Giving help in return: Family reciprocity by older Singaporeans

Ageing and Society

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 5-34

  Verbrugge, Lois M ^a   Chan, Angelique ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Elderly people; Family; Help; Intergenerational transfer; Reciprocity; Singapore; Social exchange; Southeast Asia

Indexed keywords

CROSS SECTION; ELDERLY POPULATION; FAMILY STRUCTURE; INCOME; INTERGENERATIONAL TRANSFER; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; RECIPROCITY;

ASIA; EURASIA; SINGAPORE [SOUTHEAST ASIA]; SOUTHEAST ASIA;

EID: 37049024313     PISSN: 0144686X     EISSN: 14691779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0144686X07006447     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Agree, E. M., Biddlecom, A. E., Chang, M.-C. and Perez, A. E. 2002. Transfers from older parents to their adult children in Taiwan and the Philippines. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 17, 4, 269-94.
2. Agree, E. M., Biddlecom, A. E. and Valente, T. W. 2005. Intergenerational transfers of resources between older persons and extended kin in Taiwan and the Philippines. Population Studies, 59 2, 181-95.
3. Akiyama, H., Antonucci, T. C. and Campbell, R. 1997. Exchange and reciprocity among two generations of Japanese and American women. In Sokolovsky, J. (ed.), The Cultural Context of Aging. Worldwide Perspectives. Second edition, Bergin and Garvey, Westport, Connecticut, 162-78.
4. Allen, S. M., Foster, S. and Berg, K. 2001. Receiving help at home: The interplay of human and technological assistance. Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 56B, 6, S374-82.
5. Allison, P. D. 2002. Missing Data. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences 136, Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.
6. Andrews, G. R. and Hermalin, A. I. 2000. Research directions in ageing in the Asia-Pacific region: Past, present and future. In Phillips, D. R. (ed.), Ageing in the Asia-Pacific Region. Issues, Policies and Future Trends. Routledge, London, 51-81.
7. Batson, C. D. 1998. Altruism and prosocial behavior. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T. and Lindzey, G. (eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology Volume 2, McGraw-Hill, New York, 282-316.
8. Biddlecom, A., Chayovan, N. and Ofstedal, M. B. 2002. Intergenerational support and transfers. In Hermalin, A. I. (ed.), The Well-Being of the Elderly in Asia. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 185-229.
9. Blau, P. M. 1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life. Wiley, New York.
10. Boerner, K. and Reinhardt, J. P. 2003. Giving while in need: Support provided by disabled older adults. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 58B, 5, S297-304.
11. Caffrey, R. A. 1992. Caregiving to the elderly in northeast Thailand. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 7, 2, 117-34.
12. Chan, A. 1997. An overview of the living arrangements and social support exchanges of older Singaporeans. Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 12, 4, 35-50.
13. Chan, A., Straughan, P. and Teo, P. 2001. Transitions in Health, Wealth, and Welfare of Elderly Singaporeans, 1995-1999. Final Report, Department of Sociology, National University of Singapore, Singapore. (Available from Dr Angelique Chan at socchananus.edu.sg)
14. Cheng, S. T. and Chan, A. C. M. 2006. Filial piety and psychological well-being in well older Chinese. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 61, 5, P262-69.
15. Couch, K. A., Daly, M. C. and Wolf, D. A. 1999. Time? money? both? The allocation of resources to older parents. Demography, 36, 2, 219-32.
16. Dannefer, D., Uhlenberg, P., Foner, A. and Abeles, R. P. 2005. On the shoulders of a giant: The legacy of Matilda White Riley for gerontology. Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 60, 6, 296-304.
17. Deutsch, M. 1975. Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis for distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 3, 137-49.
18. Domingo, L. J. and Asis, M. M. B. 1999. Living arrangements and the flow of support between generations in The Philippines. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 10, 1-2, 21-51.
19. Frankenberg, E., Beard, V. and Saputra, M. 1999. The kindred spirit: The ties that bind Indonesian children and their parents. Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, 27, 2, 65-86.
20. Frankenberg, E., Lillard, L. and Willis, R. J. 2002. Patterns of intergenerational transfers in Southeast Asia. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 3, 627-41.
21. Gouldner, A.W. 1960. The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 2, 161-78.
