A weighted voting mechanism for action selection problem in self-adaptive software

First International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems, SASO 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 328-331

  Salehie, Mazeiar ^a   Tahvildari, Ladan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CLOSED LOOP SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DECISION MAKING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

GOAL-ACTION-ATTRIBUTE MODEL (GAAM); SIGNIFICANT CHANGES; WEIGHTED VOTING MECHANISM;

ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS;

EID: 37049024515     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SASO.2007.4     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. G. Candea, J. Cutler, and A. Fox. Improving availability with recursive microreboots: a soft-state system case study. Performance Evaluation, 56(1-4):213-248, 2004.
2. L. Chung, B. A. Nixon, E. Yu, and J. Mylopoulos. Non-Functional Requirements in Software Engineering. Springer, 2000.
3. R. Jain. The art of computer systems performance analysis. John Wiley and Sons, 1991.
4. R. L. Keeney and H. Raiffa. Decisions With Multiple Objectives. John Wiley and Sons, 1976.
5. P. Maes. Situated agents can have goals. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 6:49-70, 1990.
6. P. K. McKinley, M. Sadjadi, E. P. Kasten, and B. H. C. Cheng. Composing adaptive software. IEEE Computer, pages 56-64, 2004.
7. J. Rosenblatt. DAMN: a distributed architecture for mobile navigation. Journal Exp. Theory AI, 9(2-3):339-360, 1997.
8. M. Salehie and L. Tahvildari. Autonomic computing: emerging trends and open problems. In Proc. of ICSE Workshop on Design and Evolution of Autonomic Application Software (DEAS), pages 82-88, 2005.
9. N. Subramanian and L. Chung. Software architecture adaptability: An NFR approach. In Proc. of Int. Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution, pages 52-61, 2001.