Nebraska pollution prevention project: Engineering education through technical assistance

Environmental Quality Management

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 43-57

  Dvorak, Bruce I ^a   Woldt, Wayne E ^a   Hygnstrom, Jan ^a   Dahab, Mohamed F ^a   Schulte, Dennis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 37049006738     PISSN: 10881913     EISSN: 15206483     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tqem.10072     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Behrens, M., Dvorak, B., & Woldt, W. (2000). Implications of hidden costs: Comparison of bitumen testing procedures. Environmental Technology, 21(3), 243–255.
2. Callaghan, E. (2001). Understanding the prescriptive and descriptive waste assessment methods using student interns. Thesis submitted to the University of Nebraska.
3. Rosenhamer, G. L. (1998). Dependence of sequential ordering on pollution prevention option implementation. Thesis submitted to the University of Nebraska.
4. Wanzenried, B., Dvorak, B. I., & Woldt, W. E. (1999, summer). Descriptive versus prescriptive: Comparison of P2 opportunity assessment approaches. Pollution Prevention Review, 9(3), 67-79.
5. Woldt, W. E., Dvorak, B. I., & Dahab, M. F. (2002). Application of fuzzy set theory to industrial pollution prevention: Production system modeling and life cycle assessment. Accepted for publication in Fuzzy Sets and Systems.
6. Woldt, W. E., Dvorak, B. I., & Sheng, J. (1999). Systems approach to industrial pollution prevention with the application of fuzzy set methods. In H.-J. Zimmermann (Ed.) Proceedings EUFIT'99, 7th European Congress on Intelligent Techniques and Soft Computing, September 13-16, Aachen: Verlag Mainz.