22. Gouldner, A.W. 1973. For Sociology: Renewal and Critique in Sociology Today. Basic Books, New York.
23. Grundy, E. 2005. Reciprocity in relationships: Socio-economic and health influences on intergenerational exchanges between third age parents and their adult children in Great Britain. British Journal of Sociology 56, 2, 233-55.
24. Hateley, L. and Tan, G. 2003. The Greying of Asia: Causes and Consequences of Rapid Ageing in Asia. Eastern Universities Press, Singapore.
25. Hatfield, E. 1995. Equity theory and research: An overview. In McQuarie, D. (ed.), Readings in Contemporary Sociological Theory: From Modernity to Post Modernity. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 240-7.
26. Henretta, J. C., Grundy, E. and Harris, S. 2002. The influence of socio-economic and health differences on parents' provision of help to adult children: A British-United States comparison. Ageing & Society 22, 4, 441-58.
27. Hermalin, A. I. 1999. Challenges to comparative research on intergenerational transfers. Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, 27, 2, 9-20.
28. Hermalin, A. I. 2002. Theoretical perspectives, measurement issues, and related research. In Hermalin, A. I. (ed.), The Well-Being of the Elderly in Asia. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 101-41.
29. Hermalin, A. I., Ofstedal, M. B. and Chang, M.-C. 1996. Types of supports for the aged and their providers in Taiwan. In Hareven, T. K. (ed.), Aging and Generational Relations. Life-Course and Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Aldine de Gruyter, New York, 179-215.
30. Herzog, A. R., Kahn, R. L., Morgan, J. N., Jackson, J. S. and Antonucci, T. C. 1989. Age differences in productive activities. Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 44, 4, S129-38.
31. Hogan, D. P., Eggebeen, D. J. and Clogg, C. C. 1993. The structure of intergenerational exchanges in American families. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 6, 1428-58.
32. Homans, G. C. 1961. Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. Harcourt, Brace and World, New York.
33. Ingersoll-Dayton, B. and Saengtienchai, C. 1999. Respect for the elderly in Asia: Stability and change. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 48, 2, 113-30.
34. Kendig, H. L., Hashimoto, A. and Coppard, L. C. (eds) 1992. Family Support for the Elderly. The International Experience. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
35. Kim, H.-K., Hisata, M., Kai, I. and Lee, S.-K. 2000. Social support exchange and quality of life among the Korean elderly. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 15, 4, 331-47.
36. Knodel, J. (ed.) 1992. Social and economic support systems for the elderly in Asia. Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 7, 3, 1-148.
37. Knodel, J. (ed.) 1995. Focus group research on the living arrangements of elderly in Asia. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 10 1-2, 1-162.
38. Knodel, J. (ed.) 1997. Living arrangements and support among the elderly in South-East Asia. Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 12, 4, 1-102.
39. Knodel, J., Chayovan, N. and Siriboon, S. 1996. Familial support and the life course of Thai elderly and their children. In Hareven, T. K. (ed.), Aging and Generational Relations: Life-course and Cross-cultural Perspectives. Aldine de Gruyter, New York, 217-40.
40. Knodel, J., Kim, S. K., Zimmer, Z. and Puch, S. 2005. Older Persons in Cambodia: A Profile from the 2004 Survey of Elderly. Research Report 05-576, Population Studies Centre, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Available online at www.psc.isr.umich.edu/pubs/pdf/ rro5-576.pdf [Accessed 15 July 2005].
41. Knodel, J. and Ofstedal, M. B. 2002. Patterns and determinants of living arrangements. In Hermalin, A. I. (ed.), The Well-Being of the Elderly in Asia. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 143-84.
42. Krause, N., Herzog, A. R. and Baker, E. 1992. Providing support to others and well-being in later life. Journal of Gerontology, 47 5, P300-11.
43. Künemund, H. and Rein, M. 1999. There is more to receiving than needing: Theoretical arguments and empirical explorations of crowding in and crowding out. Ageing & Society, 19, 1, 93-121.
44. Lang, O. 1946. Chinese Family and Society. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut. (Reprinted 1968, Archon Books, Hamden, Connecticut.)
45. Lee, Y-J., Parish, W.L. and Willis, R.J. 1994. Sons, daughters, and intergenerational support in Taiwan. American Journal of Sociology 99, 4, 1010-41.
46. Lee, Y-J. and Xiao, Z. 1998. Children's support for elderly parents in urban and rural China: Results from a national survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 13, 1, 39-62.
