ^a   Lembcke, A ^a   Hamm, B ^a   Bollow, M ^b  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b Augusta Kranken Anstalt   (Germany)

Author keywords

MR imaging; Pelvis; Pregnancy; Symphysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; BONE MARROW; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PELVIS; PELVIS PAIN SYNDROME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBIC BONE; PUERPERIUM; RELIABILITY; SACROILIAC JOINT; SIGNAL DETECTION; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PARITY; PELVIC BONES; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PUBIC SYMPHYSIS; PUERPERAL DISORDERS; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 37049029421     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-963508     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Kaufmann G. Beitrag zur traumatischen Symphysenruptur. Dissertation der Hohen Medizinischen Fakultät der Medizinischen Akademie zu Düsseldorf 1940
2. Kehrer E. Symphysenlockerung und Symphysenruptur. Monatsschrift der Gynäkologie 1915; 42: 321
3. Esch U. Über Symphysenruptur unter der Geburt. Inaugural-Dissertation der Hohen Medizinischen Fakultät der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität zu Münster 1938
4. Wicks T. The sacroiliac joint: a major cause of backache in pregnancy. Midwifery Today Childbirth Educ 1996; 39: 33-34
5. Colliton J. Managing Back Pain During Pregnancy. Medscape Womens Health 1997; 2: 2
6. Rungee JL. Low back pain during pregnancy. Orthopedics 1993; 16: 1339-1344
7. Daly JM, Frame PS, Rapoza PA. Sacroiliac subluxation: a common, treatable cause of low-back pain in pregnancy. Fam Pract Res J 1991; 11: 149-159
8. Kernbach-Wighton G. Die Symphysis pubica: Morphologische und traumatologische Aspekte. Göttingen: Cuvillier Verlag, 2002
9. Taylor RN, Sonson RD. Separation of the pubic symphysis. An underrecognized peripartum complication. J Reprod Med 1986; 31: 203-206
10. Owens K, Pearson A, Mason G. Symphysis pubis dysfunction - a cause of significant obstetric morbidity. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2002; 105: 143-146
11. Culligan P, Hill S, Heit M. Rupture of the symphysis pubis during vaginal delivery followed by two subsequent uneventful pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100: 1114-1117
12. Luger EJ, Arbel R, Dekel S. Traumatic separation of the symphysis pubis during pregnancy: a case report. J Trauma 1995; 38: 255-256
13. Cibils LA. Rupture of the symphysis pubis. A case report. Obstet Gynecol 1971; 38: 407-410
14. Blum M, Orovano N. Open rupture of the symphysis pubis during spontaneous delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1976; 55: 77-79
15. Musumeci R, Villa E. Symphysis pubis separation during vaginal delivery with epidural anesthesia. Case report. Reg Anesth 1994; 19: 289-291
16. Seth S, Das B, Salhan S. A severe case of pubic symphysis diastasis in pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003; 106: 230-232
17. Dunbar RP, Ries AM. Puerperal diastasis of the pubic symphysis. A case report. J Reprod Med 2002; 47: 581-583
18. Lindsey RW, Leggon RE, Wright DG et al. Separation of the symphysis pubis in association with childbearing. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1988; 70: 289-292
19. Gwozdz A, Oko S. Radiological evaluation of the changes of pubic symphysis during pregnancy and puerperium. Gynaecologia 1968; 165: 31-37
20. Bahlmann F, Merz E, Macchiella D et al. Ultrasound imaging of the symphysis fissure for evaluating damage to the symphysis in pregnancy and postpartum. Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol 1993; 197: 27-30
21. Bjorklund K, Lindgren PG, Bergstrom S et al. Sonographic assessment of symphyseal joint distention intra partum. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997; 76: 227-232
22. Bjorklund K, Nordstrom ML, Bergstrom S. Sonographic assessment of symphyseal joint distention during pregnancy and post partum with special reference to pelvic pain. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999; 78: 125-130
23. Schoellner C, Szoke N, Siegburg K. Pregnancy-associated symphysis damage from the orthopedic viewpoint - studies of changes of the pubic symphysis in pregnancy, labor and post partum. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2001; 139: 458-462
24. Pellerin M, Colau JC, Rebibo G et al. An MRI study of the normal pelvis in the immediate postpartum period. J Radiol 1999; 80: 579-584
25. Hauth E, Libera H, Kimmig R et al. Magnetresonanztomographie (MRT) des Beckens zur Beurteilung des Endometriums unter Tamoxifentherapie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2006; 178: 316-323
26. Hisaw F. Experimental relaxation of the pubic ligament of the guinea pig. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1926; 23: 661-663
27. Goldsmith LT, Weiss G, Steinetz BG. Relaxin and its role in pregnancy. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1995; 24: 171-186
28. Bryant-Greenwood GD, Mercado-Simmen R, Yamamoto SY et al. Relaxin receptors and a study of the physiological roles of relaxin. Adv Exp Med Biol 1982; 143: 289-314
29. Abramson D, Robert S, Wilson F. Relaxation of the pelvic joints in pregnancy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1934; 58: 595-613
30. Putschar WG. The structure of the human symphysis pubis with special consideration of parturition and its sequelae. Am J Phys Anthropol 1976; 45: 589-594
31. Kurzel RB, Au AH, Rooholamini SA et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of peripartum rupture of the symphysis pubis. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87: 826-829
32. Wurdinger S, Humbsch K, Reichenbach JR et al. MRI of the pelvic ring joints postpartum: normal and pathological findings. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 15: 324-329
33. Death AB, Kirby RL, MacMillan CL. Pelvic ring mobility: assessed by stress radiography. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982; 63: 204-206
34. Bjorklund K, Bergstrom S, Lindgren PG et al. Ultrasonographic measurement of the symphysis pubis: a potential method of studying symphyseolysis in pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1996; 42: 151-153
35. Huppertz R, Niethard FU, Kaps HP. Symphysis injury - clinical and ultrasound follow-up. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1990; 128: 32-33
36. MacLennan AH. Relaxin - a review. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1981; 21: 195-202
37. Borell U, Fernström I. The movements of the sacroiliac joints and their importance to change in the pelvic dimensions during parturition. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1957; 36: 42-57
38. Garagiola DM, Tarver RD, Gibson L et al. Anatomic changes in the pelvis after uncomplicated vaginal delivery: a CT study on 14 women. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989; 153: 1239-1241
39. Willms AB, Brown ED, Kettritz UI et al. Anatomic changes in the pelvis after uncomplicated vaginal delivery: evaluation with serial MR imaging. Radiology 1995; 195: 91-94
40. Woo GM, Twickler DM, Stettler RW et al. The pelvis after cesarean section and vaginal delivery: normal MR findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 161: 1249-1252
41. Thienpont E, Simon JP, Fabry G. Sacral stress fracture during pregnancy: A case report. Acta Orthop Scand 1999; 70: 525-526
42. Rousiere M, Kahan A, Job-Deslandre C. Postpartal sacral fracture without osteoporosis. Joint Bone Spine 2001; 68: 71-73
43. Dihlmann W. Die Hyperostosis triangularis ilii: Das sakroiliakale knöcherne Stressphänomen. 1. Teil (Terminologie, Definition, Morphologie). Fortschr Röntgenstr 1976; 124: 1-6
44. Olivieri I, Gemignani G, Camerini E et al. Differential diagnosis between osteitis condensans ilii and sacroiliitis. J Rheumatol 1990; 17: 1504-1512