Evidence for the usefulness of nomograms

Nature Clinical Practice Urology

Volumn 4, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 638-639

  Kattan, Michael W ^a   Scardino, Peter T ^b  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; NOMOGRAM; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PATIENT SELECTION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROGNOSIS;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FORECASTING; NOMOGRAMS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 36949016893     PISSN: 17434270     EISSN: 17434289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncpuro0968     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Stapleton AM and Pinnock CB (2005) Nomograms for prostate cancer - is their use evidence-based? Nat Clin Pract Urol 2: 462-463
2. Ross PL et al. (2002) Comparisons of nomograms and urologists' predictions in prostate cancer. Semin Urol Oncol 20: 82-88
3. Smaletz O et al. (2002) Nomogram for overall survival of patients with progressive metastatic prostate cancer after castration. J Clin Oncol 20:3972-3982
4. Greene KL et al. (2004) Validation of the Kattan preoperative nomogram for prostate cancer recurrence using a community based cohort: results from cancer of the prostate strategic urological research endeavor (capsure). J Urol 171: 2255-2259
5. Kattan MW et al. (1998) A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 90: 766-771
6. O'Connor AM et al. (1999) Do shared decision making programs work? A systematic overview. Med Decis Making 11: 523
7. Porter M and Teisberg E (2006) Redefining health care: Creating value-based competition on results, edn 1. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press