Uncertainty and correlation for loss assessment of spatially distributed systems

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 753-770

  Lee, Renee ^a   Kiremidjian, Anne S ^a  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC RESPONSE; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

GROUND MOTION CORRELATION MODEL; GROUND SHAKING; SPATIALLY DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS;

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

CORRELATION; GROUND MOTION; NETWORK ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE; TRANSPORTATION; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

CALIFORNIA; SAN FRANCISCO BAY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 36849092823     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.2791001     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Abrahamson, N. A., 2000. Effects of rupture directivity on probabilistic seismic hazard analysis, in Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Seismic Zonation, November 12-15, Palm Springs, CA, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA.
2. Abramowitz, M., and Stegun, I. A., (Eds.), 1964. Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables, National Bureau of Standards, Applied Mathematics Series 55, Dover, New York, NY.
3. ATC-13, 1985. Earthquake Damage Evaluation Data for California, Report ATC-13, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA.
4. Basöz, N., and Kiremidjian, A., 1998. Evaluation of Bridge Damage Data from the Loma Prieta and Northridge, California Earthquakes, Technical Report MCEER-98-0004, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York at Bufalo.
5. Basöz, N., and Mander, J., 1998. Enhancement of the Highway Transportation Module in HAZUS, Report to National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington D.C.
6. Bazzurro, P., and Luco, N., 2005. Accounting for uncertainty and correlation in earthquake loss estimation, in Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability, Rome, Italy.
7. Boore, D. M., Joyner, W B., and Fumal, T. E., 1997. Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from western North American earthquakes: A summary of recent work, Seismol. Res. Lett. 68, 128-153.
8. California Department of Transportation, 1993. OSMI Coding Guide for SMS, Division of Structures, Office of Structures Maintenance and Investigations, Sacramento, CA.
9. California Department of Transportation, 2004. Comparative Bridge Costs, Division of Engineering Services, Office of Specifications and Estimates, Sacramento, CA, available at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/esc/ estimates/
10. Choi, E., DesRoches, R., and Neilson, B., 2003. Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones, Eng. Struct. 26, 187-199.
11. Franchin, P., Lupoi, A., and Pinto, P, E., 2006. On the role of road networks in reducing human losses after earthquakes, J. Earthquake Eng. 10, 195-206.
12. Hill, I. D., 1973. Algorithm AS66, Appl. Stat. 22, 424-427.
13. Karim, K. R., and Yamazaki, F., 2001. Effect of earthquake ground motions on fragility curves of highway bridge piers based on numerical simulation, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 30, 1839-1856.
14. Mackie, K., and Stojadinovic, B., 2004. Fragility curves for reinforced concrete highway overpass bridges, Paper No. 1553, in Proceedings of 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver B.C., Canada [CD-ROM].
15. McGuire, R. K., 1990. Effects of uncertainties in component fragilities on lifeline seismic risk analysis, in Recent Lifeline Seismic Risk Studies, Tech. Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering Monograph No. 1, 14-22.
16. NIBS/FEMA, 2002. HAZUS99 Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology, Service Release 2 (SR2) Technical Manual, developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency through agreements with the National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington D.C.
17. Ripley, B. D., 1981. Spatial Statistics, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY.
18. Somerville, P, G., Smith, N. E, Graves, R. W, and Abrahamson, N. A., 1997. Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity, Seismol. Res. Lett. 68, 199-222.
19. Thomas, G. E., 1986. Remark ASR65: A remark on algorithm AS76: An integral useful in calculating non-central t and bivariate normal probabilities, Appl. Stat. 35, 310-312.
20. Vanmarcke, E., 1983. Random Fields: Synthesis and Vibrations, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
21. Wesson, R. L., and Perkins, D. M., 2001. Spatial correlation of probabilistic earthquake ground motion and loss, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 91, 1498-1515.