Forskningsanslag beviljades oftare för män än för kvinnor: Olikheter i formell kompetens förklarar det mesta av fördelningen

Lakartidningen

Volumn 104, Issue 44, 2007, Pages 3273-3275

  Norström, Thor ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEMALE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; MALE; PERSONNEL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; RISK; SEX RATIO; STATISTICS; SWEDEN;

FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ODDS RATIO; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC; SEX DISTRIBUTION; SWEDEN;

EID: 36949002031     PISSN: 00237205     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Wennerås C, Wold A. Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature. 1997;387:341-3.
2. Glynn C, Hyenstrand P, Jacobsson C, Larsson M, Lundberg E, Wadskog D. Vetenskapsrådet och jämställdheten. Stockholm: Analysenheten/FPF, Vetenskapsrådet; 2006.
3. Sandström U, Hällsten M. Springboard or stumbling block - can research councils promote scientific excellence without gender bias? In: Gender and excellence in the making. Bryssel: European Commission; 2004.
4. Grant J, Burden S, Breen G. No evidence of sexism in peer review. Nature. 1997;390:438.
5. Brouns M. The gendered nature of assessment procedures in scientific research funding: The Dutch case. Higher Education in Europe. 2000;25:193-9.