47. Liang, J., Krause, N. M. and Bennett, J. M. 2001. Social exchange and well-being: Is giving better than receiving? Psychology and Aging, 16, 3, 511-23.
48. Lillard, L. A. and Willis, R. J. 1997. Motives for intergenerational transfers: Evidence from Malaysia. Demography, 34, 1, 115-34.
49. Lin, L. 1986. Conceptualizing social support. In Lin, L., Dean, A. and Ensel, W. (eds), Social Support, Life Events, and Depression. Academic, Orlando, Florida, 17-48.
50. Litwin, H. 1998. The provision of informal support by elderly people residing in assisted living facilities. The Gerontologist, 38 2, 239-46.
51. Lum, T. Y. and Lightfoot, E. 2005. The effects of volunteering on the physical and mental health of older people. Research on Aging, 27, 1, 31-55.
52. MacDonald, M. and Koh, S.-K. 2003. Consistent motives for inter-family transfers: Simple altruism. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 24, 1, 73-97.
53. Mangen, D. J., Bengtson, V. L. and Landry, Jr., P.H. 1988. The Measurement Intergenerational Relations. Sage, Beverly Hills, California.
54. Martin, L. G. 1990. Changing intergenerational family relations in East Asia. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 510, 1, 102-14.
55. Mason, K. O. 1992. Family change and support of the elderly in Asia: what do we know ? Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 7, 3, 13-32.
56. Mauss, M. 1925. Essai sur le don. Forme et raison de l'échange dans les sociétés archaïques. L'Année Sociologique, 1923-24. Alcan, Paris. English translation by Cunnison, I. 1954. The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. Cohen and West, London.
57. Mehta, K. 1997a. Respect redefined: Focus group insights from Singapore. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 44, 3, 205-19.
58. Mehta, K. 1997b. Cultural scripts and the social integration of older people. Ageing & Society, 17, 3, 253-75.
59. Mehta, K. 1999. Intergenerational exchanges: Qualitative evidence from Singapore. Southeast Asian Journal of Social Sciences, 27, 2, 111-22.
60. Mehta, K. K. 2002. National policies on ageing and long-term care in Singapore: A case of cautious wisdom? In Phillips, D. R. and Chan, A. C. M. (eds), Ageing and Long-Term Care: National Policies in the Asia-Pacific. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore, 150-80.
61. Mehta, K., Osman, M. M. and Lee, A. E. Y. 1995. Living arrangements of the elderly in Singapore: Cultural norms in transition. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 10, 1-2, 113-43.
62. Menard, S. 2002. Applied Logistic Regression Analysis. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences 106, second edition, Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.
63. Ministry of Health, Singapore (and Ministry of Community Development, Department of Statistics, National Council of Social Services, and Ministry of Labour) 1996. The National Survey of Senior Citizens in Singapore, 1995 Final Report. Ministry of Health, Singapore.
64. Morgan, J. N. 1986. Unpaid productive activity over the life course. In Committee on an Aging Society, Institute of Medicine and National Research Council, America's Aging. Productive Roles in an Older Society. National Academy Press, Washington DC, 73-109.
65. Morrow-Howell, N., Hinterlong, J. and Sherraden, M. 2001. Productive Aging: Concepts and Challenges. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.
66. National Research Council 2001. Intergenerational transfers. In Panel on a Research Agenda and New Data for an Aging World, Committee on Population and Committee on National Statistics, National Research Council, Preparing for an Aging World: The Case for Cross-National Research. National Academy Press, Washington DC, 115-99.
67. Ngin, C. and DaVanzo, J. 1999. Parent-child coresidence and quasi-coresidence in peninsular Malaysia. Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, 27, 2, 43-64.
68. Ofstedal, M. B., Knodel, J. and Chayovan, N. 1999. Intergenerational support and gender: A comparison of four Asian countries. Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, 27, 2, 21-42,
69. Ostir, G.V., Simonsick, E., Kasper, J. D. and Guralnik, J. M. 2002. Satisfaction with support given and its association with subsequent health status. Journal of Aging and Health, 14, 3, 355-69.
70. Peters, G. R. and Kaiser, M. A. 1985. The role of friends and neighbors in providing social support. In Sauer, W. J. and Coward, R. T. (eds), Social Support Networks and the Care of the Elderly: Theory, Research, and Practice. Springer Publishing Company, New York, 123-58.
