A viewpoint-based framework for discussing the use of multiple modelling representations

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1920, Issue , 2000, Pages 154-167

  Stanger, Nigel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TERMINOLOGY;

DATA FLOW; ENTITY-RELATIONSHIP; MULTIPLE DESCRIPTIONS; MULTIPLE REPRESENTATION; REAL-WORLD;

DATA FLOW ANALYSIS;

EID: 37049001553     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45393-8_12     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Paolo Atzeni and Riccardo Torlone. Management of multiple models in an exten-sible database design tool. In P. Apers, M. Bouzeghoub, and G. Gardarin, editors, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Extending Database Techno-logy (EDBT'96), volume 1057 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 79-95, Avignon, France, March 25-29 1996. Springer-Verlag.
2. Paolo Atzeni and Riccardo Torlone. MDM: A multiple-data-model tool for the management of heterogeneous database schemes. In Joan M. Peckman, editor, Proceedings of the SIGMOD 1997 International Conference on the Management of Data, pages 528-531, Tucson, Arizona, May 13-15 1997. Association for Computing Machinery, ACM Press.
3. R. G. G. Cattell, Douglas K. Barry, Mark Berler, Jeff Eastman, David Jordan, Craig Russell, Olaf Schadow, Torsten Stanienda, and Fernando Velez. The Object Data Standard: ODMG 3. 0. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, California, 2000.
4. P. B. Checkland. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. John Wiley & Sons, Chi-chester, England, 1981.
5. Peter Pin-Shan Chen. The entity-relationship model| Toward a unified view of data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1(1): 9-36, 1976.
6. E. F. Codd. A relational model of data for large shared data banks. Communica-tions of the ACM, 13(6), 1970.
7. Peta Darke and Graeme Shanks. Viewpoint development for requirements defini-tion: Towards a conceptual framework. In Proceedings of the Sixth Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS'95), pages 277-288, Perth, Australia, September 26-29 1995.
8. Peta Darke and Graeme Shanks. Stakeholder viewpoints in requirements definition: A framework for understanding viewpoint development approaches. Requirements Engineering, 1: 88-105, 1996.
9. Steve M. Easterbrook. Elicitation of Requirements from Multiple Perspectives. PhD thesis, Imperial College of Science Technology and Medicine, University of London, London, 1991.
10. A. C. W. Finkelstein, M. Goedicke, J. Kramer, and C. Niskier. ViewPoint oriented software development: Methods and viewpoints in requirements engineering. In J. A. Bergstra and L. M. G. Feijs, editors, Proceedings of the Second Meteor Works-hop on Methods for Formal Specification, volume 490 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 29-54, Mierlo, The Netherlands, September 1989. Springer-Verlag.
11. C. Gane and T. Sarson. Structured Systems Analysis: Tools and Techniques. Prentice-Hall Software Series. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Clifis, New Jersey, 1979.
12. John C. Grundy. Multiple Textual and Graphical Views for Interactive Software Development Environments. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, Uni-versity of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, June 1993.
13. John C. Grundy and John G. Hosking. Constructing integrated software deve-lopment environments with MViews. International Journal of Applied Software Technology, 2(3/4): 133-160, 1997.
14. P. Hsia, J. Samuel, J. Gao, D. Kung, Y. Toyoshima, and C. Chen. Formal approach to scenario analysis. IEEE Software, 11(2): 33-41, March 1994.
15. Richard Hull and Roger King. Semantic database modeling: Survey, applications, and research issues. ACM Computing Surveys, 19(3): 201-260, 1987.
16. D. A. Jacobs and C. D. Marlin. Software process representation to support multiple views. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 5(4), December 1995.
17. Gerald Kotonya and Ian Sommerville. Requirements engineering with viewpoints. Software Engineering Journal, 11(1): 5-18, 1996.
18. S. Meyers. Dificulties in integrating multiview environments. IEEE Software, 8(1): 49-57, January 1991.
19. G. Mullery. CORE| A method for controlled requirements specification. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 126-135, Munich, Germany, September 17-19 1979. IEEE Computer Society Press.
20. B. Nuseibeh, J. Kramer, and A. C. W. Finkelstein. A framework for expressing the relationships between multiple views in requirements specification. IEEE Transac-tions on Software Engineering, 20(10): 760-773, 1994.
21. Object Management Group. OMG Unified Modeling Language Specification. Ob-ject Management Group, Inc., 1. 3 edition, June 1999.
22. Richard T. Pascoe and John P. Penny. Constructing interfaces between (and wit-hin) geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical In-formation Systems, 9(3): 275-291, 1995.
23. Henry C. Smith. Database design: Composing fully normalized tables from a rigorous dependency diagram. Communications of the ACM, 28(8): 826-838, 1985.
24. Nigel Stanger. Modifications to Smith's method for deriving normalised relations from a functional dependency diagram. Discussion Paper 99/23, Department of Information Science, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand, December 1999.
25. Nigel Stanger. Using Multiple Representations Within a Viewpoint. PhD thesis, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand, November 1999.
26. Nigel Stanger. Translating descriptions of a viewpoint among different representa-tions. Discussion Paper 2000/11, Department of Information Science, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand, May 2000.
27. Nigel Stanger and Richard Pascoe. Environments for viewpoint representations. In Robert Galliers, Sven Carlsson, Claudia Loebbecke, Ciaran Murphy, Hans Hansen, and Ramon O'Callaghan, editors, Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS'97), volume I, pages 367-382, Cork, Ireland, June 19-21 1997. Cork Publishing.
28. S. Y. W. Su and S. C. Fang. A neutral semantic representation for data model and schema translation. Technical report TR-93-023, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, July 1993.
29. S. Y. W. Su, S. C. Fang, and H. Lam. An object-oriented rule-based approach to data model and schema translation. Technical report TR-92-015, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 1992.
30. D. Tsichritzis and F. Lochovsky. Data Models. Prentice-Hall, 1982.