The public venture capital challenge: The Australian case

Venture Capital

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-20

  Lerner, Josh ^a   Watson, Brian ^b  

^a HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United States)

^b Georgica Associates

Author keywords

Australia; Government policy; Innovation; Venture capital

Indexed keywords

EID: 36949039632     PISSN: 13691066     EISSN: 14645343     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13691060701605538     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Abramowitz, M. 1956. Resource and output trends in the United States since 1870. American Economic Review 46: 5-23.
2. Central Intelligence Agency. 2005. The world factbook. Washington, DC: Supt. of Documents.
3. De Meza, D. 2002. Overlending. Economic Journal 112: F17-31.
4. Devenow, A., and I. Welch. 1996. Rational herding in financial economics. European Economic Review 40: 603-15.
5. Freear, J., and W.E. Wetzel. 1990. Who bankrolls high-tech entrepreneurs? Journal of Business Venturing 5: 77-89.
6. Griliches, Z. 1992. The search for R&D spillovers. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94: S29-47.
7. Hall, B.H. 1992. Investment and research and development: Does the source of financing matter? Working Paper No. 92-194, Department of Economics, University of California at Berkeley.
8. Hao, K.Y., and A.B. Jaffe. 1993. Effect of liquidity on firms' R&D spending. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 2: 275-82.
9. Hellmann, T., and M. Puri. 2000. The interaction between product market and financing strategy: The role of venture capital. Review of Financial Studies 13: 959-84.
10. Himmelberg, C.P., and B.C. Petersen. 1994. R&D and internal finance: a panel study of small firms in high-tech industries. Review of Economics and Statistics 76: 38-51.
11. Hubbard, R.G. 1998. Capital-market imperfections and investment. Journal of Economic Literature 36: 193-225.
12. Jaffe, A.B. 1996. Economic analysis of research spillovers: Implications for the advanced technology program. Washington, DC: Advanced Technology Program, National Institute of Standards and Technology, US Department of Commerce.
13. Jewkes, J., D. Sawers, and R. Stillerman. 1958. The sources of invention. New York: St. Martin's Press.
14. Klette, T., J. Moen, and Z. Griliches. 2000. Do subsidies to commercial R&D reduce market failures? Microeconomic evaluation studies. Research Policy 29: 471-95.
15. Kortum, S., and J. Lerner. 2000. Assessing the contribution of venture capital to innovation. Rand Journal of Economics 31: 674-92.
16. Laffont, J.-J., and J. Tirole. 1993. A theory of incentives in procurement and regulation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
17. Lerner, J. 1994. The syndication of venture capital investments. Financial Management 23, no. 3: 16-27.
18. Mansfield, E., J. Rapoport, A. Romeo, S. Wagner, and G. Beardsley. 1977. Social and private rates of return from industrial innovations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 91: 221-40.
19. National Science Board. 2005. Science & engineering indicators-2004. Washington, DC: National Science Board.
20. Noone, C.M., and S.M. Rubel. 1970. SBICs: Pioneers in organized venture capital. Chicago: Capital Publishing Co.
21. Rosenberg, N. 2004. Innovation and economic growth, Unpublished Working Paper, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
22. Solow, R.M. 1957. Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics 39: 312-20.