An Exposimetry System Using Tissue-Mimicking Liquid

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 123-136

  Stiles, Timothy A ^a   Madsen, Ernest L ^a   Frank, Gary R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Acoustic output; Exposimetry; Nonlinear propagation; Tissue mimicking

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC WAVE PROPAGATION; APPROXIMATION THEORY; NONLINEAR SYSTEMS; NUMERICAL METHODS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; ULTRASONICS;

ACOUSTIC OUTPUT; EXPOSIMETRY; NONLINEAR PROPAGATION; TISSUE MIMICKING;

TISSUE;

ACOUSTICS; ARTICLE; LIQUID; MEASUREMENT; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND TRANSMISSION; ULTRASOUND; ULTRASOUND TRANSDUCER;

ACOUSTICS; ANIMALS; HUMANS; MILK; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; TRANSDUCERS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER, PULSED; WATER;

EID: 37049022590     PISSN: 03015629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2007.06.023     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. AIUM/NEMA. Acoustic Output Measurement Standard for Diagnostic Ultrasound Equipment (2004) American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, Laurel, MD, and National Electrical Manufacturers Association, Rosslyn, VA
2. Berntsen J. Numerical calculations of finite amplitude sound beams. In: Hamilton M.F., and Blackstock D.T. (Eds). Frontiers of Nonlinear Acoustics (1990) 191-196 Proceedings of the 12th ISNA, Elsevier Applied Science
3. Bigelow T.A., and O'Brien Jr. W.D. Experimental evaluation of indicators of nonlinearity for use in ultrasound transducer characterizations. Ultrasound Med Biol 28 (2002) 1509-1520
4. Brekhovskikh L.M. Waves in Layered Media. second edition (1980), Academic Press, New York, NY Translated by Robert T. Beyer
5. Cahill M.D., and Humphrey V.F. A theoretical investigation of the effect of nonlinear propagation on measurements of mechanical index. Ultrasound Med Biol 26 (2000) 433-440
6. Christopher T. Computing the mechanical index. J Ultrasound Med 18 (1999) 63-68
7. Divall S.A., and Humphrey V.F. Finite difference modelling of the temperature rise in non-linear medical ultrasound fields. Ultrasonics 38 (2000) 273-277
8. Duck F.A. Nonlinear acoustics in diagnostic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 28 (2002) 1-18
9. Duncan T, Humphrey VF, Duck, FA. A numerical comparison of nonlinear indicators for diagnostic ultrasound fields. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Ultrasonics 2003, World Congress on Ultrasonics, 2003:85-88.
10. MacDonald M.C., and Madsen E.L. Acoustic measurements in a tissue mimicking liquid. J Ultrasound Med 18 (1999) 55-62
11. Marple Jr. S.L. Digital spectral analysis: With applications (1987), Prentice Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
12. Selfridge A.R. Approximate material properties in isotropic materials. IEEE Trans Sonics Ultrason SU-32 (1985) 381-394
13. Stiles T.A., Madsen E.L., Frank G.R., Deihl T.F., and Lucey J.A. Tissue-mimicking liquid for use in exposimetry. J Ultrasound Med 24 (2005) 501-516
14. Szabo T.L., Clougherty F., and Grossman C. Effects of nonlinearity on the estimation of in situ values of acoustic output parameters. J Ultrasound Med 18 (1999) 33-41