71. Phillips, D.R. (ed.) 2000. Ageing in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Policies and Future Trends. Routledge, New York.
72. Phua, K. H. and Yap, M. T. 1998. Financing health care in old age: policy issues and implications in Singapore. Asian Journal of Political Science, 6, 1, 120-37.
73. Riley, M. W. 1987. On the significance of age in sociology. American Sociological Review, 52, 1-14.
74. Riley, M. W., Foner, A. and Waring, J. 1988. Sociology of age. In Smelser, N. J. (ed.), Handbook of Sociology. Sage, Newbury Park, California, 243-90.
75. Rosow, I. 1967. Social Integration of the Aged. Free Press, New York.
76. Sanders, G. F. 1988. Family contributions of older persons. Activities, Adaptation and Aging, 11, 1, 53-60.
77. SAS Institute Inc. 1999. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Cary, North Carolina.
78. Schoeni, R. F. 1997. Private interhousehold transfers of money and time: new empirical evidence. Review of Income and Wealth, 43, 4, 423-48.
79. Silverstein, M., Cong, Z. and Li, S. 2006. Intergenerational transfers and living arrangements of older people in rural China: Consequences for psychological well-being. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 61B, 5, S256-66.
80. Silverstein, M., Conroy, S. J., Wang, H., Giarrusso, R. and Bengtson, V. L. 2002. Reciprocity in parent-child relations over the adult life course. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 57B, 1, S3-13.
81. Simmel, G. 1907. Exchange. In idem, Philosophie des Geldes [Philosophy of Wealth]. Duncker and Humblot, Leipzig, Germany, 33-61. Translation by Levine, D. N. 1971. Georg Simmel: On Individuality and Social Forms. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, 43-69.
82. Simmel, G. 1922. Die kreuzung sozialer kreise [The web of group affiliations]. In idem, Soziologie. Duncker and Humblot, Munich, Germany, 305-44. Translation by Wolf, K. H. and Bendix, R. 1955. Conflict and the Web of Group Affiliations. Free Press, New York, 125-95.
83. Soldo, B. J. and Freedman, V. A. 1994. Care of the elderly: Division of labor among the family, market, and state. In Martin, L. G. and Preston, S. H. (eds), Demography of Aging. National Academy Press, Washington DC, 195-216.
84. Soldo, B. J. and Hill, M. S. 1993. Intergenerational transfers: economic, demographic, and social perspectives. In Maddox, G. L. and Lawton, M. P. (eds), Annual Review Gerontology and Geriatrics 13. Springer Publishing Company, New York, 187-216.
85. Spillman, B. C. 2004. Changes in elderly disability rates and the implications for health care utilization and cost. Milbank Quarterly 82, 1, 157-94.
86. Stoller, E. P. 1983. Help with activities of everyday life: Sources of support for the non-institutionalized elderly. The Gerontologist, 23, 1, 64-70.
87. Stoller, E. P. 1985. Exchange patterns in the informal support networks of the elderly: The impact of reciprocity on morale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 2, 335-42.
88. Stone, R., Cafferata, G. and Sangl, J. 1987. Caregivers of the frail elderly: A national profile. The Gerontologist, 27, 616-26.
89. Tay, B. N. 2003. The Graying of Singapore. Humanities Press, Singapore.
90. Teo, P. and Mehta, K. 2001. Participating in the home: Widows cope in Singapore. Journal of Aging Studies, 15, 127-44.
91. Teo, Y. 2005. No Economy, no Singapore: Weddings, Babies and the Development Project. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Sociology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
92. Thomas, E. 1990. Filial piety, social change, and Singapore youth. Journal of Moral Education, 19, 3, 192-205.
93. Thornton, A. and Lin, H.-S. (eds) 1994. Social Change and the Family in Taiwan. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
94. Van Tilburg, T. and Broese van Groenou, J. 2002. Network and health changes among older Dutch adults. Journal of Social Issues, 58 4, 697-713.
95. Verbrugge, L. M., Mehta, K. K. and Wagenfeld-Heintz, E. 2006. Views of disability in the U.S. and Singapore. Research on Aging, 28, 2, 216-39.
96. Walster, E., Walster, G. W. and Berscheid, E. 1978. Equity: Theory and Research. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, Massachusetts.
97. Wentkowski, G. J. 1981. Reciprocity and the coping strategies of older people: Cultural dimensions of network building. The Gerontologist 21, 6, 600-9.
98. Wolff, J. L. and Agree, E. M. 2004. Depression among recipients of informal care: The effects of reciprocity, respect, and adequacy of support. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 59B, 3, S173-80.
99. Wong, O. M. H. and Chau, B. H. P. 2006. The evolving role of filial piety in eldercare in Hong Kong. Asian Journal of Social Science, 34, 4, 600-17.