Counterplanning deceptions to foil cyber-attack plans

IEEE Systems, Man and Cybernetics Society Information Assurance Workshop

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 221-228

  Rowe, N C ^a  

^a The Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

Access control; Computer hacking; Decision theory; Displays; Information systems; Intelligent agent; Military computing; Operating systems; Stochastic processes; Technological innovation

Indexed keywords

ACCESS CONTROL; COMPUTATION THEORY; COMPUTER CONTROL SYSTEMS; COMPUTER CRIME; COST EFFECTIVENESS; CRIME; CYBERNETICS; DECISION THEORY; DISPLAY DEVICES; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INTELLIGENT AGENTS; MILITARY APPLICATIONS; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; PERSONAL COMPUTING; RANDOM PROCESSES; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

COMPUTER HACKING; COST EFFECTIVE; CYBER-ATTACKS; INFERENCE METHODS; INFORMATION WARFARE; MILITARY COMPUTING; MULTI-AGENT PLANNING; TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION;

COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEMS;

EID: 36949014713     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SMCSIA.2003.1232425     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. McClure, S., Scambray, J., and Kurtz, G., Hacking Exposed: Network Security Secrets and Solutions, third edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Osborne Media, 2001.
2. The Honeynet Project, Know Your Enemy. Boston: Addison-Wesley, 2002.
3. Fowler, C. A., and Nesbit, R. F., Tactical deception in air-land warfare. Journal of Electronic Defense, Vol. 18, No. 6 (June 1995), pp. 37-44 & 76-79.
4. Dunnigan, J. F., and Nofi, A. A., Victory and Deceit, second edition: Deception and Trickery in War. San Jose, CA: Writers Club Press, 2001.
5. Michael, B., Auguston, M., Rowe, N., and Riehle, R., Software decoys: intrusion detection and countermeasures. Proc. 2002 Workshop on Information Assurance, West Point, NY, June 2002.
6. Carbonell, J., Counterplanning: A strategy-based model of adversary planning in real-world situations, Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 16, 1981, pp. 295-329.
7. Applegate, C., Elsaesser, C., and Sanborn, J., An architecture for adversarial planning, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 20 (1), January/February 1990, pp. 186-194.
8. Carley, K., Inhibiting adaptation, Proc. Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, Monterey CA, USA, June 2002.
9. Lowry, J., An initial foray into understanding adversary planning and courses of action. Proc. DARPA Information Survivability Conference & Exposition II, Anaheim, CA, June 2001, vol. 1, pp. 123-133.
10. Cohen, F., Simulating cyber attacks, defenses, and consequences. http://all.net/journal/ntb/simulate/simulate.html, May 1999.
11. Rowe, N., and Galvin, T., An authoring system for intelligent procedural-skill tutors, IEEE Intelligent Systems, 13(3), May/June 1998, pp. 61-69.
12. Rowe, N., and Schiavo, S., An intelligent tutor for intrusion detection on computer systems, Computers and Education, 31, 1998, pp. 395-404.
13. Rowe, N., and Andrade, S., Counterplanning for multi-agent plans using stochastic means-ends analysis, IASTED Artificial Intelligence and Applications Conference, Malaga, Spain, September 2002, pp. 405-410.
14. Weiss, G., (Ed.), Multiagent Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.
15. Tognazzini, B., Principles, techniques, and ethics of stage magic and their application to human interface design. Proc. Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems (INTERCHI) 1993, Amsterdam, April 1993, pp. 355-362.
16. Heuer, R. J., Cognitive factors in deception and counterdeception. In Strategic Military Deception, ed. Daniel, D. C., and Herbig, K. L., New York: Pergamon, 1982, pp. 31-69.
17. Bok, S., Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life. New York: Pantheon, 1978.