Induction of multiple criteria optimal classification rules for biological and medical data

Computers in Biology and Medicine

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 42-52

  Li, Han Lin ^a   Chen, Ming Hsien ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Classification rules; Multiple criteria; Optimal

Indexed keywords

HOSPITAL DATA PROCESSING; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; NEURAL NETWORKS; ROUGH SET THEORY;

HSV PATIENTS; MULTI-CRITERIA MODEL; OPTIMAL CLASSIFICATION;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; FEASIBILITY STUDY; LINEAR SYSTEM; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CLASSIFICATION; DUODENAL ULCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PROGNOSIS; PROGRAMMING, LINEAR; SEX DETERMINATION (ANALYSIS); SWALLOWS; VAGOTOMY;

HIRUNDO; SIMPLEXVIRUS;

EID: 37049002240     PISSN: 00104825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2007.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Beynon M.J., and Buchanan K.L. An illustration of variable precision rough set theory: the gender classification of the European barn swallow (Hirundo rustica). Bull. Math. Biol. 65 (2003) 835-858
2. Hvidsten T.T., Lægreid A., and Komorowski J. Learning rule-based models of biological process from gene expression time profiles using gene ontology. Bioinformatics 19 (2003) 1116-1123
3. Slowinski K. Rough classification of HSV patients. In: Slowinski R. (Ed). Intelligent Decision Support-Handbook of Applications and Advances of the Rough Sets Theory (1992), Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands 77-94
4. Geurts P., Fillt M., Seny D., Meuwis M.-A., Malaise M., Merville M.-P., and Wehenkel L. Proteomic mass spectra classification using decision tree based ensemble methods. Bioinformatics 21 (2005) 3138-3145
5. Aja-Fernandez S., Luis-Garcia R., Martin-Fernandez M.A., and Alberola-Lopez C. A computational tw3 classifier for skeletal maturity assessment-a computing with words approach. J. Biomed. Inf. 37 (2004) 99-107
6. Zhang H., Yu C.-Y., Singer B., and Xiong M. Recursive partitioning for tumor classification with gene expression microarray data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98 (2001) 6730-6735
7. Sun M., and Xiong M. A mathematical programming approach for gene selection and tissue classification. Bioinformatics 19 (2003) 1243-1251
8. Li H.-L., and Fu C.-J. A linear programming approach for identifying a consensus sequence on DNA sequences. Bioinformatics 21 (2005) 1838-1845
9. Pawlak Z. Rough sets. Int. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. 11 (1982) 341-356
10. Ziarko W. Variable precision rough set model. J. Comput. System Sci. 46 (1993) 39-59
11. Quinlan J.R. Induction of decision trees. Mach. Learn. 1 (1986) 81-106
12. Quinlan J.R. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning (1993), Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA
13. Dunn D.C., Thomas W.E.G., and Hunter J.O. An evaluation of highly selective vagotomy in the treatment of chronic duodenal ulcer. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 150 (1980) 845-849
14. Goligher J.C., Hill G.L., Kenny T.E., and Nutter E. Proximal gastric vagotomy without drainage for duodenal ulcer: results after 5-8 years. Br. J. Surg. 65 (1978) 145-151
15. Predki B., Slowinski R., Stefanowski J., Susmaga R., and Wilk S. Rose-software implementation of the rough set theory. In: Polkowski L., and Skowron A. (Eds). Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing, Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 1424 (1998), Springer, Berlin 605-608