Regression to the mean in substance use disorder treatment research

Addiction

Volumn 103, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 42-52

  Finney, John W ^a,b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b CENTER FOR HEALTH CARE EVALUATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Regression to the mean; Substance use disorders; Treatment research

Indexed keywords

PLACEBO;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOSOCIAL CARE; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SUBSTANCE ABUSE;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 36849088048     PISSN: 09652140     EISSN: 13600443     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02032.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Shepard D. S., Finison L. J. Blood pressure reductions: correcting for regression to the mean. Prev Med 1983 12 : 304 17.
2. Curnow R. N. Correcting for regression in assessing the response to treatment in a selected population. Stat Med 1987 6 : 113 17.
3. Campbell D. T., Kenny D. A. A Primer on Regression Artifacts. New York : Guilford Press 1999.
4. Campbell D. T., Stanley J. L. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago : Rand-McNally 1966.
5. Cunningham J. A. Regression to the mean: what does it mean? Alcohol Alcohol 2006 41 : 580 [Letter to the Editor].
6. Finney J. W., Moos R. H. Entering treatment for alcohol abuse: a stress and coping model. Addiction 1995 90 : 1223 40.
7. Haller D. L., Miles D. R., Dawson K. S. Factors influencing treatment enrollment by pregnant substance abusers. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2003 29 : 117 31.
8. Proudfoot H., Teesson M., Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. Who seeks treatment for alcohol dependence? Findings from the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2002 37 : 451 6.
9. Project MATCH Research Group. Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes. J Stud Alcohol 1997 58 : 7 29.
10. Morton V., Torgerson D. J. Regression to the mean: treatment effect without the intervention. J Eval Clin Pract 2005 11 : 59 65.
11. Sobell L. C., Sobell M. B., Leo G. I., Agrawal S., Johnson-Young L., Cunningham J. A. Promoting self-change with alcohol abusers: a community-level mail intervention based on natural recovery studies. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2002 26 : 936 48.
12. Malcolm R., Anton R. F., Randall C. L., Johnston A., Brady K., Thevos A. A placebo-controlled trial of buspirone in anxious inpatient alcoholics. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1992 16 : 1007 13.
13. Weiss R. D., Locastro J. S., Swift R., Zweben A., Miller W. R., Longabaugh R. et al. Use of a 'psychotherapy with no pills' treatment condition as part of a combined pharmacotherapy-psychotherapy research study of alcohol dependence. J Stud Alcohol Suppl 2005 15 : 43 49.
14. Hrobjartsson A., Gotzsche P. C. Is the placebo powerless? Update of a systematic review with 52 new randomized trials comparing placebo with no treatment. J Intern Med 2004 256 : 91 100.
15. Anton R. F., O'Malley S. S., Ciraulo D. A., Cisler R. A., Couper D., Donovan D. M. et al. Combined pharmacotherapies and behavioral interventions for alcohol dependence: the COMBINE study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2006 295 : 2003 17.
16. Emrick C. D. A review of psychologically oriented treatment of alcoholism: II. The relative effectiveness of different treatment approaches and the effectiveness of treatment versus no treatment. J Stud Alcohol 1975 36 : 88 108.
17. Yudkin P. L., Stratton I. M. How to deal with regression to the mean in intervention studies. Lancet 1996 347 : 241 3.
18. Sobell L. C., Sobell M. B. Timeline follow-back: a technique for assessing self-reported alcohol consumption. In : Litten R. Z., Allen J., editors. Measuring Alcohol Consumption: Psychosocial and Biological Methods. Clifton, NJ : Humana Press 1992, p. 41 72.
19. Finney J. W., Moos R. H., Humphreys K. A comparative evaluation of substance abuse treatment: II. Linking proximal outcomes of 12-step and cognitive-behavioral treatment to substance use outcomes. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1999 23 : 537 44.
20. Ouimette P. C., Finney J. W., Moos R. H. Twelve step and cognitive-behavioral treatment for substance abuse: a comparison of treatment effectiveness. J Consult Clin Psychol 1997 65 : 230 40.
21. Winship C., Morgan S. L. The estimation of causal effects from observational data. Annu Rev Sociol 1999 25 : 659 707.
22. Hernan M. A., Robins J. M. Instruments for causal inference: an epidemiologist's dream? Epidemiology 2006 17 : 360 72.
23. Gehr B. T., Weiss C., Porzsolt F. The fading of reported effectiveness. A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005 6 : 25.
24. Trikalinos T. A., Churchill R., Ferri M., Leucht S., Tuunainen A., Wahlbeck K. et al. Effect sizes in cumulative meta-analyses of mental health randomized trials evolved over time. J Clin Epidemiol 2004 57 : 1124 30.
25. Rosenthal R. The 'file drawer problem' and the tolerance for null results. Psychol Bull 1979 86 : 638 41.
26. Kraemer H. C., Gardner C., Brooks J. O., Yesavage J. A. Advantages of excluding underpowered studies in meta-analysis: inclusionist versus exclusionist viewpoints. Psychol Methods 1998 3 : 23 31.
27. Feinn R., Kranzler H. R. Does effect size in naltrexone trials for alcohol dependence differ for single-site vs. multiple-center studies? Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2005 29 : 983 8.
28. Volpicelli J. R., Alterman A. I., Hayashida M., O'Brien C. P. Naltrexone in the treatment of alcohol dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1992 49 : 876 80.
29. O'Malley S. S., Jaffe A. J., Chang G., Shottenfeld R. S., Meyer R. E., Rounsaville B. Naltrexone and coping skills therapy for alcohol dependence: a controlled study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1992 49 : 881 7.
30. Kraemer H. C., Mintz J., Tinklenberg J., Yesavage J. A. Caution regarding the use of pilot studies to guide power calculations for study proposals. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006 63 : 484 9.
31. Light R. J., Pillemer D. B. Summing Up: the Science of Reviewing Research. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press 1984.
32. Lau J., Antman E. M., Jimenez-Silva J., Kupelnick B., Mosteller F., Chalmers T. C. Cumulative meta-analysis of therapeutic trials for myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1992 327 : 248 54.
33. Krum H., Tonkin A. Why do phase III trials of promising heart failure drugs often fail? The contribution of 'regression to the truth'. J Card Fail 2003 9 : 347 9.
34. Moyer A., Finney J. W., Swearingen C. E., Vergun P. Brief interventions for alcohol problems: a meta-analytic review of controlled investigations in treatment-seeking and non-treatment-seeking populations. Addiction 2002 97 : 279 92.
35. Muellerleile P., Mullen B. Sufficiency and stability for public health interventions using cumulative meta-analysis. Am J Public Health 2006 96 : 515 22.
36. Kraemer H. C., Kupfer D. J. Size of treatment effects and their importance to clinical research and practice. Biol Psychiatry 2006 59 : 990 6.
37. Gaffan E. A., Tsaousis I., Kemp-Wheeler S. M. Researcher allegiance and meta-analysis: the case of cognitive therapy for depression. J Consult Clin Psychol 1995 63 : 966 80.
38. Barnett A. G., van der Pols J. C., Dobson A. J. Regression to the mean: what it is and how to deal with it. Int J Epidemiol 2005 34 : 215 20.