American piety 2005: Content and methods of the baylor religion survey

Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 447-463

  Bader, Christopher D ^a   Mencken, F Carson ^a   Froese, Paul ^a  

^a BAYLOR UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36949000036     PISSN: 00218294     EISSN: 14685906     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2007.00371.x     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Albanese, C. L. 1990. Nature religion in America: From the Algonkian Indians to the new age. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2. American Association for Public Opinion Research. 2006. Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys, 4th ed. Lenexa, KS: AAPOR.
3. Benson, P. 1991. Effective Christian education: A national study of Protestant congregations. Search Institute.
4. Bibby, R. W. 1975-1995. Project Canada research program. Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada: University of Lethbridge.
5. Brown, S. L. 1992. Baby boomers, American character, and the new age: A synthesis. In perspectives on the new age, edited by J. R. Lewis and J. G. Melton, pp. 87-96. Albany: State University of New York Press.
6. Curtin, R., S. Presser, and E. Singer. 2005. Changes in telephone survey non-response over the past quarter century. Public Opinion Quarterly 69:87-98.
7. de Leeuw, E. D. 1992. Data quality in mail, telephone, and face-to-face surveys. Amsterdam: TT Publications.
8. Dillman, D. A. 2000. Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley Press.
9. Dillman, D. A., J. R. Clark, and K. K. West. 1995. Influence of an invitation to answer by telephone on response to census questionnaires. Public Opinion Quarterly 58:557-68.
10. Dillman, D. A., R. L. Sangster, J. Tarnai, and T. Rockwood. 1996. Understanding differences in people's answers to telephone and mail surveys. In New directions for evaluating series, 70, edited by M. T. Braverman and J. K. Slater. (Advances in Survey Research). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11. Dillman, D. A. and J. Tarnai. 1991. Mode effects of cognitively-designed recall questions: A comparison of answers to telephone and mail surveys. In Measurement errors in surveys, edited by P. P. Beimer, R. M. Groves, L. E. Lyberg, N. A. Mathiowitz, and S. Sudman. New York: Wiley Press.
12. Eckberg, D. 1996. Winthrop University student religion survey. Rock Hill, SC: Winthrop University.
13. Evans, J. H. 1997. Worldviews or social groups as the source of moral value attitudes: Implications for the culture wars thesis. Sociological Forum 12(3):371-404.
14. Evans, J. H. 2003. Have Americans' attitudes become more polarized?-An update. Social Science Quarterly 84:71-90.
15. Glazer, N. 1987. Fundamentalists: A defensive offensive. In Piety and Politics: Evangelicals and fundamentalists confront the world, edited by R. J. Neuhaus and M. Cromartie. Washington, DC: Ethics and Public Policy Center.
16. Goode, E. 2000. Paranormal beliefs: A sociological introduction. Prospect Heigts, IL: Waveland Press, Inc.
17. Greeley, A. M. 1972. The denominational society: A sociological approach to religion in America. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.
18. Greeley, A. M. and M. Hout. 1999. Americans' increasing belief in life after death: Religious competition and acculturation. American Sociological Review 64(6):813-35.
19. Guinness, O. 1993. The American hour. New York: Free Press.
20. Guth, J. L., C. E. Smidt, Lyman A. Kellstedt, and John C. Green. 1996. Religion and the culture wars: Dispatches from the front. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
21. Hadaway, C. K. 1980. Denominational switching and religiosity. Review of Religious Research 21(4):451-61.
22. Hadden, J. K. and A. Shupe, editors. 1989. Secularization and fundamentalism reconsidered: Religion and political order. Vol. 3. New York: Paragon House.
23. Hammond, P. E. and W. C. Roof. 1988. The Four-state church involvement study.
24. Hunter, J. D. 1991. Culture wars: The struggle to define America. New York: Basic Books.
25. Institute for Research in Social Science of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (IRSS). 1998. Southern focus poll, non-south survey. Chapel Hill, NC: IRSS.
26. Jelen, T. 1990. Religious belief and attitude constraint. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 29:118-25.
27. Kirkpatrick, L. A. 1993. Fundamentalism, Christian orthodoxy, and intrinsic religious orientation as predictors of discriminatory attitudes. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 32: 256-68.
28. Kohut, A., J. C. Green, S. Keeter, and R. C. Toth. 2000. The diminishing divide: Religion's changing role in American politics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
29. Leege, D. C. and L. A. Kellstedt, editors. 1993. Rediscovering the religious factor in American politics. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
30. Lewis, J. R. 1992. Approaches to the study of the New Age movement. In Perspectives on the new age, edited by James R. Lewis and J. Gordon Melton, pp. 1-12. Albany: State University of New York Press.
31. Loveland, M. T. 2003. Religious switching: Preference development, maintenance, and change. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 42(1):147-57.
32. Mears, D. P. and C. G. Ellison. 2000. Who buys new age materials? Exploring sociodemographic, religious, network, and contextual correlates of new age consumption. Sociology of Religion 61(3):289-314.
33. Miller, A. S. and T. Mitamura. 2003. Are surveys on trust trustworthy? Social Psychology Quarterly 66(1):62-70.
34. Moore, R. L. 1994. Selling God. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
35. Park, J. Z. and C. Smith. 2000. "To whom much has been given⋯": Religious capital and community voluntarism among churchgoing Protestants. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 39:272-86.
36. Putnam, R. D. 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
37. Roof, W. C. and W. McKinney. 1987. American mainline religion: Its changing shape and future. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
38. Schuman, H. and S. Presser. 1981. Questions and answers in attitude surveys: Experiments on question form, wording, and context. New York: Academic Press.
39. Smith, C. 1998. American evangelicalism: Embattled and thriving. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40. Stark, R. and C. Y. Glock. 1968. American piety: The nature of religious commitment. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
41. Steensland, B., J. Z. Park, M. D. Regnerus, L. D. Robinson, W. B. Wilcox, and R. D. Woodberry. 2000. The measure of American religion: Toward improving the state of the art. Social Forces 79(1):291-318.
42. Stolle, D. 2001. Clubs and congregations: The benefits of joining an association. In Trust in society, vol. II, The Russell Sage Foundation Series on Trust, edited by K. S. Cook. pp. 202-44. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
43. Uslaner, E. 2002. Religion and civic engagement in Canada and the United States. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 41:239-54.
44. Warner, R. S. 1988. New wine in old wineskins: Evangelicals and liberals in a small-town church. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
45. Wilson, J. and T. Janoski. 1995. The contribution of religion to volunteer work. Sociology of Religion 56:137-52.
46. Woodrum, E. 1988. Determinants of moral attitudes. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 27:553-73.
47. Wuthnow, R. 1988. The restructuring of American religion: Society and faith since World War II. Princeton University Press.
48. Wuthnow, R. 1991. Between states and markets. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49. Wuthnow, R. 1996. The restructuring of American religion: Further evidence. Sociological Inquiry 66:303-29.
50. Wuthnow, R. 1999. Mobilizing civic engagement: The changing impact of religious involvement. In Civic engagement in American democracy, edited by T. Skocpol and M. P. Fiorina. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.