Virtual shapers & movers: Form and motion affect sex perception

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 253, Issue , 2007, Pages

  McDonnell, Rachel ^a   Jörg, Sophie ^a   Hodgins, Jessica K ^c   Newell, Fiona ^b   O'Sullivan, Carol ^a  

^a Graphics Research Group   (Germany)

^b TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^c CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Motion capture; Perception; Virtual humans

Indexed keywords

ANDROGYNOUS CHARACTERS; MOTION CAPTURE; SYNTHETIC MOTIONS; VIRTUAL HUMANS;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SENSORY PERCEPTION; VIRTUAL REALITY;

MOTION ESTIMATION;

EID: 36849085016     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1272582.1272584     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. BEARDSWORTH, T., AND BUCKNER, T. 1981. The ability to recognize oneself from a video recording of ones movements without seeing ones body. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 18,1, 19-22.
2. CUTTING, J., AND KOZLOWSKI, L. 1977. Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 9, 5, 353-356.
3. CUTTING, J. 1978. Generation of synthetic male and female walkers through manipulation of a biomechanical invariant. Perception 7, 4, 393-403.
4. DOBBYN, S., MCDONNELL, R., KAVAN, L., COLLINS, S., AND O'SULLIVAN, C. 2006. Clothing the masses: Real-time clothed crowds with variation. In Eurographics Short Papers, 103-106.
5. JOHANSSON, G. 1973. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception and Psychophysics 14, 2, 201-211.
6. JOHANSSON, G. 1976. Spatio-temporal differentiation and integration in visual motion perception. Psychological Research 38, 379-393.
7. JOHNSON, K. L., AND TASSINARY, L. G. 2005. Perceiving sex directly and indirectly: Meaning in motion and morphology. Psychological Science 16, 11, 890-897.
8. JOHNSON, K. L., AND TASSINARY, L. G. 2007. Compatibility of basic social perceptions determines perceived attractiveness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104, 12, 5246-5251.
9. KOZLOWSKI, L., AND CUTTING, J. 1977. Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display. Perception and Psychophysics 21, 578-580.
10. KOZLOWSKI, L., AND CUTTING, J. 1978. Recognizing the gender of walkers from point-lights mounted on ankles: Some second thoughts. Perception and Psychophysics 23, 459.
11. MATHER, G., AND MURDOCH, L. 1994. Gender discrimination in biological motion displays based on dynamic cues. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 258, 273-279.